I've seen this in many of dumbles work, also in a fender I have now, but i'm at a loss as to why someone would do it.
Screen Shot 2017-10-24 at 7.59.20 AM.png
See area in image circled in red. red wires come in, connect to eyelets that then connect to a jumper to another eyelet that then connects to the actual Diode (that specific board uses it all over) but others do not use it.
What is the benefit to drilling and using several extra eyelets for a super short jumper like that? I don't see them, and figure it shaves a little time and a few eyelets off the build cost... not much, but to me every penny counts
~Phil
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I choose not to “waste” turrets or eyelets like that also. But I can think of two reasons. It looks neater to have the wires exit the board from the edges, and ... ok, I can only think of one reason.
I build and repair tube amps. http://amps.monkeymatic.com
I assume the reasons are to bring the flying lead connections to the edges of the board and to allow connecting/disconnecting the flying leads without disturbing the solder joints on the component leads. The strain relief holes are different... no eyelet, just a pass-through for the flying lead a short distance from the solder joint to prevent flexing of the lead near the solder joint.
I definitely have used pass through holes, but these aren't pass through holes. In the Fender I'm going to mod to be a Dumble, and in this dumble layout pic, it's a straight bare wire between two eyelets, on one end it connects to the component, and the other connects to the leads.
Those are not hook up wire, they are the transformer leads. Your suggestion to trim the board leaves out the fact that it needs be attached to chassis somehow. My guess at why Dumble did it is that Fender did it that way so why not.
CW
Charlie Wilson wrote:Those are not hook up wire, they are the transformer leads. Your suggestion to trim the board leaves out the fact that it needs be attached to chassis somehow. My guess at why Dumble did it is that Fender did it that way so why not.
CW
I absolutely get that I met more room for the mounting hardware, just speaking more of the turrets. Ethan's that makes sense. It's odd fender did that though, Leo was a notorious penny pincher, unless this was a cbs design change
They did that in all the Blackface Twins I have been in. The people wiring in the circuit, mostly women I think, were great at being consistent and making them look nice but they were not electronic experts. Their task was to wire as many boards as they could in a short period of time. That particular board may have been done that way to help prevent them from overheating the diodes which are not as tolerant to that as resistors and capacitors. I think having to replace a burnt diode in parts and labor time would be more than a couple cents for eyelets. Just a guess.
CW
if the 124 layout has continuity throughout the board sets including preamp, it is not a jumper wire rather than an extra hole for the wire to pass under the board and connect on the opposite side of the eyelet where the components connect..i would assume this is mostly for strain relief and cosmetic reasons..As a side note here/ it does make it a bit easier to change the components if need be since you do not have to secure both wires and components down at the same time while you solder if you have to change or repair the board.This way the wire stays secured in the hole due to the insulator between the main board and the chassis.Not a big deal but thought i would mention it anyway IMO
BTW I did not design those boards on that layout, IcRacer did
Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
Thanks all. The hole for the lead sounds like something I've done and liked in the past. I'm going to be building the boards myself and just wanted to be sure it made sense.