Ford/Tag thread locked.
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
I find it strange that the chassis are so different between #182 and #183.
Apparently #182 is HRM.
Also a shot of #184 built in 1987
Apparently #182 is HRM.
Also a shot of #184 built in 1987
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Structo on Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
So tell me if i'm wrong, but was this forum baptized as an information sharing device irregardless of where it came from.
Like the ebay of 1998, it was the wild west. Hats off to the pioneers.
Like the ebay of 1998, it was the wild west. Hats off to the pioneers.
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
Amen, Amen, my friend.Mac Daddy wrote:When the Sun & Moon a-line their well be a second coming were all can share the gifts that Mr Dumble has given us regarding TKT 183
Right now it is best to let things fall into place
For their will be a time when sparks will fly again and all can have that D wisdom
This is What this forum is all about
can I have a amen
PM
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
TomStructo wrote:I find it strange that the chassis are so different between #182 and #183.
Apparently #182 is HRM.
Also a shot of #184 built in 1987
I believe 183 was ordered somewere around the early 80's to mid 80's and delivered in 1989
Last edited by Mac Daddy on Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:39 am, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
My question for the few in the know is why turn back now? The picture was posted and I'm sure it's being passed via email to anyone who wants it. It was nice to see a productive thread that brought new info to the group. Does the current owner of 183 feel the amp will loose $10K in value if the world sees a picture of the chassis?
**********************************************
No I believe the value just went up 20K LoL
As stated by Scott , Their's more to the story than just a photo
**********************************************
No I believe the value just went up 20K LoL
As stated by Scott , Their's more to the story than just a photo
Last edited by Mac Daddy on Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Distortion
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 4:15 am
- Location: Knoxville, TN.
- Contact:
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
I am sure you hope so..Mac Daddy wrote:My question for the few in the know is why turn back now? The picture was posted and I'm sure it's being passed via email to anyone who wants it. It was nice to see a productive thread that brought new info to the group. Does the current owner of 183 feel the amp will loose $10K in value if the world sees a picture of the chassis?
No I believe the value just went up 20K LoL
As stated by Scott , Their's more to the story than just a photo
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
They were not built sequentially. According to the original owner, 183 was started, then several other amps were built and delivered before his was. His amp was finished years later. He was not happy about it.Structo wrote:I find it strange that the chassis are so different between #182 and #183.
Apparently #182 is HRM.
Also a shot of #184 built in 1987
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
Tom, why do you think so? Because of the description on Rob's site?Structo wrote:Apparently #182 is HRM.
Cheers,
Max
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
Yes from that description.
Do you have different information about it?
Do you have different information about it?
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
I believe I know the fellow with #182. 6L6 HRM with feedback on V1!! And a bigger OD1 cap than the .0022 we are used to.
#185 is one that Brandon has been in.... Another 6L6 HRM with some twists.
#185 is one that Brandon has been in.... Another 6L6 HRM with some twists.
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
No, but many people in Dumbleland - including many dealers -thought for at least some time (and perhaps still think?) that an ODS with a Skyline EQ allways is an HRM amp, too. Because of this (and some more general reasons) I am always a bit cautious in regard to such a kind of "marketing description", and was curious, if perhaps you may know more. I sometimes wonder about the "DEEP" switch on the front of an amp with this series # and what looks like a three part chassis.Structo wrote:Yes from that description.
Do you have different information about it?
Tom, have a great time,
Max
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
Yes I have seen some of his chassis that have the wood sides.
I believe #183 is like this.
Strange that earlier amps had all aluminum chassis.
I believe #183 is like this.
Strange that earlier amps had all aluminum chassis.
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
#185 also has the wooden sides..w/ Peavey Iron
Tony
Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
Re: Ford/Tag thread locked.
No the angles of the front and rear panel are too sharp to be bent.
It looks like U shape extruded aluminum pieces front and back with a sheet connected to the pieces for the bottom.
Wood sides with foil glued on.
He also milled out the gradient dials on the tkt amp...that must have took some time... they don't all line up proper either....I bet that drove him nuts!
It looks like U shape extruded aluminum pieces front and back with a sheet connected to the pieces for the bottom.
Wood sides with foil glued on.
He also milled out the gradient dials on the tkt amp...that must have took some time... they don't all line up proper either....I bet that drove him nuts!
"...& I'm all out of bubblegum"