Thanks
Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
OK folks.
Here is a single file. It's Erwin's two different passes with the different resistors and I've made them into one file with it switching at random points between the two so a bit like if we had a toggle switch while he was playing.
Can anyone tell me at which point you are listening to 1 or 2?
I do not know which resistor is which as I only have the file names.
So listen through and tell me at which points the switch is flipped from one to the other and back again.
I will upload the screen grab at some point in the future so you can 'see' which is which
M
Here is a single file. It's Erwin's two different passes with the different resistors and I've made them into one file with it switching at random points between the two so a bit like if we had a toggle switch while he was playing.
Can anyone tell me at which point you are listening to 1 or 2?
I do not know which resistor is which as I only have the file names.
So listen through and tell me at which points the switch is flipped from one to the other and back again.
I will upload the screen grab at some point in the future so you can 'see' which is which
M
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Bombacaototal
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
Thanks a lot Marcus.
To my ears we have:
Sample1 from 0 seconds to 11 seconds then
Sample 2 from 11 seconds to 17 seconds
Sample 1 from 17 seconds to 23 seconds
Sample 2 from 23 to 30 seconds
But very subtle differences so hard to be really sure
To my ears we have:
Sample1 from 0 seconds to 11 seconds then
Sample 2 from 11 seconds to 17 seconds
Sample 1 from 17 seconds to 23 seconds
Sample 2 from 23 to 30 seconds
But very subtle differences so hard to be really sure
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
So there is no case where the same phrase is played from one sample and then the other back-to-back? That is IMO the best way to spot any difference.
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
No it's just random switch flipping as if Erwin was playing and I flipped the switch while he was doing so at various pointsmartin manning wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 12:32 pm So there is no case where the same phrase is played from one sample and then the other back-to-back? That is IMO the best way to spot any difference.
M
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
Although it may look kind of scientific I miss the point of having a baseline. If you're just listening to the single file differences maybe appaer a rolled off eq or compression or even pick attack differences.norburybrook wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 12:52 pmNo it's just random switch flipping as if Erwin was playing and I flipped the switch while he was doing so at various pointsmartin manning wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 12:32 pm So there is no case where the same phrase is played from one sample and then the other back-to-back? That is IMO the best way to spot any difference.![]()
M
As Im the one playing, I will give this a shot tomorrow.
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
this is completely blind which is why i like it.
Even if I were physically flipping a switch and you were the person in the room playing you'd know that a change had happened, doing it this way no one knows where the switch is flipped so it's a good test IMHO as there's no confirmation bias or expectation bias at, all it's blind test.
I also normalised each file so there was no level mismatch as even half a db can make a huge difference as louder always sounds 'better' in audio tests
M
Even if I were physically flipping a switch and you were the person in the room playing you'd know that a change had happened, doing it this way no one knows where the switch is flipped so it's a good test IMHO as there's no confirmation bias or expectation bias at, all it's blind test.
I also normalised each file so there was no level mismatch as even half a db can make a huge difference as louder always sounds 'better' in audio tests
M
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
Hello --
Spent some time just now listening to the "wav" files using Transcribe, which made it super-easy to listen to same fragments from each recording. Inconclusive, but admittedly was rushed. I'll go at it again soon, and with my better IEM set.
Suggest Erwin if you can generally (ie not 100% but fairly accurately) pick out the unique segments from each in Marcus' patch up then it's clear something's here.
Best .. Ian
Spent some time just now listening to the "wav" files using Transcribe, which made it super-easy to listen to same fragments from each recording. Inconclusive, but admittedly was rushed. I'll go at it again soon, and with my better IEM set.
Suggest Erwin if you can generally (ie not 100% but fairly accurately) pick out the unique segments from each in Marcus' patch up then it's clear something's here.
Best .. Ian
-
Bombacaototal
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
I dig the approach. It was surprising how much more difficult it was to distinguish between the resistros compared to listening to the separate recordings. Curious how far off I was on my estimtesnorburybrook wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 1:09 pm this is completely blind which is why i like it.
Even if I were physically flipping a switch and you were the person in the room playing you'd know that a change had happened, doing it this way no one knows where the switch is flipped so it's a good test IMHO as there's no confirmation bias or expectation bias at, all it's blind test.
I also normalised each file so there was no level mismatch as even half a db can make a huge difference as louder always sounds 'better' in audio tests![]()
M
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
this is what I have done "by hand" as I explained previously and it seems more revelating, more easy to note difference.martin manning wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 12:32 pm So there is no case where the same phrase is played from one sample and then the other back-to-back? That is IMO the best way to spot any difference.
BUT, the test proposed by norburybrook could be fun and I will do it as soon as I have some time
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
I actually could hear more of a difference that way marcus! I edited your post so i can just listen inline
I'm lazy that way.
I can't say i still like one over the other, but there does seem to be more 'open' feeling to the notes on one of the two, if I can explain it that way? It's subtle, but kinda cool. OTOH, I don't see it worth massive extra cost in unobanium parts to get that subtle of a difference, unless I was massively wealthy
(Also the ones I liked, in theory, could be the new stock ones, who knows?
)
~Phil
I can't say i still like one over the other, but there does seem to be more 'open' feeling to the notes on one of the two, if I can explain it that way? It's subtle, but kinda cool. OTOH, I don't see it worth massive extra cost in unobanium parts to get that subtle of a difference, unless I was massively wealthy
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
Ok, then can you tell us the points where it flips from 1 to 2 and back then? I'll give you a clue there are 21 1 to 2 flips throughoutpompeiisneaks wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:09 pm I actually could hear more of a difference that way marcus! I edited your post so i can just listen inlineI'm lazy that way.
I can't say i still like one over the other, but there does seem to be more 'open' feeling to the notes on one of the two, if I can explain it that way? It's subtle, but kinda cool. OTOH, I don't see it worth massive extra cost in unobanium parts to get that subtle of a difference, unless I was massively wealthy(Also the ones I liked, in theory, could be the new stock ones, who knows?
)
~Phil
actually to make it easier just say which sections are 1 and which are 2 no need to isolate the actual switch points
M
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
I'll find time to go back to that later, I just was listening and have to work for a bit 
~Phil
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
Listening on headphones, at around 00:12 and 00:18, I can hear a slight disturbance in the sound stream - are these edit points?norburybrook wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:26 pm
Ok, then can you tell us the points where it flips from 1 to 2 and back then? I'll give you a clue there are 21 1 to 2 flips throughout![]()
-
Charlie Wilson
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm
3 others liked this
Re: Reprise NOS Old Dale RN65D vs NEW Dale RN65D
Sorry I find all of this rather tedious and irritating. Nobody bother with NOS parts because they all sound just like new ones. That will leave more for Tony,Jelle,Gil, and I and all the other delusional people who think they can hear a difference. Having said that, I am glad Erwin likes them.
CW
CW