Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
skyboltone
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Sparks, NV, where nowhere looks like home.

Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by skyboltone »

Dana:
You wrote in another thread:
"I would build it exactly like the liverpool (Front end, PI and PA). 8k tranny would work fine but I think if you went with a 10k it might even be a little closer to sounding and playing like a Liverpool. I have heard a liverpool played at 1/2 power (2 x tubes) and it still sounded great! I don't think you'll ever get the Marshall 18watt PI and power amp values to sound like a wreck. Just my 2 cents"

I have a couple of 10500 ohm 6V6 OTs out of Hammond organ AO-49 amps. I had planned on doing a 6v6 express (like Kelly's A1b) using that iron. What is it in particular that you will gain using that sort of PP load on 6BQ5's? Maybe my iron is better spent on a Liverpool.

Thanks in advance for the reply
Dan H
The Last of the World's Great Human Beings
Seek immediate medical attention if you suddenly go either deaf or blind.
If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years time there would be a shortage of sand.
User avatar
Noel Grassy
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:29 am
Location: Vacuum Tube Valley-Cali

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by Noel Grassy »

Skyboltone, I also have at least one of those, does your thoughts re: Liverpool build utilize four output tubes or two? It'd be great to get those old xfmrs honkin'? Their former life never hinted at such posibilities. :wink:
All excellent things are as difficult as they are rare__B Spinoza
User avatar
skyboltone
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Sparks, NV, where nowhere looks like home.

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by skyboltone »

Noel Grassy wrote:Skyboltone, I also have at least one of those, does your thoughts re: Liverpool build utilize four output tubes or two? It'd be great to get those old xfmrs honkin'? Their former life never hinted at such posibilities. :wink:
Well, I can't imagine 10500 on parallel 6V6s so no, just a pair. I been farting around with an AO-35 (8500 primary OT w/EL-84s) inside the original chassis for awhile. I got it sorta nice but it's got a way to go before I'll turn it over to my son. Right now it's got a 1/2 12AX7 stage, followed by a Leo Fender single nob tone/volume control, followed by a 100K/10K second triode stage with no cathode cap, into a long tailed 12AU7.

Next I'm gonna try to parallel the first AX7, use 1/2 a second one in the no cathode cap configuration, followed by a cathodyne PI and then on to the EL-84s. Who knows where it all leads. I'm learnin' stuff too.
The Last of the World's Great Human Beings
Seek immediate medical attention if you suddenly go either deaf or blind.
If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years time there would be a shortage of sand.
User avatar
UR12
Posts: 1570
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:22 pm

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by UR12 »

skyboltone wrote:Dana:
You wrote in another thread:
"I would build it exactly like the liverpool (Front end, PI and PA). 8k tranny would work fine but I think if you went with a 10k it might even be a little closer to sounding and playing like a Liverpool. I have heard a liverpool played at 1/2 power (2 x tubes) and it still sounded great! I don't think you'll ever get the Marshall 18watt PI and power amp values to sound like a wreck. Just my 2 cents"

I have a couple of 10500 ohm 6V6 OTs out of Hammond organ AO-49 amps. I had planned on doing a 6v6 express (like Kelly's A1b) using that iron. What is it in particular that you will gain using that sort of PP load on 6BQ5's? Maybe my iron is better spent on a Liverpool.

Thanks in advance for the reply
Dan H
I just thought that would be a good starting point for comparison between the original Liverpool (4 El84's running 5.2K) and the 15 watt version with only 2 El84s running at 10.4k. You will gain having the same matching impedance that you had on 4 tubes so in theory if we keep the proportions the same. Your plate load doubles when going to 2 tubes so why not match that with the proportional increase in primary impedance, all other things staying the same (Bias, Plate and screen voltages). You could also run a 5.2k tranny and lable the 4/8/16 ohm secondaries to 8/16/32 ohms. Either way should couple the same amount of power and frequencey response as the original 5.2k and 4 El84s had. I think I would stick with a 5.2k or 6.6k with the 6v6s for a Express style amp. 8)
User avatar
novosibir
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by novosibir »

skyboltone wrote:Next I'm gonna try to parallel the first AX7, use 1/2 a second one in the no cathode cap configuration, followed by a cathodyne PI and then on to the EL-84s. Who knows where it all leads. I'm learnin' stuff too.
I've tried this in my amp builds - Dr. Z does it (at least in some amp models), Vic does it in the Mojave Peacemaker...

... but I always went back to a single triode. I found, that a single triode is sounding more organic, whereas a doubled triode is too much pronouncing the higher mids - it's too much 'into your face' IMO.

Also read this:

http://members.aol.com/sbench102/dax7.html

Larry
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
User avatar
skyboltone
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Sparks, NV, where nowhere looks like home.

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by skyboltone »

UR12 wrote:I just thought that would be a good starting point for comparison between the original Liverpool (4 El84's running 5.2K) and the 15 watt version with only 2 El84s running at 10.4k. You will gain having the same matching impedance that you had on 4 tubes so in theory if we keep the proportions the same. Your plate load doubles when going to 2 tubes so why not match that with the proportional increase in primary impedance, all other things staying the same (Bias, Plate and screen voltages). You could also run a 5.2k tranny and lable the 4/8/16 ohm secondaries to 8/16/32 ohms. Either way should couple the same amount of power and frequencey response as the original 5.2k and 4 El84s had. I think I would stick with a 5.2k or 6.6k with the 6v6s for a Express style amp. 8)
Ok, thanks. I get it. The Hammond Amps are odd in that they use 368-0-368 (at 117) for the PS and 10500 on the OT with 6V6s. In the AO-35 they use 290-0-290 on the PT and 8500 on the OT with EL-84s. The OT in both cases is definitely a 20 watt max size. The PTs are huge though, I've put 230MA on one for two hours with no appreciable heating. I'm so cheap I'm gonna use this stuff on something, one way or another. Zener the center tap and redesign the bias supply etc. I have a Fisher 6600 OT for the express build. From my reading here I think that 6.6K is the preferred OT for these, true?

And Larry, thanks for the distortion analysis information. I've copied it to file and will study it some more as I work out the details of this little amp. It's definitely not well balanced tonally in it's current iteration, but I have more ideas to try.

Dan H
The Last of the World's Great Human Beings
Seek immediate medical attention if you suddenly go either deaf or blind.
If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years time there would be a shortage of sand.
harryk
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:50 pm

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by harryk »

:D Hi guys! Because I got my Liverpool 2xEL84 project to the phase where it is only missing a cab, I can start to think my next Twreck project. I am somehow stuck mentally with it`s design and philosofy. I would like to do now original Express with 6V6 tubes. My question is: What are spesifications for PT? What are needed secondary voltages - is it 2x260V to get it right? A help here is much appreciated. Regards Harry
User avatar
skyboltone
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Sparks, NV, where nowhere looks like home.

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by skyboltone »

harryk wrote::D Hi guys! Because I got my Liverpool 2xEL84 project to the phase where it is only missing a cab, I can start to think my next Twreck project. I am somehow stuck mentally with it`s design and philosofy. I would like to do now original Express with 6V6 tubes. My question is: What are spesifications for PT? What are needed secondary voltages - is it 2x260V to get it right? A help here is much appreciated. Regards Harry
Well, the Kelly and Francesca scheme shows 585, or 292.5-0-292.5. But Dana talks about using lower voltages so he's the man here I think.
The Last of the World's Great Human Beings
Seek immediate medical attention if you suddenly go either deaf or blind.
If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years time there would be a shortage of sand.
User avatar
UR12
Posts: 1570
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:22 pm

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by UR12 »

skyboltone wrote: I'm so cheap I'm gonna use this stuff on something, one way or another. Zener the center tap and redesign the bias supply etc. I have a Fisher 6600 OT for the express build. From my reading here I think that 6.6K is the preferred OT for these, true?


Dan H
I would use it also, free or otherwise. :lol: Granted they may not have the same stack size, the same type of steel, the same interleaves , etc, etc but you really don't know what they are going to sound like until you try them. I used a OT in my Junkyard Express that I knew nothing about except that it came out of an amp that was running 2 x EL34s. Turned out that it worked so well that we had a hell of a time trying to figure out why it sounded better than the rest we tried. Sometimes you just got to go with what you have on the shelf and if it works then great, and if it don't, then try something else. I think that you really need to listen to both the 5.2k and the 6.6k and determine what sounds good to you. The difference is subtle and not night and day. You get a little more responsiveness and bite at 5.2K and the 6.6k rolls off a little of the bite but is not as responsive. That doesn't mean that a 6.6k isn't responsive or or th 5.2k lets the amp breakup earlier on the VOL knob. You just got to try it and see what sounds good and responds to your ears and axe. You might want to go one way for a Strat and the other for a LP.

That's a good one Fisher OT in a Fisher TW :lol: That has to be the Perfered way to go. :wink:
harryk wrote::D Hi guys! Because I got my Liverpool 2xEL84 project to the phase where it is only missing a cab, I can start to think my next Twreck project. I am somehow stuck mentally with it`s design and philosofy. I would like to do now original Express with 6V6 tubes. My question is: What are spesifications for PT? What are needed secondary voltages - is it 2x260V to get it right? A help here is much appreciated. Regards Harry
No, I would go with a 300-0-300 just like the Express. The Express sounds great with 6V6s. I would also use a fixed bias and supply like the Express.
harryk
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:50 pm

Re: Hey Dana, OT transformer primary choices

Post by harryk »

:) Thanks Dana of your help. My fingers are burning to do one real Express for myself. I am quite sure that there will be troubles on the building way, but with you here in this forum life is little easier in Twreck Wonderland. Harry
Post Reply