Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- LeftyStrat
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Marietta, SC, but my heart and two of my kids are in Seattle, WA
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
I posted this link a while back:
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?t=17830
It was suggested to me ages ago, by who, I don't remember, that this was similar to the Winterland. It certainly shares some similarities to the Odyssey.
Again another case of anode followers.
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?t=17830
It was suggested to me ages ago, by who, I don't remember, that this was similar to the Winterland. It certainly shares some similarities to the Odyssey.
Again another case of anode followers.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
-
vibratoking
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
I think the term 'anode follower' is silly, but I also know of papers that have been written using that term! I thought it was silly many years ago.
'Anode follower' is ridiculous IMO. A cathode follower is technically known as a common anode gain stage. Cathode follower came about in a slang sort of way because the output taken at the cathode 'follows' the input - same phase and approximately a gain of 1. In the 'anode follower' case, the output taken at the anode does not 'follow' the input in any way whatsoever. This makes 'anode follower' misleading and incorrect IMO.
This is not a tomato tomahto thing. This is really about using language that is descriptive, accurate, and not misleading.
'Anode follower' is ridiculous IMO. A cathode follower is technically known as a common anode gain stage. Cathode follower came about in a slang sort of way because the output taken at the cathode 'follows' the input - same phase and approximately a gain of 1. In the 'anode follower' case, the output taken at the anode does not 'follow' the input in any way whatsoever. This makes 'anode follower' misleading and incorrect IMO.
This is not a tomato tomahto thing. This is really about using language that is descriptive, accurate, and not misleading.
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
+1I think the term 'anode follower' is silly, but I also know of papers that have been written using that term! I thought it was silly many years ago.
'Anode follower' is ridiculous IMO. A cathode follower is technically known as a common anode gain stage. Cathode follower came about in a slang sort of way because the output taken at the cathode 'follows' the input - same phase and approximately a gain of 1. In the 'anode follower' case, the output taken at the anode does not 'follow' the input in any way whatsoever. This makes 'anode follower' misleading and incorrect IMO.
This is not a tomato tomahto thing. This is really about using language that is descriptive, accurate, and not misleading.
The term follower ie," cathode follower" is used to quantify identical phase relationships..Hence the term follower.
http://www.freewebs.com/valvewizard/accf.html
Have a Good One!!
Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
- LeftyStrat
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Marietta, SC, but my heart and two of my kids are in Seattle, WA
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
Yeah, that term always confused the heck out of me.
But it seems the two configurations; post-pi driver vs post-pi cathode follower have different goals?
The DC driven CF eliminates the coupling cap, and thus the associated blocking distortion, whereas the post-pi driver is to hit the power tubes harder.
Correct?
But it seems the two configurations; post-pi driver vs post-pi cathode follower have different goals?
The DC driven CF eliminates the coupling cap, and thus the associated blocking distortion, whereas the post-pi driver is to hit the power tubes harder.
Correct?
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
- LeftyStrat
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Marietta, SC, but my heart and two of my kids are in Seattle, WA
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
Here's a design that uses pentodes as post-pi cathode followers:
http://ken-gilbert.com/the-big-ass-guitar-amplifier
600 watts!
http://ken-gilbert.com/the-big-ass-guitar-amplifier
600 watts!
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
On paper this might be correct (I don't know). But AFAIR my personal perception it was exactly the other way round: A Dumbleland Special 150W kind of power amp e.g. with some version of such a kind of "non-CF" 12AU7 / 12BH7 configuration was in my personal perception clearer and purer sounding than some SSS 150W with the 7025 / 7025 "CF" power amp version (12AU7 /12BH7 versions of the Steel String Singer 150W exist, too) in direct comparision. Exactly as Alexander Dumble statet: "silky clean" - at least without the filters set up for a more "glassy" tone and without intentionally driving the preamp into distortion: ("I actually started making a series of amplifiers called the Dumbleland in about '66...it was a design way ahead of its time. It was too much power and too silky clean for people. It's perfect for Stevie Ray, though." ) http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/s ... /Articles/FUCHSAUDIO wrote:Advantage of the CF arrangement is ... increasing overall amp clarity.
Cheers,
Max
- FUCHSAUDIO
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
- Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
- Contact:
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
Interesting Max. Not having tried both circuits (especially not side-by-side in the same amp under the same conditions), I was only speculating. Might be fun to make a chassis up with both circuits and do a direct comparison.
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
MaxA Dumbleland Special 150W kind of power amp
I believe at one point you mention your desert island amp as being such a Dumbleand..Does your DI Dumbleland have this driver circuit in it you mention..
Thanks..On paper this might be correct (I don't know). But AFAIR my personal perception it was exactly the other way round: A Dumbleland Special 150W kind of power amp e.g. with some version of such a kind of "non-CF" 12AU7 / 12BH7 configuration was in my personal perception clearer and purer sounding than some SSS 150W
Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
Tony, if you buy one for me and carry it around (and the shoes of plus one?) on the island along with a 4x12" - Yes!talbany wrote:Does your DI Dumbleland have this driver circuit in it you mention..
- "this driver" in the sense, that I'm sure that the plates of the 12BH7 are cap coupled to the grids of the power tubes. But all the other details might be more or less different from what is shown in this Odyssey schematic.
BTW: If a Dumbleland Special 150W shouldn't be available, a SSS 150W with a 12AU7 / 12BH7 configuration might find a taker, too. And in a pinch perhaps even a 300SL.
Cheers,
Max
- LeftyStrat
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Marietta, SC, but my heart and two of my kids are in Seattle, WA
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
I think might be the guilty party for using the term 'anode follower.' Upon further reading:
http://www.aikenamps.com/anode.pdf
An anode follower always has negative feedback, which is not the case with these post-pi plate coupled drivers.
I also found an interesting discussion of the post pi cf in the SVT here:
http://music-electronics-forum.com/t23357/
The most enlightening quote:
"I think the cathode followers in the SVT are there mainly to drive the bias feed resistors, which have to be a low value to avoid thermal runaway of all those paralleled tubes."
Of course, that wouldn't explain why it was done in an amp like the Heathkit W6M, which has a single set of 6550's.
http://www.aikenamps.com/anode.pdf
An anode follower always has negative feedback, which is not the case with these post-pi plate coupled drivers.
I also found an interesting discussion of the post pi cf in the SVT here:
http://music-electronics-forum.com/t23357/
The most enlightening quote:
"I think the cathode followers in the SVT are there mainly to drive the bias feed resistors, which have to be a low value to avoid thermal runaway of all those paralleled tubes."
Of course, that wouldn't explain why it was done in an amp like the Heathkit W6M, which has a single set of 6550's.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
-
vibratoking
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
Lefty - I saw that article many years ago. What they are describing in that paper ain't a follower. Their terminology is incorrect IMO.
- LeftyStrat
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Marietta, SC, but my heart and two of my kids are in Seattle, WA
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
So exactly what IS an anode follower?vibratoking wrote:Lefty - I saw that article many years ago. What they are describing in that paper ain't a follower. Their terminology is incorrect IMO.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
-
vibratoking
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
IMO, an anode follower cannot not exist. The anode part indicates that the output comes off the anode, so it MUST be inverted compared to the input at the grid. The follower part indicates that the output has the same amplitude and phase as the input i.e the output is exactly the SAME as the input. The term is an oxymoron.
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
AFAIR you'll meet "inverter / driver" circuits at least in these Dumble amps:
12AU7 / 12BH7 Odyssey (Concert, Bass, Special):
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... 153#219153
https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=13132
https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=17340
https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=15536
https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=13170
12AU7 / 12BH7 Winterland:
http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/s ... 20%230003/
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... 443#219443
12AU7 / 12BH7 Dumbleland Special 150W
12AU7 / 12BH7 Dumbleland Bass 150W
12AU7 / 2 x 12BH7 Dumbleland 300SL
12AU7 / 2 x 12BH7 8 x 6550A Winterland power amp
12AU7 / 12BH7 SSS 150W:
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?p=66244#66244
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?p=66426#66426
7025 / 7025 SSS 150W: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?p=66244#66244
7025 / 7025 "Silver Alligator" EF 86 Dumbleland
7025 / 7025 SSS 100W: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... 738#204738
7025 / 7025 ODS 150W
And AFAIR sometimes the feel and timbre of the clean sound of two specimens of the 7025 / 7025 amps is less similar than the timbre and feel of two other specimens - one with some 7025 / 7025 version, and one with some 12AU7 / 12BH7 version. So the 7025 / 7025 configurations all might be more or less different in technical detail and perhaps all the 12AU7 / 12BH7 configurations, too?
So IMO generalizations like "7025 / 7025 Dumble power amps sound like this" and "12AU7 / 12BH7 Dumble power amps sound like that" might be inappropriate.
But as sometimes it's known what kind of Dumble amp has been used for a live performance or a recording (some examples: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?p=66244#66244 ) you all can get a personal impression in regard to what differences you perceive between the overall sound of some original Dumble amps with different "inverter / driver" circuits.
Cheers,
Max
12AU7 / 12BH7 Odyssey (Concert, Bass, Special):
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... 153#219153
https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=13132
https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=17340
https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=15536
https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=13170
12AU7 / 12BH7 Winterland:
http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/s ... 20%230003/
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... 443#219443
12AU7 / 12BH7 Dumbleland Special 150W
12AU7 / 12BH7 Dumbleland Bass 150W
12AU7 / 2 x 12BH7 Dumbleland 300SL
12AU7 / 2 x 12BH7 8 x 6550A Winterland power amp
12AU7 / 12BH7 SSS 150W:
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?p=66244#66244
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?p=66426#66426
7025 / 7025 SSS 150W: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?p=66244#66244
7025 / 7025 "Silver Alligator" EF 86 Dumbleland
7025 / 7025 SSS 100W: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... 738#204738
7025 / 7025 ODS 150W
And AFAIR sometimes the feel and timbre of the clean sound of two specimens of the 7025 / 7025 amps is less similar than the timbre and feel of two other specimens - one with some 7025 / 7025 version, and one with some 12AU7 / 12BH7 version. So the 7025 / 7025 configurations all might be more or less different in technical detail and perhaps all the 12AU7 / 12BH7 configurations, too?
So IMO generalizations like "7025 / 7025 Dumble power amps sound like this" and "12AU7 / 12BH7 Dumble power amps sound like that" might be inappropriate.
But as sometimes it's known what kind of Dumble amp has been used for a live performance or a recording (some examples: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?p=66244#66244 ) you all can get a personal impression in regard to what differences you perceive between the overall sound of some original Dumble amps with different "inverter / driver" circuits.
Cheers,
Max
Re: Anyone done a PI driver with 6V6's?
In the Odyssey schematic the one plate load for the 12AU7 is not 4.7k; looks more like 17k or 27k...
TT
TT