test equipment

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
ted01
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:24 pm

test equipment

Post by ted01 »

What might you recommend for a tube tester and a spectrum analyzer? I'd like a tube tester that actually tells me things like the transconductance of a tube rather than just green=good, red=bad. I'd be using the spectrum analyzer to look at harmonics at the output of each stage of an amp, so it would have to be able to handle tube voltages.

Any thoughts?

Ted
User avatar
nickt
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:22 am
Location: London, UK

Re: test equipment

Post by nickt »

http://members.aol.com/sbench101/#TubeTest

Not built it (yet) but should be much cheaper than a purchased one. There's a Vacume Tube Valley *characterizer* that goes for ~$1300 - probaly more the green good red bad variety (and I'd bet pounds to peanuts based on something like the DIY one)
CaseyJones
Posts: 856
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:29 pm

Re: test equipment

Post by CaseyJones »

ted01 wrote:I'd be using the spectrum analyzer to look at harmonics at the output of each stage of an amp, so it would have to be able to handle tube voltages.
Huh? Why? Why not de-couple the DC and analyze the signal like it's supposed to?
ted01 wrote:What might you recommend for a tube tester and a spectrum analyzer? I'd like a tube tester that actually tells me things like the transconductance of a tube rather than just green=good, red=bad.
The industry standard would be either the TV-7 or the Hickok 539C, might as well get the "C' version with all the updates. It's the Swiss army knife of tube testers, if that one won't do it it can't be done. Expect to pay over a grand for a nice on that has been calibrated.
ted01
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:24 pm

Re: test equipment

Post by ted01 »

Hey Nickt,

Thanks for the reply. I took a look at the schematics in the link, and to be honest, I'm not sure I'm quite ready to build something that complex. I suspect that my odds of pulling that off without setting my house on fire would be slim!

I did a quick search on ebay, and I saw many Hickok testers, some B & K, some Senco, and some military testers (TV-7) and even one of those old drugstore style testers (brought back memories!!). I can't really tell from the pictures if any of them can give me the transcond. and mu. Hopefully someone here has used some of these and can offer a thought.

Ted
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: test equipment

Post by Structo »

nickt wrote:http://members.aol.com/sbench101/#TubeTest

Not built it (yet) but should be much cheaper than a purchased one. There's a Vacume Tube Valley *characterizer* that goes for ~$1300 - probaly more the green good red bad variety (and I'd bet pounds to peanuts based on something like the DIY one)
Hmmm, where does the speaker plug in at? :lol:
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
ted01
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:24 pm

Re: test equipment

Post by ted01 »

Hey CaseyJones,

I think I understand what you are saying... I'm going to want to look at the AC component de-coupled from the DC plate voltages, so I need to look at the signal AFTER the coupling cap, right? However, isn't it true that at some stages of the amp, that AC component can still swing around plus/minus 60V or so? If so, I'm looking for a spectrum analyzer that can handle that type of input. I'm worried that if I hook up that kind of voltage to my laptop so I can use some of the very cool software analyzers I'll blow the laptop up. If I knew how to build a probe that would be safe to use with a soundcard's input I'd dig that. To your knowledge, does such a thing exist? If not, is there a half decent hardware analyzer that I won't have to offer my first born for?

Ted
Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

Re: test equipment

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

I had an O-scope die on me and have had to use a software based spectrum analyser....
you wont blow up you computor
I used a .1 or a .02 cap and either a pot. or resistor attenuator to interface with the sound card
it came with a virtual O-scope and a few other bells and whistles.... the sensitivity of the scope was low...
and the screen was barely read-able
and there was a time latency..... it was usable but had some issues
the spectrum analyser was , on the other hand, awesome.....
and it was free on the web..... look around a bit
Im still waiting to afford a good tester
lazymaryamps
User avatar
skyboltone
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Sparks, NV, where nowhere looks like home.

Re: test equipment

Post by skyboltone »

CaseyJones wrote:The industry standard would be either the TV-7 or the Hickok 539C, might as well get the "C' version with all the updates. It's the Swiss army knife of tube testers, if that one won't do it it can't be done. Expect to pay over a grand for a nice on that has been calibrated.
Hey Casey, I've been drooling over a TV-7 for years. I think it has alphabetical alternatives as well. What advantage does the Hickok have over the TV-7? Are some of the TV-7 varients better; i.e. the higher the letter the better?

Dan
The Last of the World's Great Human Beings
Seek immediate medical attention if you suddenly go either deaf or blind.
If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years time there would be a shortage of sand.
ampgeek
Posts: 1009
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:31 am

Re: test equipment

Post by ampgeek »

Here is a nice little primer on tube testers that I return to whenever the need/desire arises.

I doesn't directly answer the letter designation vs features question but it definitely has some useable information.

http://www.tone-lizard.com/Tube_Testers.html


Cheers,
Dave O.
User avatar
gearhead
Posts: 928
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Virginia (Fairfax)

Re: test equipment

Post by gearhead »

nickt wrote:http://members.aol.com/sbench101/#TubeTest

Not built it (yet) but should be much cheaper than a purchased one. There's a Vacume Tube Valley *characterizer* that goes for ~$1300 - probaly more the green good red bad variety (and I'd bet pounds to peanuts based on something like the DIY one)
I bought one a few years ago, when they were way cheaper. Still not chump change.

It does a measurment of gain, indicated on one side of a meter - 1 to 150 or so. 12AX7s should fall in the 100 range. You choose which triode to check with a selector knob. Other side of meter, activated by a push button, tests for balance between the two triodes (for PI matching).

Big plus is it has a build in speaker, so you can check for microphonics via another selector knob. You hear if it squels on its own, or tap it lightly to see how sensitive it is. Saved me countless hours of trying to figure out which preamp tube was causing all the fuss.
User avatar
nickt
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:22 am
Location: London, UK

Re: test equipment

Post by nickt »

Structo wrote:
nickt wrote:http://members.aol.com/sbench101/#TubeTest

Not built it (yet) but should be much cheaper than a purchased one. There's a Vacume Tube Valley *characterizer* that goes for ~$1300 - probaly more the green good red bad variety (and I'd bet pounds to peanuts based on something like the DIY one)
Hmmm, where does the speaker plug in at? :lol:
Keep scrolling down the link and there's a tube noise tester with a lineout. Me thinks - bang the tubetester and noisetester together hard enough, cut off the bits that squeeze out round the edges and add a small speaker and driver... simple! :wink:
stokes
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:46 pm
Location: NYC

Re: test equipment

Post by stokes »

Heres a link to some good info on tube testers www.alltubetesters.com
User avatar
benoit
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:44 pm

Re: test equipment

Post by benoit »

Tube depot has some old hicocks and heathkits and a few others for sale.
Post Reply