D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
brownnote
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: SF/SAC, CA USA
Contact:

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by brownnote »

heisthl wrote:
Funkalicousgroove wrote:I can't believe you can hear the difference in 470 ohm and 1K screen resistors!! I can't !!
A while back I was trying to get maximum clean headroom out of the standard PI/output circuit(s). The platform was using 200ma Fender PT and Fender Prosonic 50 Watt OT. Without using my ears and just using the scope I got maximum power at 1500 to 6000 hz using the lower value screen resistors(4K7) and higher grid resistors (5K1). Once changed the amp sounded better too.... You can see the difference on a scope. Using the smallest value PI input cap you can stand also boosts clean headroom.
Did you go with 4K7 on the screens or 470R?
Remember kids...Always adjust for minimum smoke!

D'Lite Kits: http://store.bnamp.com/dlitekits.html
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by Structo »

That threw me as well.
User avatar
heisthl
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:35 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by heisthl »

brownnote wrote:
heisthl wrote:
Funkalicousgroove wrote:I can't believe you can hear the difference in 470 ohm and 1K screen resistors!! I can't !!
A while back I was trying to get maximum clean headroom out of the standard PI/output circuit(s). The platform was using 200ma Fender PT and Fender Prosonic 50 Watt OT. Without using my ears and just using the scope I got maximum power at 1500 to 6000 hz using the lower value screen resistors(4K7) and higher grid resistors (5K1). Once changed the amp sounded better too.... You can see the difference on a scope. Using the smallest value PI input cap you can stand also boosts clean headroom.
Did you go with 4K7 on the screens or 470R?
Too much vitamin K - I edited the previous post to 470R.
Former owner of Music Mechanix
www.RedPlateAmps.com
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by Structo »

I see from reading other threads that, on the V1 and V2 plate resistors, the favorite type of resistor to use is the Vishay/ Dale RN65 metal film resistors.
I've looked around a bit and don't see anyplace to buy them.
You guys have a favorite parts house that carries them?
I think I can get most everything else on the tweak list locally so a Mouser order for 4 or 5 resistors would kill me on shipping.
Thanks.
User avatar
kleinm
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:15 pm

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by kleinm »

Structo wrote:I see from reading other threads that, on the V1 and V2 plate resistors, the favorite type of resistor to use is the Vishay/ Dale RN65 metal film resistors.
I've looked around a bit and don't see anyplace to buy them.
You guys have a favorite parts house that carries them?
I think I can get most everything else on the tweak list locally so a Mouser order for 4 or 5 resistors would kill me on shipping.
Thanks.
Just Mouser. Unfortunately, the RN65Ds seem to be increasing in price. Some of the ones I ordered were $1.95 a piece. :shock: I hope they're not getting phased out.
67:1
Tubetwang
Posts: 864
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:30 pm

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by Tubetwang »

Last edited by Tubetwang on Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tubetwang
Posts: 864
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:30 pm

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by Tubetwang »

double post, sorry :roll:
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by Structo »

Those are carbon comp.
The Vishay are metal film.
Tubetwang
Posts: 864
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:30 pm

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by Tubetwang »

http://www.partsconnexion.com/catalog/resistors.html

Oups! Sorry about that...i should of been more specific...

Their web site is not easy to decifer...

You must go to the bottom on the Allan Bradley page and click on Draloric which is on the bottom right...
User avatar
skyboltone
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Sparks, NV, where nowhere looks like home.

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by skyboltone »

kleinm wrote:
Structo wrote:I see from reading other threads that, on the V1 and V2 plate resistors, the favorite type of resistor to use is the Vishay/ Dale RN65 metal film resistors.
I've looked around a bit and don't see anyplace to buy them.
You guys have a favorite parts house that carries them?
I think I can get most everything else on the tweak list locally so a Mouser order for 4 or 5 resistors would kill me on shipping.
Thanks.
Just Mouser. Unfortunately, the RN65Ds seem to be increasing in price. Some of the ones I ordered were $1.95 a piece. :shock: I hope they're not getting phased out.
They were .16 two years ago. It's the lead thing. I'm just looking for whatever Dale comes up with. Soon I hope.
The Last of the World's Great Human Beings
Seek immediate medical attention if you suddenly go either deaf or blind.
If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years time there would be a shortage of sand.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by Structo »

Tubetwang wrote:http://www.partsconnexion.com/catalog/resistors.html

Oups! Sorry about that...i should of been more specific...

Their web site is not easy to decifer...

You must go to the bottom on the Allan Bradley page and click on Draloric which is on the bottom right...
Oh, OK gottcha.
Funny that they don't have common values like 220K and 150K.
Price certainly is good, but you have to order a minimum of 10 of each value.
And they are in Canada.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by Structo »

Looks like Mouser is the way to go.
I just hate navigating that site.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
JimiB
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 9:03 pm

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by JimiB »

kleinm,
did your tone stack wiring change the voicing of the amp? Does your PAB give you a huge vol boost on the clean channel? Is this your PAB/tonestack wiring?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
phsyconoodler
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:07 am
Location: calgary canada
Contact:

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by phsyconoodler »

For the .05uf/10meg pre-OD network,are you referring to the two 22m resistors and cap on V1B?
Does that mean a total on 10meg and a .05uf cap instead?
If that is what I think it is,you are onto something.On my first build I only had two 15megs instead of 22megs and it is clearly more focused sounding.
ampgeek
Posts: 1009
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:31 am

Re: D-Lite redux - an unintentional manifesto

Post by ampgeek »

It's the 0.5/10Meg (to ground) just upstream of the OD pot.

You will see it in the files section under the "Tweaked D'Lite Schematic" thread by MDRoberts. He threw in a little note in that area to point it out.

Cheers,
Dave O.
Post Reply