hired hand wrote:..... explaining chokes in the power supply. Some amps do and some don't. Why just one, and why is it always in that position ?
Most production amps use a resistor in the filter because it is cheaper, and/or a resistor drops more voltage in the power rail, and in the case of some amps they want this voltage drop to set the screens up to 50-60V below the plate voltage (which you could also do with a choke and a separate screen supply resistor, but less parts is less money and resistors are cheaper than chokes).
You wanna use more chokes? Be my guest. But its kinda like a waste of money if you use more than one, because they do such a good job of filtering the power supply, that you really only need one (along with a few decoupling filter caps and dropper resistors to get the power rail voltage progressively lower and smooth going further towards the start of the signal path in the pre-amp).
As to the position in the supply rail, well the screen voltage ideally needs to be smooth to provide the constant current in the output tubes.
In a PP amp the opposite sides of the primary provides a hum-cancelling/inductor function, for the output tubes, so the choke ideally needs to go between the plate/OT supply point and the rest of the amp supply.
Whereas in a SE amp, there is no hum-cancelling property in the OT, so chokes are only useful in that case if they are filtering the whole amp (i.e. including the B+ for the plates), which means you need a bigger choke (than you otherwise would if you were only filtering the pre-amp and screens) because it is doing more inducting (bigger AC swings- more current).
In early Fender tweed amps, (Super. Pro, Bandmaster etc) there are big chokes filtering the whole amp, but his concept was later dropped by Fender as cost-cutting mentality took hold. Still there's nothing wrong with using a choke to filter the whole amp if you want to put in a big enough one to do the job.