Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Cliff Schecht
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:32 am
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by Cliff Schecht »

So why not work up a circuit that automatically corrects for AC and/or dc imbalance? This sort of servo circuit is relatively common on both the hifi world and in IC design..
Cliff Schecht - Circuit P.I.
User avatar
boldaslove6789
Posts: 957
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:52 pm
Location: Near Dallas, TX

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by boldaslove6789 »

In my expieriences with every D-style amp I've been around, fine tuning the best and most musical amount of harmonic feedback content has always been executed by this method:

Measure both sides of the PI trim, adjust to 7-9 AC volts apart, pwr amp being the prodominemt side.

Make slight adjustment if needed when the amp is loud enough to feedback.Use your ear to determine the amps best and most musical harmonic feedback. Using either a Tele or Les Paul middle position (a bridge and neck pup combo (If it will feedback in the middle position it will do it mucho more in the bridge position.)

Is this just me that does it that way?
Last edited by boldaslove6789 on Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
bluesfendermanblues
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Dumble City, Europe

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by bluesfendermanblues »

I use both the technical/analytic approach + hereafter fine tuning by ear.

1) Technical/analytic
a) Put a dummy on 'speaker out'
b) put a 1000 hz tone on power amp input (the 'return' jack)
c) measure AC at PI out (after 100n or 22n caps)/PWR tube input grids
d) adjust PI trimmer to the same voltage at each cap (with 1v ac in, I get appx 2 x 20VAC after the PI).
e) make a small dot on the trimmer with a sharpie pen.

Balancing the PI trimmer perfectly in regards to measured AC voltage, will only take you part of the way to 'feedback nirvana', since output tubes are never fully matched/balanced and neither are OT's. Therefore,
you need to fine tune by ear.

2) Fine tune by ear
I use my guitar at a 'bright' setting, just like boldaslove and use very, very small increments around the dot on the trimmer to get max high end - its very easy to finde the sweet spot, once you have a base (the small dot on the trimmer) to work from.

I find that above mentioned approach takes the voodoo out of PI adjusting.
Diva or not? - Respect for Mr. D's work....)
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by martin manning »

very good and succinct description Fenderman! One comment I have is that the reference dot on the trimmer is only good for the particular PI tube installed and at its immediate state of deterioration. Maybe the dot should be made with a non-permanent marking device?
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by talbany »

Cliff Schecht wrote:So why not work up a circuit that automatically corrects for AC and/or dc imbalance? This sort of servo circuit is relatively common on both the hifi world and in IC design..
In the Hifi world a slight imbalance is actually preferred!

I came across a most intriguing article called The Ultimate, by Rickard Berglund of Hoor Sweden, in Sound Practices magazine, Winter 94/95.(sorry out of print and not on the web) Mr. Berglund claims that by reducing the AC drive to one output tubes in a push-pull output stage by approximately 2.3dB, while maintaining DC balance, you get the distortion spectrum of a single ended amp. More specifically, you get back the even harmonics, with the highly desirable second harmonic being significantly higher than the third. You then have a better and more natural sounding harmonic distortion spectrum, and most of the efficiency of the push-pull topology...(note)What is most interesting about the article is Berglung talks about the slight imbalance.. Clearly the HIfi world is more concerned with the proper imbalancing and a dominant 2nd order harmonic spectrum..
So the 10k question being, what is it that actually promotes the bloom (whatever) effect?..Is it the perfect balancing (conduction) of a push pull OPT section or is it the slight imbalance or balance of 2nd to 3rd order harmonics ratio

I vote harmonics!!..

As far as DC Balance in guitar amps>> I believe a small amount of core saturation is a good thing..I suppose this could be argued..

I hope this makes some sense!!

Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
User avatar
greiswig
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by greiswig »

boldaslove6789 wrote: Measure both sides of the PI trim, adjust to 7-9 AC volts apart, pwr amp being the prodominemt side.
We're really hijacking this thread in a way, as there are other threads that discuss the PI adjustment in detail. But at the risk of adding to the hijack...

As I was doing the method that I described earlier in this thread (measuring and labeling tubes for the PI), I noticed that the DC imbalance varies greatly from tube to tube. See https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... mmer+volts
-g
John_P_WI
Posts: 1457
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by John_P_WI »

talbany wrote:
Cliff Schecht wrote:So why not work up a circuit that automatically corrects for AC and/or dc imbalance? This sort of servo circuit is relatively common on both the hifi world and in IC design..
In the Hifi world a slight imbalance is actually preferred!

I came across a most intriguing article called The Ultimate, by Rickard Berglund of Hoor Sweden, in Sound Practices magazine, Winter 94/95.(sorry out of print and not on the web) Mr. Berglund claims that by reducing the AC drive to one output tubes in a push-pull output stage..... Tony
KOC has promoted this for years as a "Body" control (although not specific in terms of db "down"), in which Peavey copied and subsequently patented....
Max
Posts: 1579
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 6:08 pm

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by Max »

Hi,

here's what Alexander Dumble recommended concerning the adjustment of the "dynamic balance" (as he calls this) controls of many of his amps:

https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... 221#134221

Cheers,

Max
vibratoking
Posts: 2640
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by vibratoking »

1) Technical/analytic
a) Put a dummy on 'speaker out'
b) put a 1000 hz tone on power amp input (the 'return' jack)
c) measure AC at PI out (after 100n or 22n caps)/PWR tube input grids
d) adjust PI trimmer to the same voltage at each cap (with 1v ac in, I get appx 2 x 20VAC after the PI).
e) make a small dot on the trimmer with a sharpie pen.
That's what I am doing, but I only get about 6.5VAC after the caps? Do you really measure 20VAC? I've looked at it with a scope and DMM, same readings. I've also rolled many tubes and get approximately the same AC voltage.
Max
Posts: 1579
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 6:08 pm

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by Max »

Hi,

here's a schematic of an Ampeg SVT with a description of the kind of calibration procedure that Alexander Dumble once recommended to use when adjusting the "dynamic balance" pots of his amps. You'll find the description of the "CALIBRATION PROCEDURE" on the right side of the schematic. And in the schematic you'll see where exactly in the circuit the voltages given in this description have to be measured.

According to what Alexander once recommended, this general kind of procedure can be used for the adjustment of all his amps with an internal or external "dynamic balance" pot.

For adjusting a Dumbleland 300SL you can use exactly this procedure. For adjusting other Dumble amps, of course you'll have to calculate the appropriate voltages.

Cheers,

Max
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by Structo »

This print is a bit easier to read.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
vibratoking
Posts: 2640
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Quinn SDO-Reverb 183/102

Post by vibratoking »

I answered my own question from above. I was not getting ~20VAC as mentioned above for two reasons that should have been obvious to me. :oops:

1 - I was putting a 1V peak to peak signal into the PI not 1VAC RMS.
2 - I am guessing that my output tubes are not biased as hot as the ones previously mentioned.

With a 1VAC RMS signal into the PI, I get about 16.5VAC measured after the PI coupling caps. I still cannot dial in the PI to my expectations. I feel like the amp requires too much volume to get to a decent level of feedback. I could be wrong here, but that is what I am working toward. On problem is that my 6L6 Winged Cs are not balanced well enough. I did put in a 20k multiturn pot. The multiturn is the right type pot IMO to reduce the sensitivity of the knob and get repeatable results. I also looked at the frequency spectrum at the speaker output into a dummy load using a digital scope with FFT capabilities. The results are interesting but not conclusive, yet. My next move is to find a better set of output tubes and bring home a network analyzer to make some investigations. I will post some plots and conclusions when I get to that point.
User avatar
Luthierwnc
Posts: 998
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:59 am
Location: Asheville, NC

variation on loop cable cap box

Post by Luthierwnc »

Hi All,

I was in Lowes the other day and the 40-watt bulb went on over my head when I saw this. It is an inline switch that you would attach to a lamp cord. Usually they are quite small but this unit looked like it had some room to work inside. I had to remove a supporting plastic node along the lower channel to cram everything in but it worked out fine. When reassembled the ends pinch the cables secure.

I soldered a .0022 cap to the signal wire. The other end of the cap is screwed to the switch contact. On the opposite side, the ground is screwed to the other contact. A Sharpie dot on top tells me whether it's on or off.

Just a thought, Skip
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply