Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Hi all, I believe this is my first post on here, been a long time lurker.
I am using a TC M300 in the loop of my ceriatone bluesmaster (that's technically a low plate non-hrm into a bluesmaster PI now) without a dumbleator (my band already think having a head and cab is too much gear!) And I'm having a problem with the master volume on the amp. When I turn the dial from about 9 o'clock to 2 o clock there seems to be little volume difference when using the m300 in the loop. I don't get this problem with a boss dd3 or tc hall of fame.
I was wondering whether it was to do with the preamp output impedance changing as I turn up the volume?
I had the idea of swapping the master volume leads over (themiddle and outer lug) so that the preamp output sees a more consistent resistance to ground as the master volume is turned up and then putting a resistor connected to ground to give a more appropriate output impedance.
The M300 input impedance is 13k ohms, so an output impedance of 1.3k ohms would be cool, I figured that putting a 1.3k-ish ohm resistor to ground before the output Jack would sort out the impedance after modifying the master volume. However, will I be loosing a lot of signal by doing this?
Getting another unit to carry around and run isn't ideal but I understand a buffer would make all these problems go away.
Thanks!
Tom
I am using a TC M300 in the loop of my ceriatone bluesmaster (that's technically a low plate non-hrm into a bluesmaster PI now) without a dumbleator (my band already think having a head and cab is too much gear!) And I'm having a problem with the master volume on the amp. When I turn the dial from about 9 o'clock to 2 o clock there seems to be little volume difference when using the m300 in the loop. I don't get this problem with a boss dd3 or tc hall of fame.
I was wondering whether it was to do with the preamp output impedance changing as I turn up the volume?
I had the idea of swapping the master volume leads over (themiddle and outer lug) so that the preamp output sees a more consistent resistance to ground as the master volume is turned up and then putting a resistor connected to ground to give a more appropriate output impedance.
The M300 input impedance is 13k ohms, so an output impedance of 1.3k ohms would be cool, I figured that putting a 1.3k-ish ohm resistor to ground before the output Jack would sort out the impedance after modifying the master volume. However, will I be loosing a lot of signal by doing this?
Getting another unit to carry around and run isn't ideal but I understand a buffer would make all these problems go away.
Thanks!
Tom
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Might be a routing issue of serial vs. parallel. I would try just using the reverb engine in parallel mode.TomWalsh wrote:Hi all, I believe this is my first post on here, been a long time lurker.
I am using a TC M300 in the loop of my ceriatone bluesmaster (that's technically a low plate non-hrm into a bluesmaster PI now) without a dumbleator (my band already think having a head and cab is too much gear!) And I'm having a problem with the master volume on the amp. When I turn the dial from about 9 o'clock to 2 o clock there seems to be little volume difference when using the m300 in the loop. I don't get this problem with a boss dd3 or tc hall of fame.
I was wondering whether it was to do with the preamp output impedance changing as I turn up the volume?
I had the idea of swapping the master volume leads over (themiddle and outer lug) so that the preamp output sees a more consistent resistance to ground as the master volume is turned up and then putting a resistor connected to ground to give a more appropriate output impedance.
The M300 input impedance is 13k ohms, so an output impedance of 1.3k ohms would be cool, I figured that putting a 1.3k-ish ohm resistor to ground before the output Jack would sort out the impedance after modifying the master volume. However, will I be loosing a lot of signal by doing this?
Getting another unit to carry around and run isn't ideal but I understand a buffer would make all these problems go away.
Thanks!
Tom
Also, are you returning to the amp with the mono output from the TC?
from web:
There are two available routing configurations: serial or dual send/return. The serial mode places the multi-effects processor engine before the reverberation processor, without any facility to change the order -- so no phased reverbs. This isn't really a limitation for 99 percent of applications, but worth pointing out. The latter mode, indicated by a green LED on the front panel, configures the M300 as two independent processors. The left input feeds the multi-effects processor, while the right input feeds the reverb processor, the outputs of both stereo effects being summed to a common stereo output. If only the left input is connected, this signal is normalled through to the reverb processor as well, providing a mono-in, stereo-out dual-effect unit.
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
jcsifu is exactly correct.
I have a M300, and you have to use it in serial mode for it to function at all well in the loop.
FWIW, the M300 particularly is greatly improved with a D-lator. I didn't feel it worked that well without it.
I have a M300, and you have to use it in serial mode for it to function at all well in the loop.
FWIW, the M300 particularly is greatly improved with a D-lator. I didn't feel it worked that well without it.
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
The TC has a low impedance input circuit that is way too low for the high impedance passive loop and the TC will load the output of the preamp. The standard boss pedals have a high impedance input as you are also able to use them in front of the amp. You could try to put a boss pedal in front (in series) of the TC in the passive loop.
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
I use a D-lator in every amp I own that has a passive loop. Everything's better with D-lator on it.Teleguy61 wrote: FWIW, the M300 particularly is greatly improved with a D-lator. I didn't feel it worked that well without it.
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Thanks for all the replies! I will try the switch on the back of the M300 and report back. As well as trying a boss type pedal first in the chain.
Realising a buffered effects loop would be best I had a look around and I stumbled across this fx loop that can be installed in an existing tube amp, what do you reckon it'll be like in a dumble amp?
https://www.tube-town.net/ttstore/produ ... ts_id=5973
There's also a tube version with parallel option but I've never heard of the tube used
Tom
Realising a buffered effects loop would be best I had a look around and I stumbled across this fx loop that can be installed in an existing tube amp, what do you reckon it'll be like in a dumble amp?
https://www.tube-town.net/ttstore/produ ... ts_id=5973
There's also a tube version with parallel option but I've never heard of the tube used
Tom
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Tom are you in Europe?
Please put your location in your profile so we can better help you with products.
Please put your location in your profile so we can better help you with products.
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
It's not very hard to build a D-lator, and it works.
I built one into a D-Lite type build, that is in a Weber chassis that is sized for a 45 watt Marshall. Tight but can be done.
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... ght=dlator
I built one into a D-Lite type build, that is in a Weber chassis that is sized for a 45 watt Marshall. Tight but can be done.
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... ght=dlator
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Build a dlator if you can and adding a line mixer like a Suhr Minimix is the icing on the cakeTomWalsh wrote:Thanks for all the replies! I will try the switch on the back of the M300 and report back. As well as trying a boss type pedal first in the chain.
Realising a buffered effects loop would be best I had a look around and I stumbled across this fx loop that can be installed in an existing tube amp, what do you reckon it'll be like in a dumble amp?
https://www.tube-town.net/ttstore/produ ... ts_id=5973
There's also a tube version with parallel option but I've never heard of the tube used
Tom
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Using the serial/dual input mode didn't solve anything with the volume problem however putting a boss pedal in front solve everything, plus I realised I can use the boss dd3 delays and use other effects (tremolo, chorus) at the same time so that's cool.
As to fitting the d-lator inside the chassis, I have a ceriatone bluesmaster (http://www.ceriatone.com/images/layoutP ... BM-50W.jpg) if I built a d-lator do you reckon I could fit all the components in between the PI and power tubes? Would I get excessive noise by running wires past the PI?
Tom
As to fitting the d-lator inside the chassis, I have a ceriatone bluesmaster (http://www.ceriatone.com/images/layoutP ... BM-50W.jpg) if I built a d-lator do you reckon I could fit all the components in between the PI and power tubes? Would I get excessive noise by running wires past the PI?
Tom
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
I got one in here:
It was crowded but it got done.
The tube and related circuitry are under the speaker jacks, middle rear.
It was crowded but it got done.
The tube and related circuitry are under the speaker jacks, middle rear.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
I don't know if I would try to do it just yet bro, you have things sorted out as is. Maybe play it for a while and see if it continues to meet your needs.TomWalsh wrote:Using the serial/dual input mode didn't solve anything with the volume problem however putting a boss pedal in front solve everything, plus I realised I can use the boss dd3 delays and use other effects (tremolo, chorus) at the same time so that's cool.
As to fitting the d-lator inside the chassis, I have a ceriatone bluesmaster (http://www.ceriatone.com/images/layoutP ... BM-50W.jpg) if I built a d-lator do you reckon I could fit all the components in between the PI and power tubes? Would I get excessive noise by running wires past the PI?
Tom
On the other hand...
Would be a very cool thing if I had built mine in my D-style. Would be cool to see you do it and post pics and updates...
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Holy crap bro!Teleguy61 wrote:I got one in here:
It was crowded but it got done.
The tube and related circuitry are under the speaker jacks, middle rear.
Got any more pics of the whole project? I would like to see more.
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
Here are some more.
No relays, OD and PAB switches, also switches for Midboost, Fat/Thin mid, and three step OD entrance.
Full/half power switch on rear panel.
Kitchen sink probably in there somewhere.
No relays, OD and PAB switches, also switches for Midboost, Fat/Thin mid, and three step OD entrance.
Full/half power switch on rear panel.
Kitchen sink probably in there somewhere.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Strange volume problem using rack effect in passive loop
So do you have a channel foot switch?Teleguy61 wrote:Here are some more.
No relays, OD and PAB switches, also switches for Midboost, Fat/Thin mid, and three step OD entrance.
Full/half power switch on rear panel.
Kitchen sink probably in there somewhere.
What's the LMH switch? I can't make out the 2 resistors wired into it but they look like two 270k's split.
Props to you for jamming that in there and making it still quiet. That would scare me,
Thanks for the pics bro!