Output tube observations

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

dogears
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:29 pm

Output tube observations

Post by dogears »

I spent many hours since getting my new Maxi-Matcher output tube tester comparing different sets of 6L6 tubes in my Bludo Ojai.

I came up with some important observations.

Brand is not as important in many cases as the plate current and transconductance measurements.

In other words, higher headroom tubes sound and feel better to me. I have several quads of SED Winged Cs. However, these all measure low. PC of 16-17 and TC of 2000-2100. The TC is under spec. 2200 or so is considered the low end. These tubes when installed do not sound as good as my stronger rated quads from TAD (short bottles), Tung Sol reissue shorts, Ruby 6l6GC MSTR, and even Sovtek!

I discovered that a nice tube that biases in at -48v to -50v sound good. TC in the 2400-2800 range is nice. Plate current on a Maxi of 20 to 28. Higher the better.

Currently for new stock, I am back to the Tung Sol short bottles. I have a quad installed measuring 25 on the plate current and 2600 on transconductance.

Be careful with SED. The tubes are coming super weak these days.

Any thoughts?
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Output tube observations

Post by M Fowler »

When ordering tubes then we need to go to a dealer that provides a rating system and based on your testing what should I ask for in those octal power tubes? The transconductance measurements?

I'm referring to new production tubes.

Mark
dogears
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:29 pm

Re: Output tube observations

Post by dogears »

Higher numbers on the GT scale or TAD scale.

For instance, TADs with a rating of 6 or 8.


M Fowler wrote:When ordering tubes then we need to go to a dealer that provides a rating system and based on your testing what should I ask for in those octal power tubes? The transconductance measurements?

I'm referring to new production tubes.

Mark
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Output tube observations

Post by M Fowler »

Thanks for the information that really helps me out.

ALso, GT has a totally different number system based on matching.
User avatar
FYL
Posts: 654
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:05 am

Re: Output tube observations

Post by FYL »

ALso, GT has a totally different number system based on matching.
Details here: http://www.guitaramplifierblueprinting.com/Rating.html
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Output tube observations

Post by Structo »

Thanks, good info there.

Sad to hear that the Winged C tubes are not keeping up the high quality that they had earlier on.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
Max
Posts: 1579
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 6:08 pm

Re: Output tube observations

Post by Max »

Seems to be a matter of personal taste, too:

My own personal taste is the same as the one of Scott (headroom). But I've met first class guitar players, who preferred tubes with lower transconductance values a lot and in the very same Dumble ODS.

Cheers,

Max
dogears
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:29 pm

Re: Output tube observations

Post by dogears »

Max,

Keep in mind I was referring to the 10% underspec Winged C tubes! When they get that low, I don't think those same guys would prefer them.

There is a kind of point you reach where the weak tubes just are not so good.
Max wrote:Seems to be a matter of personal taste, too:

My own personal taste is the same as the one of Scott (headroom). But I've met first class guitar players, who preferred tubes with lower transconductance values a lot and in the very same Dumble ODS.

Cheers,

Max
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Output tube observations

Post by M Fowler »

Good information guys thanks.

Mark
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Output tube observations

Post by Structo »

Scott what is it you hear when comparing say, some weak Winged C tubes compared to a quad that tests strong?
In other words what does a quad of weak tubes sound like?

I don't have enough experience to know what to listen for other than if the amp just wasn't very loud anymore.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Output tube observations

Post by M Fowler »

The EL34s I got from one supplier were called seconds poor rating and they had less headroom and more stale sounding without any blum.
tubedogsmith
Posts: 597
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:52 pm

Re: Output tube observations

Post by tubedogsmith »

Structo wrote:Scott what is it you hear when comparing say, some weak Winged C tubes compared to a quad that tests strong?
In other words what does a quad of weak tubes sound like?

I don't have enough experience to know what to listen for other than if the amp just wasn't very loud anymore.

Not Scott, but they're weaker, softer sounding, squishier and can be a bit ratty and gritty sounding even. That description is in comparison to a strong tube and not as bad as it sounds from my description.
User avatar
FYL
Posts: 654
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:05 am

Re: Output tube observations

Post by FYL »

Sad to hear that the Winged C tubes are not keeping up the high quality that they had earlier on.
They are still excellent, but it seems that numerous factory rejects have found their way to distributors worldwide...
dogears
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:29 pm

Re: Output tube observations

Post by dogears »

Where are you finding the strong ones??
FYL wrote:
Sad to hear that the Winged C tubes are not keeping up the high quality that they had earlier on.
They are still excellent, but it seems that numerous factory rejects have found their way to distributors worldwide...
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: Output tube observations

Post by talbany »

For some reason and not sure at the time about the matching system but my JCM 800 always sounded the best using GT 6CA7's #7 Used them for like 5 years stayed pretty consistent sounding and feeling and I always re-biased the fresh set..The JJ-34's in that amp sounded and felt rather bad!!

Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
Post Reply