who's had enough of Gerry ?

[cbass]

Thank you so much I had to up my medications there for a bit

[Blackburn]

OK OK I de-activated Gerry's account. Let me know if you want the thread nuked or not.

nuke

Seconded.

[ToneMerc]

OK OK I de-activated Gerry's account. Let me know if you want the thread nuked or not.

[img:681:427]http://eyreinternational.files.wordpres ... 1/moab.jpg[/img]

TM

[eniam rognab]

^^^lmao

but it must be tube powered, no sand

[cbass]

^^^lmao

but it must be tube powered, no sand

Im sure there's probably a few tube guided nukes still around

[Zombie_stomp]

Is this thread rigged so Gerry can't see it, or is he just ignoring it?

[eniam rognab]

no, he can see all this stuff, as a guest. he wont be able to post or view pictures or schematics as far as i know.

hi guest zeppo, and burgess the turdster!

[Leo_Gnardo]

Oh DRAT! And I was just about to enter my plumbing-analogous theory of EVERYTHING, that sure would have cleared up all misunderstandings and workarounds involving tinker toys and/or Rube Goldberg routines. Ah well. Flush that idea...

[Zippy]

OK OK I de-activated Gerry's account. Let me know if you want the thread nuked or not.

[img:681:427]http://eyreinternational.files.wordpres ... 1/moab.jpg[/img]

TM

You're right - this isn't rocket science. Bomb science is plenty!

Nuke 'em!

[Merlinb]

I still don't understand exactly why everyone got so cheesed off by that thread. I was just getting close to leading Gerry to an epiphany

Also, only 16 people voted to get rid of him, whereas 20 people voted to keep him, and you STILL kicked him off! Shame on you.

[roberto]

Merlin, looking at the statistics, 27 people voted to get rid of him (or it, intended as a bot) and 9 to keep him.

I hope someone wrote to him before erasing his account, explaining reasons and so on. A deleted account without any explanation usually turns into flames.

[Merlinb]

Merlin, looking at the statistics, 27 people voted to get rid of him (or it, intended as a bot) and 9 to keep him.

I thought "get rid of it" meant get rid of the thread, not the OP.

[Cliff Schecht]

I never voted but I didn't think it was necessary to kick him out/off. He was at least articulate and apologetic when he came off as insulting. His intentions became clear eventually but those still interested in helping were doing so. Ultimately it's up to the admins what happens around here so the final call has already been made. Won't agree or disagree, will just go along with it.

[roberto]

Maybe you are right Merlin, I just saw a question demanding if he was a human or a bot and intended the "it" as above.

[martin manning]

The response is 75% negative, and only one vote is allowed so a choice between get rid of the thread or the individual had to be made. I'm sure there are some who would have voted for both. For a variety of reasons, that is just not the kind of person I want to hang out with.