'66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- gui_tarzan
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:10 am
- Location: The 26th State
'66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
I'm sure I know the answer to this question but I'm going to ask it anyway. Since the neutral wire from the stock power cord goes into the fuse, then into the switch, then into the PT, and the hot wire goes from the power cord to an eyelet on the board where the second primary PT wire goes, I should be able to put the hot wire on the fuse terminal and the neutral wire on the board eyelet (then the green wire to the chassis) from the new cord, right?
The only reason I'm asking is it looks like the original cord is actually hooked up backwards from the factory. It's no wonder this guy gets zapped no matter what way he plugs into the wall, the 110v is always live!
Everything in this amp looks original and is pristine. It even has a killer sound even though the caps and tubes are all 48 years old. Not a bump, wart, or sign of leakage (physically) on them. I thought at first someone replaced the transformer (gut shots also included) but it's got the right date code.
The only reason I'm asking is it looks like the original cord is actually hooked up backwards from the factory. It's no wonder this guy gets zapped no matter what way he plugs into the wall, the 110v is always live!
Everything in this amp looks original and is pristine. It even has a killer sound even though the caps and tubes are all 48 years old. Not a bump, wart, or sign of leakage (physically) on them. I thought at first someone replaced the transformer (gut shots also included) but it's got the right date code.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
--Jim
"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
Ditch that .047 cap, too.
- gui_tarzan
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:10 am
- Location: The 26th State
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
Yes, I was planning on doing that too but why did they put it there to begin with?
--Jim
"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
An anti-hum scheme.gui_tarzan wrote:Yes, I was planning on doing that too but why did they put it there to begin with?
Very pretty amp!
I build and repair tube amps. http://amps.monkeymatic.com
- Jack Hester
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:59 pm
- Location: Roxboro, NC
- Contact:
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
On the pre-'65 models that I have, the hot wire goes to an eyelet on the board. A thermistor jumps across to the opposite eyelet, and out to the PT. I have a '60 model amp that was upgraded in '68 to a '65 circuit board type, and does not have the thermistor. I added one, as I like the soft start that this provides, limiting the inrush current.
Jack
Jack
- gui_tarzan
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:10 am
- Location: The 26th State
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
Yeah, I thought it was odd that it doesn't have a standby switch.
--Jim
"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
In the US, this is how it should be done.
1) Line > fuse > PT
2) Neutral > PT
3) Mains ground > chassis
In the bad old days, they thought something else. It isn't clear what they were thinking. We do know, however, that not every building had + and - wired consistently. I think polarized outlets weren't used consistently in buildings until the 60's.
It seems you know what to do!
1) Line > fuse > PT
2) Neutral > PT
3) Mains ground > chassis
In the bad old days, they thought something else. It isn't clear what they were thinking. We do know, however, that not every building had + and - wired consistently. I think polarized outlets weren't used consistently in buildings until the 60's.
It seems you know what to do!
-
eniam rognab
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2013 4:06 am
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
i agree with you completely phil! may i add something?Phil_S wrote:In the US, this is how it should be done.
1) Line > fuse > PT
2) Neutral > PT
3) Mains ground > chassis
1) Line > fuse > switch > PT
i see alot of schematics with the switch on the hot and the fuse on the neutral. fuse should be the first thing 'hot' hits, then switch. modern safety code, although i switch both hot and neutral....
- gui_tarzan
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:10 am
- Location: The 26th State
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
Agreed, just wanted to double-check. 
--Jim
"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
Re: '66 Ampeg 3-wire power cord question
Switch? We don't need no stinkin' switches! 