Best way to impliment a parallel stage

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
rdjones
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:20 am
Location: Music City, TN

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by rdjones »

iknowjohnny wrote:Rob, here is a 18 watt showing a parallel stage ...

http://mhuss.com/18watt/schematics/18minwatt.gif
Fender used the parallel V1 in several "II series" amps, such as the Deluxe Reverb II and Concert.
In these designs the first preamp stage's output is split to feed two tone stacks and the clean/overdrive paths.

http://www.el34world.com/charts/Schemat ... _ii_83.pdf

rd
guitarmike2107
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: East Scotland
Contact:

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by guitarmike2107 »

iknowjohnny wrote:Think i'm gonna pass on this one. Tried it on V1 and now i have it back to 3 stages no parallel and i think it's just cleaner and better like that. Well, learned something anyways. Thanks all.
yes it is cleaner, but most times guitarists dont want cleaner, we want harmonic complexity :D Merlin made a comment some time ago about parralell stages adding more high order harmonics.. maybe I am remembering it wrong though? :D
User avatar
rsalinger
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:17 pm
Location: Aveiro, Portugal

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by rsalinger »

iknowjohnny wrote:Rob, here is a 18 watt showing a parallel stage ...

http://mhuss.com/18watt/schematics/18minwatt.gif
Thanks. That helps to clear things up, in my mind...

Rob
Music is an expression of the inexpressable ~ Vernon Reid, Musician.
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by tubeswell »

guitarmike2107 wrote:
iknowjohnny wrote:Think i'm gonna pass on this one. Tried it on V1 and now i have it back to 3 stages no parallel and i think it's just cleaner and better like that. Well, learned something anyways. Thanks all.
yes it is cleaner, but most times guitarists dont want cleaner, we want harmonic complexity :D Merlin made a comment some time ago about parralell stages adding more high order harmonics.. maybe I am remembering it wrong though? :D
FWIW in Merlin's 1st book (on preamps), there is a chapter on parallel stages where there are a few different ways of implementing them for different effects
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by iknowjohnny »

tubeswell wrote:
yes it is cleaner, but most times guitarists dont want cleaner
Actually that wasn't a good description. (cleaner) I can't quite explain, but more strident and less smooth....i guess harsh almost describes it for the most part. But if anything i felt it lacked as much complexity as the no paralleled circuit which was a big reason i changed back, so maybe it was the longer wires and interaction or something. I dunno, but i have a box of sozos waiting at home so right now thats all i care about ! been wanting to try these forever.
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by tubeswell »

iknowjohnny wrote:
tubeswell wrote:
yes it is cleaner, but most times guitarists dont want cleaner
Actually that wasn't a good description. (cleaner) I can't quite explain, but more strident and less smooth....i guess harsh almost describes it for the most part. But if anything i felt it lacked as much complexity as the no paralleled circuit which was a big reason i changed back, so maybe it was the longer wires and interaction or something. I dunno, but i have a box of sozos waiting at home so right now thats all i care about ! been wanting to try these forever.
No I didn't say that.

guitarmike2107 wrote that.
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by iknowjohnny »

Sorry bout that.
User avatar
Colossal
Posts: 5205
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Moving through Kashmir

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by Colossal »

FWIW in Merlin's 1st book (on preamps), there is a chapter on parallel stages where there are a few different ways of implementing them for different effects
Merlin does touch on this but one of the cool things to do with a paralleled triode is to have them share a common load resistor but dissimilar bias resistors and bypass caps (if applied). Bias one cathode warmer (such as 680-820R) and other cooler (say 1k5-2k7) for harmonic complexity; let the common grids fight it out over the bias point. With a paralleled setup there is only a slight boost in gain over a single triode but reduced noise with half the load. You could use classic Plexi values such as 820R/330uF and 2k7/0.68uF and the common anode mixing arrangement acts like maxed Bright and Normal channels. You could add a pot in series with the 330uF to ground to act as a Bass control.
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by iknowjohnny »

Colossal wrote:
FWIW in Merlin's 1st book (on preamps), there is a chapter on parallel stages where there are a few different ways of implementing them for different effects
Merlin does touch on this but one of the cool things to do with a paralleled triode is to have them share a common load resistor but dissimilar bias resistors and bypass caps (if applied). Bias one cathode warmer (such as 680-820R) and other cooler (say 1k5-2k7) for harmonic complexity; let the common grids fight it out over the bias point. With a paralleled setup there is only a slight boost in gain over a single triode but reduced noise with half the load. You could use classic Plexi values such as 820R/330uF and 2k7/0.68uF and the common anode mixing arrangement acts like maxed Bright and Normal channels. You could add a pot in series with the 330uF to ground to act as a Bass control.
Have you tried this and if so whats your opinion on it?
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by iknowjohnny »

By the way, the Sozos are the real deal. Probably my #1 target in amp building/tweaking has always been harmonic complexity. I installed them last nite and they really take that up a notch. It's so rich and chewy now it's just a absolute pleasure to play. I would tell anyone, at least anyone building a amp with a cascaded preamp to definitely use sozos if they were set to use mallory. Can't compare any others because mallory is all i've used.
User avatar
KellyBass
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:27 pm
Location: Tulsa!

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by KellyBass »

That's cool that you think they sound good now!...cause after some break in, they REALLY start to sparkle. Are you using the "standard" ones, or the blues?
This message has been printed using 100% recycled electrons.
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by iknowjohnny »

Wow, thats nice to hear ! Yeah, the standards. How long till break in? With the way the amp sounds now, if it actually gets better i may not be able to handle it ! :D
User avatar
KellyBass
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:27 pm
Location: Tulsa!

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by KellyBass »

Seems like it was after about ten hours or so. And I'm thinkin' it had to be the sozo signal caps...I stuck them in an amp I've had for years, using the same tubes and speaker cab. The only mod was the sozo's. Even my road-worn ears picked up on the gradual change.
This message has been printed using 100% recycled electrons.
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by iknowjohnny »

only 6-7 hours to go. :D
User avatar
rsalinger
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:17 pm
Location: Aveiro, Portugal

Re: Best way to impliment a parallel stage

Post by rsalinger »

Hmm... I've learnt so much over the past few months, reading the back-posts. Lots of good information. Nice people, too...


I've got a schem for a tube clean boost circuit (V1a from Matchless Hot Box pedal)... it uses one half of a 12ax7wb.

What do I need to keep in mind, in order to change this into a parallel triode stage?

Thanks,
Rob
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Music is an expression of the inexpressable ~ Vernon Reid, Musician.
Post Reply