stevlech wrote:Not to stir up flames here, but something in the previous posts confuses me. If guys like Z openly admit that they tweaked an existing design, why are they protective of the circuitry? If one believes that it is ok to utilize a circuit that was invented some time ago and is in public domain, why would they take actions against those who wish to copy the circuit when in fact that is what they did themselves? Again, I don't mean to cause trouble, I just don't get it...
My $.02

HE is NOT overly protective
Only the power section is Hammond, The Dived B 13 I've seen were a gibson circuit, the Boogie Rectumfrier lead channel is an SLO100, the Peavey 5150 is an SLO100 with a twist.
If DRZ were overly protective he would goop his circuit like some other knuckleheads out there.
In fact I think his answer is to offer reasonable quality at a resonable price.
I think the Dumble mentality is all wrong, produce a good product for the correct profit and people wont be trying to rip you off. Start jacking up the price, gooping shit making totally unserviceable and you have a bag of junk IMO.
The only amps I have seen that were of exceptional build quality actually did nothing for me, like the Komet stuff, sorry I dont get it, $3800 is really pushing it for what is in there, but they sure are made nice even if them hum too much.
These guys talking about the ultimate RF amp, come on! Make a nice amp and sell it but nobody is going to sound like RF unless they can play like him and there are not too many guys out there like that, everytime I've seen him except one he wasnt using a Bumble. There is absoltely nothing new in tube overdrive design, it has ALL been done before, show me one circuit that is truly original, aint going to happen due to the nature of the operation of tubes. Kind of like someone talking about the VHT depth control, the exact values date back to my Radiotron designers handbook. One guy I do truly respect is Aiken, makes a great product an knows his shit, cool that he hangs out here as well. As long as the designs are not used for profit I dont think many of the builders have a problem with sharing but it really boils down to them staying reasonable with their prices, offer lifetime warantee, great customer service and making quality aamps as to their success. Dumble could have been much more successful financially if he had not been so paranoid and focus on better production
