Bassman AA864
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Bassman AA864
In the Bass Channel tone stack, at the 250pf cap - 220k resistor. Is that a high pass filter? If I were to remove the 220k, would more high frequency pass, controlled by the 250pf?
Or more simply put, what happens when that 220k is removed?
Thank You
http://www.el34world.com/charts/Schemat ... _AA864.pdf
Or more simply put, what happens when that 220k is removed?
Thank You
http://www.el34world.com/charts/Schemat ... _AA864.pdf
Re: Bassman AA864
That circuit approximates what you'd get with a normal treble setup turned down quite a bit. So yes, it's a treble attenuator. If you remove it, the treble pot may need to be replaced as it will probably seem quite ineffective. I have that amp, and the entire channel is set up to create a dark, boomy bass sound. You can plug an electric guitar into that channel and get a big, dark bassy tone. I plugged a P-Bass into that channel once, unplugged it and never tried it again. 
Also, the .001uF cap in parallel with the 220K on the third triode is a treble attenuator as well.
Hope this helps.
Also, the .001uF cap in parallel with the 220K on the third triode is a treble attenuator as well.
Hope this helps.
Re: Bassman AA864
That would be a very easy amp to mod into a killer clean/overdrive amp.
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
Re: Bassman AA864
I am in the process of building the amp right now and loaded about half of my board Saturday.
I am going to stick with the stock AA864 values. But man that layout is hard to read so it's a good thing I have a decent PDF of the schematic.
Oh and I am using 715 ODs.
I am going to stick with the stock AA864 values. But man that layout is hard to read so it's a good thing I have a decent PDF of the schematic.
Oh and I am using 715 ODs.
Re: Bassman AA864
BTF - Thanks for the info. If I remove that 220k , Would I be going over board with a 500k pot while retaining the 250pf cap. In you opinion of course, not looking for any guarantees from anybody...... I guess what I am trying to do, if possible, is to make the bass channel more guitar friendly without duplicating the normal channel or going too mod crazy.
Structo - I have another Bassman head also. That is the one I will be looking to mod a bit more. It is a real beater, and will never be sold; so no worries about what I do inside.
Hey Mr.F - I would be real interested in your opinion of the "Bass Channel" when used for guitar. Can you get back to us when you are finished with that build.....?
Thank You
Structo - I have another Bassman head also. That is the one I will be looking to mod a bit more. It is a real beater, and will never be sold; so no worries about what I do inside.
Hey Mr.F - I would be real interested in your opinion of the "Bass Channel" when used for guitar. Can you get back to us when you are finished with that build.....?
Thank You
Last edited by C Moore on Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Bassman AA864
I have had so many bassman amps in my life time and used them for guitar until I ran across my Tremolux.
Used that Tremolux exclusively, but sold that to Mike Keller and not sure if he ran that when played he with Double Trouble or not. I was suppose to get a 59 Bassman 410 in trade but his dad bowed out on the trade deal.
I'll get back to you on this though. This amp will sound better than an original or I will have to start over.
Used that Tremolux exclusively, but sold that to Mike Keller and not sure if he ran that when played he with Double Trouble or not. I was suppose to get a 59 Bassman 410 in trade but his dad bowed out on the trade deal.
I'll get back to you on this though. This amp will sound better than an original or I will have to start over.
Re: Bassman AA864
Over the years (and before I realized that the 864 was going to become such a Big Thing) I used my 864 for experiments. I put it back stock except that I did rework the Bass channel. I simply hate the sound of that channel.
Sure, you can replace the treble pot with a 500K. It will go a bit darker and brighter than the 250K option.
To tell you the truth, I cannot fathom WHY people go crazy for the 864 except for the fact that it was made for only a year or so. During my experiments, I wired it as a 6G6B (with my current bass channel) and I tell you it was God's Own Amp as far as I was concerned! It had a fantastic clean, and a crunch so creamy you were ten pounds heavier after you played it.
Sadly, I'm a nebbish and felt guilty after the 864 became so Holy. That's why I put it back. I still feel the 864 is a POOR second to the 6G6B. Its crunch is grittier and more one-dimensional than the 6G6B. But beauty is in the ear of the beholder, so what do I know?
Good Luck to All! Bill.
Sure, you can replace the treble pot with a 500K. It will go a bit darker and brighter than the 250K option.
To tell you the truth, I cannot fathom WHY people go crazy for the 864 except for the fact that it was made for only a year or so. During my experiments, I wired it as a 6G6B (with my current bass channel) and I tell you it was God's Own Amp as far as I was concerned! It had a fantastic clean, and a crunch so creamy you were ten pounds heavier after you played it.
Sadly, I'm a nebbish and felt guilty after the 864 became so Holy. That's why I put it back. I still feel the 864 is a POOR second to the 6G6B. Its crunch is grittier and more one-dimensional than the 6G6B. But beauty is in the ear of the beholder, so what do I know?
Good Luck to All! Bill.
Re: Bassman AA864
Yes I like the 6G6 tone stack wiring myself which is very similar to a Komet 60.
If you lower the 250pf that should help with mid range, keeping the 220k as is.
If you lower the 250pf that should help with mid range, keeping the 220k as is.
Re: Bassman AA864
I took a quick peek at the 6G6 (A or B). There is a huge difference on the bass channel I see. Cat follower to drive most of the tone stack, and the treble pot is handled differently. The 6G6 also uses both halves of that last triode before the PI. So I can read a schematic, but I do not have enough knowledge to know what it all adds up to? I guess the 6G6 would be a Blonde or Brown amp. Does a guitar sound any better through the Bass Channel of a 6G6 than it does through a Black Face circuit? My ears have no experience with a Blonde Bassman.
Thank You
Thank You
Last edited by C Moore on Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Bassman AA864
One thing I'll point out is that I was not using the Bass channel stock or modified to get my sound. When I redid the Bass channel, I completely reworked the channel first using a tonestack setup recommended by Ken Fischer, then I later used essentially the same setup but with a 59 Bassman tonestack driven from the plate. Ken's stack was very smooth, but a bit toppy. The Bassman stack was a wee bit more old school. My Bassman was wired so that I could use the Deep switch to internally activate both channels. I still use that as it's VERY neat and you don't need the patch cable.
Now that the amp is back to 864, it's a better power amp to use with pedals than a crunchmeister.
Regards!
Now that the amp is back to 864, it's a better power amp to use with pedals than a crunchmeister.
Regards!