Rocket preamp tubes

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

andrew
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: alabama

Rocket preamp tubes

Post by andrew »

What is your favorite preamp tube lineup on a Rocket?
andrew
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: alabama

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by andrew »

Has anyone tried the Groove Tube "Mullard" copy 12ax7?
User avatar
RJ Guitars
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 am
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico
Contact:

Best New Production preamp tube in a Rocket

Post by RJ Guitars »

I know this has been talked about a bunch but my management of the search engine didn't find as much as I expected. I know I am missing it somewhere.

Please indulge me while I fly this flag again and see what we know or maybe somebody will point me to the the previous discussions.

What do folks think is the best new production preamp tube for a Rocket? I have some private reserve of old stock for myself but nothing to suggest for those that missed the easy days of tube scrounging and hoarding. I have heard some good things about the reproduction Mullards, Any thoughts?

rj
Good, Fast, or Cheap -- Pick two...

http://www.rjguitars.net
http://www.rjaudioresearch.com/
http://diyguitaramps.prophpbb.com/
User avatar
KellyBass
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:27 pm
Location: Tulsa!

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by KellyBass »

I've found I really like current production tung-sol 12ax7's.

And by the way, RJ...the saratov's you sent me for my latest rocket sound FANTASTIC! Thanks!!
This message has been printed using 100% recycled electrons.
User avatar
RJ Guitars
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 am
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by RJ Guitars »

Thanks Kelly,

As near as I can tell those Saratov's are the same tubes that Dr. Z is using in his Z-Wreck builds. I know the price of them sorta jumped in the past year as folks are catching on to them.

Below is a link to a good overview of the current production 12AX7's.

rj

http://thetubestore.com/12ax7review.html
Good, Fast, or Cheap -- Pick two...

http://www.rjguitars.net
http://www.rjaudioresearch.com/
http://diyguitaramps.prophpbb.com/
paulster
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: Los Angeles & London

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by paulster »

KellyBass wrote:I've found I really like current production tung-sol 12ax7's.
You need to be really careful of using the new Tung-Sols in cathode follower positions though as they can't tolerate the high cathode-to-heater voltages that we expect CF tubes to, and are way more prone to failing in this position than probably any new production tube.

They are a great sounding tube though for new production, just ill-suited for V2.
Cliff Schecht
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:32 am
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by Cliff Schecht »

paulster wrote:
KellyBass wrote:I've found I really like current production tung-sol 12ax7's.
You need to be really careful of using the new Tung-Sols in cathode follower positions though as they can't tolerate the high cathode-to-heater voltages that we expect CF tubes to, and are way more prone to failing in this position than probably any new production tube.

They are a great sounding tube though for new production, just ill-suited for V2.
Is elevating the heaters to the power stage cathode enough to counteract this problem?
Cliff Schecht - Circuit P.I.
paulster
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: Los Angeles & London

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by paulster »

Cliff

The answer is I honestly don't know, as it's unclear (to me at least) what the maximum cathode-to-heater potential that these can reliably tolerate is.

Marshalls kill them in very short order, as do AC30s, which run at higher voltages across the preamp than the Rocket.

DC elevation to the power tube cathode voltage will reduce the potential but only by about 10V or so, so it's still debatable whether this and the lower preamp voltages is enough for long-term reliability or not.

It's a real shame about this element of the design because they're a really nice sounding tube as far as new production goes, but suffer this problem and also are prone to massive heater hum after a period (which I work around by using DC).
User avatar
KellyBass
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:27 pm
Location: Tulsa!

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by KellyBass »

That's very good info, Paulster. I had plans for just such an CF arrangement on a future build and I'm sure I would have just grabbed one of the tung sol's not knowing this. Thanks! and it is a shame...I really like them.
This message has been printed using 100% recycled electrons.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by Structo »

Yeah the guys over at the Metro forum were complaining the new Tung Sol's didn't last long in the CF stage at all.

I haven't tried them yet but I am liking the quad of Tung Sol STR (6L6) that I have in my D clone.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by M Fowler »

I have been using JJ and GT gold.
User avatar
RJ Guitars
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 am
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by RJ Guitars »

paulster wrote:
KellyBass wrote:I've found I really like current production tung-sol 12ax7's.
You need to be really careful of using the new Tung-Sols in cathode follower positions though as they can't tolerate the high cathode-to-heater voltages that we expect CF tubes to, and are way more prone to failing in this position than probably any new production tube.

They are a great sounding tube though for new production, just ill-suited for V2.
Thanks guys. Does anyone have a suggestion for V2 and can I assume that one of the new production Tungsols will work well at v3 as well as v1?

rj
Good, Fast, or Cheap -- Pick two...

http://www.rjguitars.net
http://www.rjaudioresearch.com/
http://diyguitaramps.prophpbb.com/
redshark
Posts: 822
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:42 pm
Location: Veracruz, Mexico

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by redshark »

Well, if you already decided to use new production tubes and have tungsol in V1 and V3 I would use either JJecc803 or a sovtek LP in V2.
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by jelle »

Yes, use a IRF840. :lol:

JJ tall plate works for me so far. Also shuguang 12AX7's work for many people.

I only read about bad experiences with CF's and the New Sensor, sovjet tubes. Unfortunately they make a lot of different brand tubes.
User avatar
RJ Guitars
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 am
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: Rocket preamp tubes

Post by RJ Guitars »

I would like to be identify a good set of new production 12AX7 tubes that will serve to start up and tweak a fresh build amp build without breaking the bank.

I was reading up on Electro Harmonix and Svetlana offerings and the reviews were good but then I also read that these tubes are from the New Sensor factory and basically the same tube as the new issue Tungsol... so that doesn't sound like a good choice for a V2 CF candidate.

Does anybody know much about the Reissue Mullards? The review on these was also good but I'd like to add some real world credibility to go along with that review.

Otherwise it seems like the nod goes to the Sovtek 12AX7-LPS or the JJ.

Any other thoughts?

rj
Good, Fast, or Cheap -- Pick two...

http://www.rjguitars.net
http://www.rjaudioresearch.com/
http://diyguitaramps.prophpbb.com/
Post Reply