layout differences

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
phsyconoodler
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:07 am
Location: calgary canada
Contact:

layout differences

Post by phsyconoodler »

I was just looking over the D'Lite layout and the Ceriatone layouts and there are some differences.The D'Lite shows the left lug of the presence pot grounded and the Ceriatone is not.
Then the two 22meg resistors on V1b are in series with the cap and the ceriatone's are on either side of the cap.
These are quite a bit different in my book,and I was wondering which one is right?
I wired my presence like the D'Lite and it does indeed work,and my two 22megs are the same as the D'Lite and again they do work.
I could just try the other way and see how it sounds I suppose,but it would be nice to know which one is better.
Crystal latice or vacuum,that is the question.
Normster
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:26 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: layout differences

Post by Normster »

The presence control wiring on the D'Lite was my "mis-interpretation" of the Hybrid-A schematic. It does work and does add its own character to the amp, but the Ceriatone wiring is the correct way for a Dumble. The D'Lite presence was, IMHO, a "happy accident." Try it both ways, but I think you'll find the Dumble method provides more available upper frequency cut.

The 22M resistors can be done either way, but I prefer running the cap directly to the plate and putting both resistors on the grid side. You might be able to hear the difference between the two methods, but it would be too subtle to worry about, IMO.
User avatar
Funkalicousgroove
Posts: 2235
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: layout differences

Post by Funkalicousgroove »

The "Correct" Implemintation of the 22M resistors is on either side of the cap.
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
User avatar
heisthl
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:35 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: layout differences

Post by heisthl »

RE: LFB
Tone wise I can't hear a difference but the correct way lays out better if you're using a terminal strip at the rear of the tube, plate has22m to strip, .05 (or.047) is mounted on the strip, and 22m to grid.
The other way allows you to ground the loop so you can put it on a switch or relay. Grounding point "B" in the picture disables the loop:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Former owner of Music Mechanix
www.RedPlateAmps.com
User avatar
greiswig
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: layout differences

Post by greiswig »

heisthl wrote:RE: LFB
Tone wise I can't hear a difference but the correct way lays out better if you're using a terminal strip at the rear of the tube, plate has22m to strip, .05 (or.047) is mounted on the strip, and 22m to grid.
The other way allows you to ground the loop so you can put it on a switch or relay. Grounding point "B" in the picture disables the loop:
heisthl, what is the difference between grounding that point and just creating an open between the cap and resistors? I did the latter on mine, and have a 3-way switch: open/44m/66m. It is a neat tone control, but the open position is probably several db hotter than the others.
-g
User avatar
heisthl
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:35 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: layout differences

Post by heisthl »

no pop and no volume change
Former owner of Music Mechanix
www.RedPlateAmps.com
User avatar
greiswig
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: layout differences

Post by greiswig »

heisthl wrote:no pop and no volume change
I don't have a pop currently, but I was hoping you'd say that about the volume change. Thanks!
-g
User avatar
Funkalicousgroove
Posts: 2235
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: layout differences

Post by Funkalicousgroove »

Here it is in #195
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
User avatar
Funkalicousgroove
Posts: 2235
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: layout differences

Post by Funkalicousgroove »

#124
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
User avatar
greiswig
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: layout differences

Post by greiswig »

I'm sorry if this is hijacking the thread, but...

Other than the switching advantage that heisthl spoke of, what particular difference does it make whether the two resistors are on either side of the cap or on only one? Does isolating the cap on both sides really sound different?
-g
User avatar
phsyconoodler
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:07 am
Location: calgary canada
Contact:

Re: layout differences

Post by phsyconoodler »

I'm going to find out by trying it both ways on the next build.

Thanks for the info guys!
Crystal latice or vacuum,that is the question.
rutledj
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:08 am

Re: layout differences

Post by rutledj »

Can someone clue me in as to what exactly this feedback network does tonewise. What would be the result of removing it?

Rut
User avatar
phsyconoodler
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:07 am
Location: calgary canada
Contact:

Re: layout differences

Post by phsyconoodler »

It extends the clean range of the amp before it breaks up.And it makes the amp fart out less on lower notes.I have tried it an other makes and circuits and it does indeed extend the clean headroom.
It makes the sound 'tighter' and more focused.
Crystal latice or vacuum,that is the question.
Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

what exactly this feedback network does

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

it looks like an anode follower
havent tried one yet
but that looks like a usefull little thing
lazymaryamps
Post Reply