6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

airfrankenstein
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:47 pm

6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by airfrankenstein »

Hi all,

I've built a spitfire/creme brulee using a 6L6 output stage and am looking for advice regarding the phase inverter. Currently it's the vox long-tail design : 1meg plates, 1K2 cathode, and 47k tail.
I reduced the tail resistor to 10k.

Would there be any reason to switch to a fender long-tail design, will this change harmonics, gain?
amp is cathode biased.

thanks for any insight, learning hands on.
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by M Fowler »

The 1k2 makes the amp brighter and gong to 10k tail added gain.

Changing out those two resistors can really change the nature of your amp, maybe 820R and 24k.
airfrankenstein
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:47 pm

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by airfrankenstein »

thanks !
Jana
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:40 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by Jana »

1 meg plates? :shock: :?:
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by M Fowler »

Jana wrote:1 meg plates? :shock: :?:
:lol: Phase inverter grids, thanks for keeping components labelled correctly Jana. :)
airfrankenstein
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:47 pm

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by airfrankenstein »

sorry you're absolutely right
ampfab
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:00 pm
Location: chicago il

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by ampfab »

I had built a spitfire type amp and i installed a switch and a few extra components so that i could switch between the vox style PI and the fender/marshall style PI. there was a noticable tone/harmonics change and a gain change. the fender/marshall style PI had more gain and a thicker deeper tone. it was useful when tayloring the tone to different guitars.
Congress Park Amps
airfrankenstein
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:47 pm

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by airfrankenstein »

I think I might try the same to toggle between a 470cathode/10k tail and a 1K2 cathode/47k tail.
Did you use a 2pdt, 3pdt ?
Would you happen to have a layout/schematic of how that get's wired up?
ampfab
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:00 pm
Location: chicago il

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by ampfab »

I believe that i used a DPDT switch to parallel a 1.0k resistor onto the 1.2k resistor to obtain a resistance close to 470 ohms. the opposite side of the switch I paralleled a 15k or 12k resistor onto the 47k resistor to drop the resistance to near 10k.
Congress Park Amps
airfrankenstein
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:47 pm

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by airfrankenstein »

what power tubes did you use ? el84?
ampfab
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:00 pm
Location: chicago il

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by ampfab »

El84.
Congress Park Amps
Gaz
Posts: 1146
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:27 am

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by Gaz »

The reason that a Vox, Fender, or Marshall have different cathode resistors is not arbitrary, it's to achieve a particular bias point for the LTP depending on the B+ voltage and tube type. The Vox has a larger bias resistor to achieve roughly a center bias point with the its lower B+ voltage (compared to say a Marshall.
ampfab
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:00 pm
Location: chicago il

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by ampfab »

Marshall, vox, fender, Gibson,matchless, and countless others seem to use the similar values in all different situations. I get the idea that putting a vox LTP in front of a marshall or fender power tube configuration is not "wrong". Many would say that using a 470k plate resistor on a 12ax7 is "wrong", but I've definitely seen it done. Balanced isn't necessarily best. Am I right or wrong? What are the values on the marshal 18w LTP? I believe that they are typical marshall, the marshall 18w has similar b+ as the vox.
Congress Park Amps
Gaz
Posts: 1146
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:27 am

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by Gaz »

You're correct that there is no wrong or right (as long as nothing goes up in smoke), but I was just pointing out that things weren't always tweaked for tonal reasons, especially when it comes to phase inverters. . T

You're wrong about the 18W. The values are much different than a typical Marshall (why didn't you just Google the schematic?). Bias has nothing to do with balance of the splitter either.
ampfab
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:00 pm
Location: chicago il

Re: 6L6 spitfire/creme brulee variant : phase inverter question

Post by ampfab »

i guess i cant rely on my memory about the 18w. certainly changing the tail and cathode resistor with not cause the circuit to go up in smoke. i would still encourage the OP to experiment.
Congress Park Amps
Post Reply