Speaker enclosure preference.

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
CHIP
Posts: 760
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:35 am
Location: Down by the river

Speaker enclosure preference.

Post by CHIP »

For Dumble style amps, I've found that I prefer a thiele 1x12 enclosure loaded with an EVM 12L when compared to a 2x12 open back.
In the 2x12 I've tried 2 Celestion 12-65's, a 12-65 paired with a Texas Heat. I did like the 12-65 with the T-Heat better than 2 12-65's.

I just get too much boomy bass with the 2x12. The Thiele tightens up the bass, smooths out the mids, and now that the EV is broken in, the highs are much better.

now I would like to try an open backed 1x12, any suggestions? Maybe Pine.
When I gig I only take a 1x12, because of the convenience. So that has become my focus.
User avatar
LeftyStrat
Posts: 3117
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Marietta, SC, but my heart and two of my kids are in Seattle, WA

Re: Speaker enclosure preference.

Post by LeftyStrat »

Check out TRM Guitar Cabs.

I purchased one of the wide 1x12 cabs and loaded it with an EVM12l and couldn't be happier.

Mine has three panels on the back for various open or closed back configurations.

I prefer closed back, with the way the pine sings it sounds sort of like a cross between open and closed back.

And their cheap too, I bought mine off eBay for $150 with free shipping.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
Sonic
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:56 pm

Re: Speaker enclosure preference.

Post by Sonic »

I've tried a number of different configurations and ended up with an Avatar 112W Traditional cab with an old broken in EV12L from a 1986 Mesa Boogie MKIII. The cab has the oval opening in the back. The perfect balance all around.
amplifiednation
Posts: 2091
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 6:19 pm
Location: Boston
Contact:

Re: Speaker enclosure preference.

Post by amplifiednation »

I make a signature 1x12, very stout with extra depth for box volume. I use voidless birch and it absolutely sings. I usually do a medium port on these to retain the bass but still give the volume of an open back cab. If you are interested let me know. They can compete with much larger cabs
Amplified Nation
www.amplifiednation.com
@ampnation
CHIP
Posts: 760
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:35 am
Location: Down by the river

Re: Speaker enclosure preference.

Post by CHIP »

LeftyStrat wrote:Check out TRM Guitar Cabs.

I purchased one of the wide 1x12 cabs and loaded it with an EVM12l and couldn't be happier.

Mine has three panels on the back for various open or closed back configurations.

I prefer closed back, with the way the pine sings it sounds sort of like a cross between open and closed back.

And their cheap too, I bought mine off eBay for $150 with free shipping.
Lefty,
Which model did you get, BS112U? Or was it custom made since you have 3 back options?
User avatar
odourboy
Posts: 796
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Speaker enclosure preference.

Post by odourboy »

I have a 1X12 configuration that works quite well with a lot of speakers. It's about 21" X 18" X 12". Solid pine sides, birch ply front and back panel with a 7" X 14" oval opening on the back. Fairly light and resonant. Sounds great for a small cab! Here's a pic with a matching head:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Let's face it, the non HRMs are easier to play, there, I've said it." - Gil Ayan... AND HE"S IN GOOD COMPANY!

Black chassis' availble: http://cepedals.com/Dumble-Style-Chassis.html
Post Reply