4 stager

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Smokebreak
Posts: 1391
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:53 pm
Location: Texas

Re: 4 stager

Post by Smokebreak »

Yea i did see that thread. I'll make my way through it now that this one is in place.

I put the cathodes of 2 and 3 on a dpdt so I could simultaneously switch them. Very nice. Hard to describe but there seems more depth to the tone and a bit smoother. If this was a straight up 4 stager I'd switch them permanently, but unfortunately it throws off a couple of the other "modes". I'll keep the switch, though. It's on the MV pot so it doesn't seem like another switch ;) thanks again.

Glad you dig the name, Meat :D I'll try and get some clips up soon
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: 4 stager

Post by iknowjohnny »

I've tweaked a cascaded preamp forever trying everything you can possibly imagine in every combination. One thing i came to realize is without peakers forget it. I'd find removing one or even all at times i thought sounded good. But in time i'd feel the amp isn't right and in a mix it's lost. No matter what i did i found it's just never right w/o them. Thats MY finding anyways, and for me personally it's now a hard fast rule. Doesn't matter how small the couplers are or anything else. W/O peakers a OD preamp just never works right. Lows are never tight enough and it never cuts in a mix right. But like many things in this game it takes years of tweaking/listening to learn something that becomes a hard fast rule to you. I now never even think about not having them. If i do it never ever fails....after a while i realize it's just no right. Marshall really got that one right IMO.
Gaz
Posts: 1146
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:27 am

Re: 4 stager

Post by Gaz »

You're making a generalization based on tweaking your specific amp, but that doesn't mean it's true for all high gain amps. Engls don't have any peakers and they are heavy as hell. Orange's Rockerverb is another example. Just sayin.
User avatar
roberto
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Italy

Re: 4 stager

Post by roberto »

I was thinking exactly the same things. :wink:
User avatar
deeder
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:59 am
Location: St. Arnoult, FR

Re: 4 stager

Post by deeder »

Sorry to interfere with your discussion, but what do you mean by 'peaker',
is it a small cap across a plate resistor for instance!?
Your answer will be very helpful gents 8)
2203/2204-ish/Deluxe Reverb
User avatar
roberto
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Italy

Re: 4 stager

Post by roberto »

Peaker is a cap in parallel with the top resistor of a voltare divider.
Look between the 2nd and 3rd stage of a Marshall 2203.

The cap in parallel to the plate resistor is called snubber.
User avatar
deeder
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 7:59 am
Location: St. Arnoult, FR

Re: 4 stager

Post by deeder »

... And the light comes up, thanks a lot roberto :wink:
2203/2204-ish/Deluxe Reverb
User avatar
roberto
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Italy

Re: 4 stager

Post by roberto »

One more point about the peakers.

If we analyse the frequancy shape only, the combo 2k7//680n on two cathodes create a quite strong difference in gain between unbypassed (lowest) and bypassed (mid to high) frequencies.

Too many peakers together with that kind of bypassed cathodes can create a too trebly sound, specially with single coils.

Of course the effect of the peaker is different, also on the gain stage itself, as changes the output impedance depending on the frequency. This changes the way the stage reacts when overloaded.
Gaz
Posts: 1146
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:27 am

Re: 4 stager

Post by Gaz »

roberto wrote:One more point about the peakers.

If we analyse the frequancy shape only, the combo 2k7//680n on two cathodes create a quite strong difference in gain between unbypassed (lowest) and bypassed (mid to high) frequencies.

Too many peakers together with that kind of bypassed cathodes can create a too trebly sound, specially with single coils.

Of course the effect of the peaker is different, also on the gain stage itself, as changes the output impedance depending on the frequency. This changes the way the stage reacts when overloaded.
And that's even more interesting because both the aforementioned Engls and Rockerverb have no treble peaking and fully bypassed cathodes for most of their stages.
Smokebreak
Posts: 1391
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:53 pm
Location: Texas

Re: 4 stager

Post by Smokebreak »

That is interesting. Just looking at the Engls I would think those circuits could afford a peaker here or there.
User avatar
roberto
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Italy

Re: 4 stager

Post by roberto »

Yes, they do not use peakers, but they cut the midlows and use low loads for the stages, creating that cutting through the mix sound.
EtherealWidow
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:47 pm

Re: 4 stager

Post by EtherealWidow »

If I may ask a question, what is the equation for a peaker? How do you determine the Q and the frequency? What would the Q and frequency be for a peaker with the r/r/c values of 220k/220k/.001uF?
User avatar
roberto
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Italy

Re: 4 stager

Post by roberto »

EtherealWidow
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:47 pm

Re: 4 stager

Post by EtherealWidow »

That is wonderful. Thank you!
User avatar
JazzGuitarGimp
Posts: 2357
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:54 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: 4 stager

Post by JazzGuitarGimp »

roberto wrote:Here we are.

[img:500:391]http://www.linkwitzlab.com/images/graph ... _shelf.jpg[/img]
Hi Roberto,

Thank you for posting these formulae. I have two questions, please:

1. In the first equation, how are the two fractions related? Should there be an = sign between the two (I am thinking probably no)?
2. What does "s" represent in the first equation?

Thanks!
Lou
Lou Rossi Designs
Printed Circuit Design & Layout,
and Schematic Capture
Post Reply