Safety Compliance

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by R.G. »

strelok wrote:I've been reading this thread over the past week and it honestly scares the shit out of me... the thought of being personally liable for an amp I built on my own time scares me to no end. Even if it is some small .0001% chance of it ever happening.
That's the Big Stick in the USA legal system. Don't know where you are. In the USA, even if you are dead-certain, 100% right and backed up several ways, you still have to pay your own legal defense.

That can be crippling. I know a guy who is in a legal fight with A Major Musical Equipment Manufacturer over a trademark. There is no question whatsoever that he owns the trademark. It's a matter of record at the USA patent and trademark offices. But they have sued him over this, and he must defend himself. The company has staff lawyers. He has ... whomever he can hire, and continue to pay until the case is decided, after continuances and delays, and appeals and side motions that have to be responded to, and so on. He's lost his business, his house, and his marriage as casualties already. If he ever doesn't show up or respond to the next hearing, it's decided against him. It's a nightmare.

The way most small businesses do it is to erect a limited liability firewall, setting up an LLC or small corporation to limit losses to what is in the business. That helps, but then there is a legal specialty in "piercing the corporate veil" to get at personal assets in spite of limited liability.

Some people are "judgement proof" by having no assets to be forfeited. If you have little personally, and what you do have is mostly protected by the bankruptcy laws in your state, you may qualify for this.

It's a sobering set of circumstances in any case. That's why I shudder at custom amps at guitar shows.

One possibility is having the buyers all sign a waiver and covenant not to sue. Those can be hard to crack if they're well set up.

Did I mention that although I'm not a lawyer, I've had a lot of law rubbed off on me the hard way? :lol:
User avatar
trobbins
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Australia

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by trobbins »

Oops, I do have a 60065 to 2003+A1. So yes in Oz it does need routine 1.5kVAC voltage withstand and IR testing, along with 10A PE resistance testing.

It also looked like all valves would need to be made not accessible, due to temp rise - so IP2x and behind a tool required cover.
R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by R.G. »

trobbins wrote:Oops, I do have a 60065 to 2003+A1. So yes in Oz it does need routine 1.5kVAC voltage withstand and IR testing, along with 10A PE resistance testing.
I worked to a later version of 60065. 4kV was the target then, as well as 25A PE testing. It's worth trying to find out what the targets are now.
It also looked like all valves would need to be made not accessible, due to temp rise - so IP2x and behind a tool required cover.
I did this on the Workhorse amps. I'm always baffled at people who leave output tubes (with ~200C glass temps) exposed to inquiring fingers. I covered the back with metal mesh with 0.9mm holes in a hexagonal grid.

One that almost tripped me up was that the temp on the control panel was only a few C under the "may touch" temperature due to the heat rising from the PCB under it.
katopan
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:10 pm
Location: Melb, Australia
Contact:

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by katopan »

Looks like 25A for 1 minute for the protective earthing terminal to parts required to be connected to it (15.2) and 10A for 1-4 seconds for the plug earth pin to accessible conductive parts (N2.2). Two checks for kinda but not really the same thing at different values. God I love standards! :roll:
R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by R.G. »

katopan wrote:Looks like 25A for 1 minute for the protective earthing terminal to parts required to be connected to it (15.2) and 10A for 1-4 seconds for the plug earth pin to accessible conductive parts (N2.2). Two checks for kinda but not really the same thing at different values.
I did tell you that I am not a standards expert! :lol:

Yeah, gotta love standards. Theoretically, it ought to pass inspection if you put a 15A fuse between the plug earth pin and the protective earthing terminal!!

I was especially fond of the fact that I had to buy (about US$250.00) a copy of 60065 to work with. The standards bodies protect the standards by copyright, and are fairly aggressive in protecting their copyright interests. They also update the standards at irregular intervals. So you must meet a moving target, and are not told what the target is until you pay to read it. Then you must pay a lab to tell you if you met the moving target. I invented some new words over that one.
User avatar
renshen1957
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:13 am
Location: So-Cal

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by renshen1957 »

Aaron wrote:I'm at the stage where I am starting to sell amps, so have been organizing safety approvals. Legally, anything electrical in Australia, if it doesn't have the safety tick and something goes horribly bad you can be liable for damages or even worse up on manslaughter charges I was told today.
But have noticed not many builders out there have them, also I see a lot of people assembling kits and selling them.
My question is, are the laws different everywhere or is it a matter of fine print, as in "buying this amp you use it at your own risk and we're are not responsible".
Thanks,
Aaron
Hi Aaron,

Here is some advice (if from the US) from a business man (mfg) and former General Manager of a retail chain of stores. All, some, or none may be applicable in Oz, but this should enter into the discussion. My only connection to OZ is my Grandmother's father went to the Australian goldfields, struck it rich and returned with an Australian wife, my Great Grandmother.

If you are going into business, do this in a business like fashion, and do a cost analysis (do the research) on the following:

By all means get safety certification, which will be helpful in sales, but certification wouldn't let me sleep a wink at night. In the most lawsuit happy company in the world (USA), here are some things that will help lessen the worry from constantly down to a dull subconscious nagging in the back of one's mind:

Get product liability insurance on your product. I do not know about OZ, but I wouldn't be suprized to find that said policies exists as insurance companies are as ubiquitous as lawyers, attorneys, solicitors.

So number one on my list is contact an insurance agent (hopefully you have insurance) to refer you to an insurance broker who specializes in product liability insurance and get quotes and if cost effective insurance.

Number two on my list, Incorporate or the equivalent. In the US we have Corporations, INC; and Limited Liability Company, LLC or LTD,. I will refer to the above as INCS collectively. Besides being an artificial entity (INCS really aren't people) to raise money, INCS give you the protection of the what is called the corporate veil. Your company maybe sued, but the INCS limit how much a hit you take, unless you do not follow proper Corporate procedure (meetings, filings, etc).

You will need an attorney and a tax preparer (either an attorney who specializes in taxes or as in the US, a Certified Public Accountant) to determine what provides you the best protection and minimal tax liability for your business (and to do your taxes, only a fool would do his business's taxes).

I believe these are of greater importance or at least equal importance to product certification.

Certification doesn't just stop at getting a product approved.

You must check with everyone of your components suppliers and/or manufacturers' for certification and liability insurance for every part you purchase, be it transformers, resistors or caps, electrical wiring, electric chord, etc. ad nauseum.

In the States, you would be held liable if the part that failed and injured or electrocuted and you would be without financial recourse to sue the manufacturer of said product, who if a small time winder of transformers chooses to declare bankruptcy than to pay you through the court because he doesn't have insurance and you had to sue him to recover costs. You may end up paying the plaintiff (who also sued the manufacturer) all their legal and court expenses as wells as being sued.

So you have product liability insurance and your suppliers have product liability insurance, an Inc, LLC, or LTD status.

As to certification; there is a saying in the US, many houses burn down from electrical fires cause by UL approved product failures. UL also approves fire doors, so what? As to the approval it's no guarantee. If your approval is from a Government Agency, guess what?. Something goes wrong and the Govt. disowns any liability to your product.

But in either case in the preceding paragraph, you have a stronger position in court. And a fire (for example) or electrocution (another example) is caused by the owner improperly using the equipment (night clubs electrical wiring wasn't up to code, or the musician played out doors in a Rainstorm).

Of course it's never the purchasers' fault. (sarcasm)

Get a copy of other manufacturers owners manuals and examine recent amps with all the legal disclaimers made and/or sold with approval in OZ.

Put these past your lawyer or a lawyer who specializes in said items.

Just my Two Cents worth.

Best regards,

Steve

PS I like Fender Vintage products. These to my memory had UL approval.

By the Rivera Fender ERA (which I do not like) the last amps to be built in Fullerton, California, the certification had for economics (damn MBA bean counters, accountants rule MI companies) was reduced to Los Angeles County Fire Dept approval. (Fullerton is in LA County) A Fire Marshall inspected the amp and then give a little circular pressure adhesive sticker to the product line. No tests other than a visual inspection. It was the minimum Fender could get by with. In other words, they were being cheap asses.

In the course of business in the last year or so a conversation with a former UL employee who bemoaned that most companies get CE certification (it's cheaper) and no longer use UL. Most products with UL approval in the US are made China made and tested in Chinese branches of UL. Engenders confidence (sarcasm, and I am married to a mainland Chinese lady).

A friend of mine required a certification for a Chinese Herbal supplement from at a trade show (for internal use), and the representative took out a pad and signed off on the product. My friend quickly went to on to another supplier. Just saying, remembering the No Lead Paint that had lead paint in Fisher Price Toys for young children.

In my 28 years of retail, I can think of only one product liability issue (most major insurance issues at the point of lawsuits were with with employees or customers who claimed fraudulently they had been in injured, only one suit occurred over a legitimate injury when the insurance company refused to pay and the former employee had no recourse but to sue the company over fractured/slipped discs).

A customer came in and harangued me for 3 hours that B-Complex she ingested had caused an auto-immune disorder which had resulted from the product. I stated she would have to contact the manufacturer, however, I also informed her that the their was nothing in NIH Medical Libraries, associated 40 years of clinical literature, or in peer review medical publications to connect any B-Complex Vitamin or associated factor with auto immune disorders as a causative factor.

The manufacturer was contacted (by the customer and and by the company I worked for). The mfg said no-way there was anything in B-Complex that would last in the body longer than several hours or cause such a condition. They told her "See you in court."

Long story made short, a doctor who was also a customer (and friend) came in after another encounter with the lady (her approach had become more abusive towards me personally), and asked why I was down in the mouth; I explained the situation and the medical condition involved. He asked what the lady's name (turned out to be his patient). Without any additional imput, the Doctor suggested our insurance company contact her and state they would request her medical records under discovery during lawsuit from the clinic he worked for.

That was the end of the law suit (turns out she had the condition for 5+ years), and the Doctor he kept everything closed lipped was her doctor. It wasn't the first time, either.

So even with the best or precautions (product liability insurance, supplement company carried product liability insurance, company I worked for was a corporation owned by a corporation) there is no guarantee that you won't get sued.
Every Tom, Dick, and Harry is named Steve
katopan
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:10 pm
Location: Melb, Australia
Contact:

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by katopan »

When I looked at it years ago it looked like incorporated companies couldn't be only one person, so you would end up as a sole trader. No protection, personal assets were the business assets (you could loose them) and tax was at personal income tax rates. That's either changed or I had it wrong and it now looks like incorporation (Pty Ltd in Australia) can be made with one person and you get limited liability, fixed 30% tax rate and all the other costs and benefits you get with a 'proper' company.
User avatar
renshen1957
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:13 am
Location: So-Cal

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by renshen1957 »

katopan wrote:When I looked at it years ago it looked like incorporated companies couldn't be only one person, so you would end up as a sole trader. No protection, personal assets were the business assets (you could loose them) and tax was at personal income tax rates. That's either changed or I had it wrong and it now looks like incorporation (Pty Ltd in Australia) can be made with one person and you get limited liability, fixed 30% tax rate and all the other costs and benefits you get with a 'proper' company.
Hi,

One only needs a two people for a Small Corporation in the US, otherwise you are a sole proprietor (terminology here), which is as hard a position to be in liability or tax wise. Find a relative, a friend, or marry someone, to form a corporation.

Best regards,

Steve

Best regards.
Every Tom, Dick, and Harry is named Steve
User avatar
renshen1957
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:13 am
Location: So-Cal

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by renshen1957 »

R.G. wrote:
strelok wrote:I've been reading this thread over the past week and it honestly scares the shit out of me... the thought of being personally liable for an amp I built on my own time scares me to no end. Even if it is some small .0001% chance of it ever happening.
That's the Big Stick in the USA legal system. Don't know where you are. In the USA, even if you are dead-certain, 100% right and backed up several ways, you still have to pay your own legal defense.

That can be crippling. I know a guy who is in a legal fight with A Major Musical Equipment Manufacturer over a trademark. There is no question whatsoever that he owns the trademark. It's a matter of record at the USA patent and trademark offices. But they have sued him over this, and he must defend himself. The company has staff lawyers. He has ... whomever he can hire, and continue to pay until the case is decided, after continuances and delays, and appeals and side motions that have to be responded to, and so on. He's lost his business, his house, and his marriage as casualties already. If he ever doesn't show up or respond to the next hearing, it's decided against him. It's a nightmare.

The way most small businesses do it is to erect a limited liability firewall, setting up an LLC or small corporation to limit losses to what is in the business. That helps, but then there is a legal specialty in "piercing the corporate veil" to get at personal assets in spite of limited liability.

Some people are "judgement proof" by having no assets to be forfeited. If you have little personally, and what you do have is mostly protected by the bankruptcy laws in your state, you may qualify for this.

It's a sobering set of circumstances in any case. That's why I shudder at custom amps at guitar shows.

One possibility is having the buyers all sign a waiver and covenant not to sue. Those can be hard to crack if they're well set up.

Did I mention that although I'm not a lawyer, I've had a lot of law rubbed off on me the hard way? :lol:
Hi,

Should your friend win, he can petition the court for reimbursement of his legal and court fees from the plaintiffs.

Many large companies try to bleed the "small fry" into bankruptcy. The USPTO/Trademark registration (if earlier than the plaintiffs claim) should be enough to have the suit dismissed. However, Jonathan Swift's comments on Judges and Lawyers still rings true today.

I said, “there was a society of men among us, bred up from their youth in the art of proving, by words multiplied for the purpose, that white is black, and black is white, according as they are paid. To this society all the rest of the people are slaves. For example, if my neighbour has a mind to my cow, he has a lawyer to prove that he ought to have my cow from me. I must then hire another to defend my right, it being against all rules of law that any man should be allowed to speak for himself. Now, in this case, I, who am the right owner, lie under two great disadvantages: first, my lawyer, being practised almost from his cradle in defending falsehood, is quite out of his element when he would be an advocate for justice, which is an unnatural office he always attempts with great awkwardness, if not with ill-will. The second disadvantage is, that my lawyer must proceed with great caution, or else he will be reprimanded by the judges, and abhorred by his brethren, as one that would lessen the practice of the law. And therefore I have but two methods to preserve my cow. The first is, to gain over my adversary’s lawyer with a double fee, who will then betray his client by insinuating that he hath justice on his side. The second way is for my lawyer to make my cause appear as unjust as he can, by allowing the cow to belong to my adversary: and this, if it be skilfully done, will certainly bespeak the favour of the bench. Now your honour is to know, that these judges are persons appointed to decide all controversies of property, as well as for the trial of criminals, and picked out from the most dexterous lawyers, who are grown old or lazy; and having been biassed all their lives against truth and equity, lie under such a fatal necessity of favouring fraud, perjury, and oppression, that I have known some of them refuse a large bribe from the side where justice lay, rather than injure the faculty, by doing any thing unbecoming their nature or their office.

“It is a maxim among these lawyers that whatever has been done before, may legally be done again: and therefore they take special care to record all the decisions formerly made against common justice, and the general reason of mankind. These, under the name of precedents, they produce as authorities to justify the most iniquitous opinions; and the judges never fail of directing accordingly.

“In pleading, they studiously avoid entering into the merits of the cause; but are loud, violent, and tedious, in dwelling upon all circumstances which are not to the purpose. For instance, in the case already mentioned; they never desire to know what claim or title my adversary has to my cow; but whether the said cow were red or black; her horns long or short; whether the field I graze her in be round or square; whether she was milked at home or abroad; what diseases she is subject to, and the like; after which they consult precedents, adjourn the cause from time to time, and in ten, twenty, or thirty years, come to an issue.'

To all the lawyers in the forum, my son is also a lawyer. He works on OSHA cases and class action suits (injuries).

Best regards,

Steve
Every Tom, Dick, and Harry is named Steve
R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by R.G. »

renshen1957 wrote: One only needs a two people for a Small Corporation in the US, otherwise you are a sole proprietor (terminology here), which is as hard a position to be in liability or tax wise. Find a relative, a friend, or marry someone, to form a corporation.
It's changed. The USA allowed states to allow "limited liability companies", and they do so. Each state sets up the requirements for LLCs registered in the stage.

Some states require no more than one person.
Should your friend win, he can petition the court for reimbursement of his legal and court fees from the plaintiffs.
Yes. He can petition. However, it depends on the court jurisdiction. The USA legal system has a hard and fast rule that everyone pays their own legal fees - which lawyers work hard at defeating.

The stock answer to such a petition is "Sorry, unless (1) or (2) or (3) ... or (N) special cases apply, the petition is denied." The special cases in one state I know of from personal experience is that (1) a contractural agreement predating the suit provides for the winner to get fees (2) certain state laws provide for specific awarding of fees as a matter of whatever the legislature thought would be "fair" that day, and whether they had the large burrito for lunch. :D

This leads plaintiffs to search for places to file their suit.

Don't know how it is in Oz.
User avatar
V2
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 1:45 am
Location: Vancouver Canada

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by V2 »

sobering (and depressing) posts.

So should all DIY guys who sell what they build as a means to continue their building hobby just quit selling?

Related question if I may: would it be less of a legal hassle to offer parts kits rather than fully assembled amps?
pinkphiloyd
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:01 pm

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by pinkphiloyd »

V2 wrote:
So should all DIY guys who sell what they build as a means to continue their building hobby just quit selling?
I'm curious about this as well, as this is pretty much what I do. Build something; play it until I get bored with it or I need funds for another project; sell it.
User avatar
xtian
Posts: 7263
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Location: Chico, CA
Contact:

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by xtian »

pinkphiloyd wrote:
V2 wrote:
So should all DIY guys who sell what they build as a means to continue their building hobby just quit selling?
I'm curious about this as well, as this is pretty much what I do. Build something; play it until I get bored with it or I need funds for another project; sell it.
It's a risk. I put in the same box as riding my scooter around town and eating unwashed fruit. Gotta live, right?
I build and repair tube amps. http://amps.monkeymatic.com
User avatar
renshen1957
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:13 am
Location: So-Cal

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by renshen1957 »

V2 wrote:sobering (and depressing) posts.

So should all DIY guys who sell what they build as a means to continue their building hobby just quit selling?

Related question if I may: would it be less of a legal hassle to offer parts kits rather than fully assembled amps?
A craftsman who makes rocking chairs as a hobby and sells them is in the same predicament where personal injury suits are concerned. A rocking chair kit might be the same risk.

Offering a tube amp kit with a bunch of disclaimers and a legal release forms for liability would be a requirement. Probably that might or might not stand up in court depending on the state.

Best regards

Steve
Every Tom, Dick, and Harry is named Steve
User avatar
V2
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 1:45 am
Location: Vancouver Canada

Re: Safety Compliance

Post by V2 »

If a company called Keyser Söze Amplification pops up selling amps without providing any contact info, it's not me....
Post Reply