Low power options

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
chrisc
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:03 am
Location: Ennis Texas

Low power options

Post by chrisc »

Hey everyone,
Ive been a long time lurker and Ive posted a few times here and there.
This is by far my favorite forum to visit and glean info and ideas from so I figured Id ask you guys to help me with my next project.

Im looking for a low power amp in the 1-3 watt range to use in Church. Ive been using a single ended EL34 amp and its just too much, even putting a 6V6 in there doesn't knock it down enough.
The express or rocket pre-amps are what Im leaning toward but I really need some input for the power section. I only have 3 design goals. #1 not sound like garbage. #2 Get a great crunch tone at manageable levels #3 use what I have on hand. If i have to buy something else to avoid #1 I will but I'd prefer to save my limited funds on something a little more fun...like another rocket :D

I have a few different OTs but only 1 PT. Its from a valve jr
260-0-260v rms @ 90ma; 6.3V @ 3.5A and needs a bridge recto. That gives me about 340v or so under load.

For the OT i have a Valve Jr OT (5w 7500ohm), a Weber LOPO OT (https://taweber.powweb.com/store/lopo_ot.jpg ),
and hammond 125FSE

For tubes I have 6sh7 and 6sj7 pentodes, or 6BX7gt and 12au7 dual triodes.

I would certainly appreciate any feedback you guys have

Thanks
Chris
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 6048
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Low power options

Post by Phil_S »

Input tube 6SJ7. Dress it similar to the Gibson GA-20. Supply B+ ~150V. There is a tricky voltage divider for the screen and you'll have to play with it to get it sounding right. This tube will give you a nice glassy crunch. It is capable of delivering anything from modestly clean to Jimi, by rolling your guitar volume.

Two gain stages -- figure out how to use the 6BX7 for two sequential gain stages. This is a low gain dual triode, but two sequential sections should do the trick.

Parallel the two triodes in the 12AU7 for SE output at 10K to the Hammond.

I think this will get you about 4W. You can play with the gain stage biasing to reduce the signal to the power stage.

Let's see what else pops up here? You're not making it easy, are you?
User avatar
xtian
Posts: 7263
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Location: Chico, CA
Contact:

Re: Low power options

Post by xtian »

The AX84 Firefly might interest you. Check my build thread: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?t=11248
chrisc
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:03 am
Location: Ennis Texas

Re: Low power options

Post by chrisc »

Sorry I didnt make it clear, the tubes I listed were ones I am thinking of as the power tubes. I just didnt word it very well :oops:
Ive seen 6BX7's and 6SH7's used as low output power tubes in hifi before, and the 12au7 in the firefly.

For the preamp tubes I have tons of tubes. From all kinds of 12ax7's, at7's, 12BZ7's etc... to some nice tung-sol 6SL7's, Ef86's and EF184's just to name a few. So I have that covered. Im either doing an Express or a Rocket for the pre, haven't made up my mind yet. I already have two big bottle rockets, so I might go for the express.

I guess my real question would be, how do some of these low power output sections sound? Ive never had any experience with really low wattage amps and dont know what might fit my need best. The 12au7 or 6BX7 in PP or one of the pentodes in SE? Or parallel one of the twin triodes in SE....Self split push put or traditional PI then Power tube(s).

You can see where im getting buried in the options.


I hope that makes more sense. :)
d95err
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:52 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Low power options

Post by d95err »

I would go for some kind of power scaling.

If you build a very low-powered amp, then regardless of what power output you get, it's bound to be too quiet or too loud. With power scaling, you can dial in exactly the volume level you want, from full power down to whisper levels.
Ian444
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:19 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Low power options

Post by Ian444 »

Maybe 6V6 in triode mode? If thats too much, the power is so low you could put a combination of power resistors with the speaker to reduce the volume further. Probably easier than building a new output stage.
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 6048
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Low power options

Post by Phil_S »

chrisc wrote:Sorry I didnt make it clear, the tubes I listed were ones I am thinking of as the power tubes. I just didnt word it very well :oops:
Ive seen 6BX7's and 6SH7's used as low output power tubes in hifi before, and the 12au7 in the firefly.

For the preamp tubes I have tons of tubes. From all kinds of 12ax7's, at7's, 12BZ7's etc... to some nice tung-sol 6SL7's, Ef86's and EF184's just to name a few. So I have that covered. Im either doing an Express or a Rocket for the pre, haven't made up my mind yet. I already have two big bottle rockets, so I might go for the express.

I guess my real question would be, how do some of these low power output sections sound? Ive never had any experience with really low wattage amps and dont know what might fit my need best. The 12au7 or 6BX7 in PP or one of the pentodes in SE? Or parallel one of the twin triodes in SE....Self split push put or traditional PI then Power tube(s).

You can see where im getting buried in the options.


I hope that makes more sense. :)
This opens up a world of possibilities. I think the legitimate limiting factors are selection of the output tube and the output transformer.

I didn't see a good match to the PP tranny you listed. Two of the OT's you listed are for a SE amp. The 7.5K tranny is really to high for most pentodes and too low for common triodes. The Hammond, with the 10K option is about right for the 12AU7 or 6SN7, with the two sections in SE parallel operation.

The 6BX7, which I never hear of before, looks like it is a 10W tube with a very low internal plate impedance. I don't know how to use this tube, but, from reading the spec sheet, I felt it would be more watts than you are seeking. Don't know about the 6HS7 either.

The 6SJ7 has a very high internal plate impedance. I'm certainly no expert, but I'm thinking it won't be a very good match for those three OT's. It does, however, make a fabulous V1, which is why I suggested it there.

A triode power tube doesn't work particularly well with a PI that gives it a wide voltage swing. I suggest the traditional LTP and the paraphase are both too challenging to match to a triode power section. I would have suggested a concertina PI into PP 12AU7 or a self-split 12AU7, but I think your OT selection is not a good match. This brings me back to the 10K Hammond for SE operation.

From what you offered, I think a 12AU7 in parallel SE will be a decent match to the OT. You don't need a PI for SE. I think you'll need some sort of buffer/tone stack recovery tube after a 6SJ7 input. The 6SL7 or 12AX7 are both easy choices. If I used a tube with that much gain, I would probably bias them for relatively low gain. I think you'll get the most tone shaping options with the tone stack and the "middle" tube. BTW, if you have one, I'd choose a 6SN7 over the 12AU7 for the final tube. The operating parameters are nearly identical, but I think it must be the large plates of the 6SN7 that give it something extra.
chrisc
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:03 am
Location: Ennis Texas

Re: Low power options

Post by chrisc »

D95err

I never considered power scaling. Its been a while since I looked into that. Is london power still the only ones doing it, or is there now a DIY route?

Ian444
I built a bridged T attenuator a few years ago, Ill have to dig it out and try it again. It worked well and sounded pretty good,

Phil_S

I know what you mean about the octal equivalents of the 12A*7's. I have some really really nice 12ax7's but my favorites are the 6SL7's. I might just go grab a 6SN7. Im going to try the 12au7 in SE since i have them on hand and swap it for the 6sn7 later.

The 6BX7 is pin compatible with the 6SN7 it just has higher dissipation. I saw a guy use one in a moonlight with a switch to use the 6SN7. I wouldnt mind trying it but I think it would just be counterproductive if im going for lower power.

The 6Sh7 is very similar to the 6SJ7. Matchless used them in the first gen Clubman. I built one of those a few months ago and really didnt care for it, but now I have a few great 6sh7's laying around.
FunkyE9th
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Low power options

Post by FunkyE9th »

For power scaling, the VVR is nice option... http://hallamplification.com/main.html?src=/#2,2
Post Reply