Pot as a Variable Resistor
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
-
Bombacaototal
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am
Pot as a Variable Resistor
Hi all, Just wanted to double check something.
I attach a sketch of a 1MB Pot set as a varaible resistor, and having it reverse wired in a way that as you turn it clockwise (to the right) you are decreasing the resistance. So all the way to the left you have max resistance of 1Meg and all the way to the right you have minimum resistance of 0Meg
1st question, does it make any difference having the input (ie from the circuit) on the lug 3 or on wiper (lug 2)? And havig the output of the pot (ie back to the circuit) on the wiper or lug 1?
And lastly, should I connect the unsused lug 1 to the wiper?
Many thanks
I attach a sketch of a 1MB Pot set as a varaible resistor, and having it reverse wired in a way that as you turn it clockwise (to the right) you are decreasing the resistance. So all the way to the left you have max resistance of 1Meg and all the way to the right you have minimum resistance of 0Meg
1st question, does it make any difference having the input (ie from the circuit) on the lug 3 or on wiper (lug 2)? And havig the output of the pot (ie back to the circuit) on the wiper or lug 1?
And lastly, should I connect the unsused lug 1 to the wiper?
Many thanks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
Assuming your pic is showing the pot as viewed from the rear, the jumper needs to go between lugs 2 and 3. Makes no difference which lug you call input or output, well, as long as you don't try to use the jumpered lugs as input and output.
You could test this yourself in much less time than it took to create that pic and make this post.
You could test this yourself in much less time than it took to create that pic and make this post.
-
Bombacaototal
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
Thanks a lot Sluckey, yes the drawing is meant to be the view from the rear of the pot. Your input surely helps.sluckey wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:25 pm Assuming your pic is showing the pot as viewed from the rear, the jumper needs to go between lugs 2 and 3. Makes no difference which lug you call input or output, well, as long as you don't try to use the jumpered lugs as input and output.
You could test this yourself in much less time than it took to create that pic and make this post.
One thing that I am wondering about is why usually presence pots (or Vox cut control) do not have the jumper.
-
sluckey
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:48 pm
- Location: Mobile, AL
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
Lazy design. Faster assembly. Bottom line $$$. The circuit will function without the jumper. But if the pot wiper fails to make contact with the resistive track, you will have an open circuit if the jumper is not used. With the jumper, the resistance would simply be the same as if you turned the pot to one end. It's generally more desirable to use the jumper, at least in industrial/military design.One thing that I am wondering about is why usually presence pots (or Vox cut control) do not have the jumper.
I like using the jumper for another reason too. With the jumper in place, I use lugs 1 and 3 to connect to the circuit. Now if the pot operates backwards all I have to do is move the jumper to make it work correctly.
-
Bombacaototal
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
Many thanks again! Makes sense, and I will make sure to use the jumper on mine 
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
It's easy to get the jumper wrong. Usually, the longer I ponder it, the more likely I am to get it wrong! 
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
Then why is it, with a USB port that you have a 50% chance of plugging it in wrong, and it takes me 5 tries?
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
You need a little hair around the hole! Another trick that I use is... You know that little USB symbol on the connector? If the connector body is dark colored, I paint that symbol white so it can be seen easily. If the connector body is light colored, I paint the symbol black so it can be seen easily. That little trick has drastically reduced the number of times I miss the hole.
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10189
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
-cough-
I've never had this problem, once..
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
sluckey wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 6:09 pm You need a little hair around the hole! Another trick that I use is... You know that little USB symbol on the connector? If the connector body is dark colored, I paint that symbol white so it can be seen easily. If the connector body is light colored, I paint the symbol black so it can be seen easily. That little trick has drastically reduced the number of times I miss the hole.
tUber Nerd!
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
Whether the wiper is shorted to the input lug or the other one makes no difference for a linear tracking pot, but it does affect an audio taper. Also the choice of lug you short the wiper to matters in some tonestacks.
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
-
Bombacaototal
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
I while back I came across an amp's feature, I cannot remember exactly where I saw this but it crossed my mind recently. The design had a pot right before the Global Negative Feedback resistor (on the PI connecting side). The cable connected the pot on the far right lug (looking from the rear). The other 2 lugs were not connected to anything.
Has anyone came across a similar desing? I was wondering what would be the purpose of doing this, as the pot is not grounded or the output conected anywhere?
Has anyone came across a similar desing? I was wondering what would be the purpose of doing this, as the pot is not grounded or the output conected anywhere?
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
A pot with only one lug connected is doing nothing to the circuit. Electricity must flow in complete loops; Monodes (one terminal devices) are limited to being antennas or capacitive pickups.
I'd say that this was probably either a mistake, a hurried and incomplete repair, or a sneaky attempt to confuse copiers.
Of course, I frequently recommend in my day job that we produce pedals with a knob not connected to anything that is labeled only "More".
I'd say that this was probably either a mistake, a hurried and incomplete repair, or a sneaky attempt to confuse copiers.
Of course, I frequently recommend in my day job that we produce pedals with a knob not connected to anything that is labeled only "More".
"It's not what we don't know that gets us in trouble. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
Mark Twain
Mark Twain
-
Bombacaototal
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am
Re: Pot as a Variable Resistor
Thaks RG, makes sense. I was scratching my head as I did not understand the purpose, but it is clear now. Probable a mistake.R.G. wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 12:12 pm A pot with only one lug connected is doing nothing to the circuit. Electricity must flow in complete loops; Monodes (one terminal devices) are limited to being antennas or capacitive pickups.
I'd say that this was probably either a mistake, a hurried and incomplete repair, or a sneaky attempt to confuse copiers.
Of course, I frequently recommend in my day job that we produce pedals with a knob not connected to anything that is labeled only "More".