Hi Sven,
It is stated on this forum that Vishay Dale RN65 resistors, metal film, are desirable. However, on colored layouts there are several types of resistors drawn. One could easily assume that Power supply resistors, the ones rated 2W or 3W and such, are to be metal oxide types, while it is not quite clear which of the two drawn types are metal film and which are carbon film and such, in other circuits? Could that be established?
I think my build has carbonfilm dropping string resistors.
Second, it is stated on this forum that preferrence is towards use of SBE Orange drop PS capacitors. Those are polyester capacitors, rated 400V and 600V. OK, but what is the story with Xicon MPP series, that are polypropylene resistors, and how do they compare to the Orange drops PS series? Or, are there parts of networks that could use one vs. the other type (Orange drop PS vs. Xicon MPP) of capacitors?
On my Express build the Xicons were little bit smoother than the OD715's IMO. I have explained the change from 715's to PS of my OD-build on this thread.
Would someone clarify.
I'm sure You can find a lot relating to this with the search function, but of cource its very nice to read more comments regarding to the ultimate caps for the build.
Regarding the subject of this thread, one should state that the ¨sloppy 96¨ sound clip is the best sounding sound clip IMO, on this forum, and therefore qualifies this particular schematics of this particular amplifier as the best one for this type of sound, as played by the guitarist. That is as much as small computer speakers can reveal ... but, those are the same conditions used to listen to other clips as well ...
Don't know about the playing (it IS sloppy) but I'm quite happy how the amp sounds nowdays
Therefore, the questions are:
Is this Hybrid A schmatic? By the way, according to statements from some other earlier theread, Hybrid A schematic is the same as Non-HRM schematic. Is that true? Anyway, what exactly is the schematic of this particular good sounding amplifier? Shall it, or shall it not be revealed? If not, OK, fine ... if yes, can it be done here, in THIS thread ... without references to other threads, files, etc.? Without the runaround. If it is personal confidence, fine, but if not, can it be done without the runaround. After all, THIS particular sound is merely MY own favorite, which does not mean that other people like it as much, or whatever ...
Again, explained on this thread..
Needless to say, the clip in question sounds good also due to the fact that the playing is good, and that the instrument sounds-preforms good, obviously ... while the only objection for this type of amp demonstration sound clips, is that the recording is way too wet (too much reverb). Demonstration of an amp is much better with no reverb, or, perhaps, just a bit of reverb from the amplifier itself.
From the first post of this thread:
Reverb is from the amp. Delay added in Cubase.
In couple of places You can hear the amps feedback (that I like so much

) - don't take that as reverb
In my particular case, I would NOT like to have the version of this amplifier with a reverb. I would like to have as simple as possible, passive (supposedly) FX loop. The FX loop would really not need any boost, since it would be used for plugging in an analog delay type of guitar pedal. It seems that if guitar signal is sufficient to drive such a pedal, it would obviously be well ¨supplied¨ with a signal from the first amplification stage (is that where passive FX loops are introduced in these amps?).
I was not happy by putting my reverb on 'passive' loop. I leave this on the more experienced fellows.
All the best,
Sven
Same to You,