AFAIK it might be even more important in regard to the human perception of the timbre of an instrument as "sweet" or "soft" etc. vs. "hard" and "harsh" etc. what happens in the time domain than what happens in the frequency domain.
Max, I don't agree with your statement of importance. In order to avoid a misconception, the time domain and frequency domain are inextricably linked. The Fourier transform and inverse Fourier transform are well-defined and there is no information lost if you examine ALL the information - (amplitude and time) and (magnitude and phase). In order to fully understand a signal one must examine both the time domain and frequency domain aspects. In general, I would not put a greater emphasis of one over the other. This is where is think some of the information in the link could be misleading to some. I have noticed that many people ignore the phase information in the Fouier transform which is ignoring a very important part of the information. The problem is that the phase information is more abstract and harder to understand so very often it is ignored. I scanned and attached an example containing an image to illustrate the importance of the much ignored phase information. This is a powerful example, IMO.
From the article:
* How could this string instrument sound to me like an organ? Well, the resonances of the harpsicord string are very nearly harmonic, so its sound spectrum is very nearly harmonic. The organ's is almost exactly harmonic. In an old pedal organ, sometimes notes get louder as they are played. So that is the nearest example I could find for this timbre.
It is interesting that while trying to state the importance of time domain aspects and that the frequency domain information can be misleading, the author chooses to use frequency domain concepts to explain why the backwards harpsichord sounds like an old pedal organ. The two are linked and it is not wise to place an emphasis on one over the other.
BTW, the phenomenon in the mp3 that tag posted, and that he is calling flipping is not fully described in the time domain IMO. Yes, there is a time domain aspect to it because the frequency content that is most apparent transistions from fundamental to octave as time progresses. What tag is calling flipping is a good example of why you should not place an emphasis on one or the other. Timbre is composed equally of time and frequency aspects, IMO.
EDITED: changed bloom to flipping
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.