It's like, I could tell you the answer to your question but I'll just refer to my book so you will buy it.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

For your Dumble-clone you need SUS-1 since it's fixed bias.cdc3jj wrote:I had never heard of london power. Just spent half the afternoon trolling around their site. Pretty cool... Which of the sus kits would I need for the ceriatone?
From their site:
SUS-1 can be used with any non-Power Scaled fixed-biased amplifier.
SUS-2 can be used with any cathode-biased amplifier, regardless of whether the amp is Power Scaled.
SUS-3 is for fixed-biased amplifiers fitted with Power Scaling.
I'm thinking sus-2. Are these pretty easy to install? I'm sure they have a layout, I'm just not clear on where I would put it in the amp. Thanks for the link. Wheels are turning steady now.
I understand your frustration, but I think Kevin intends his forum to be mainly a support site for his kits and books. I'd rather see a more open discussion there too, but there are other great forums for that (here for instance...).Structo wrote:When I have visited the London Power site before, I got tired real quick of it because O'Connor refers to his books in just about every thread of the forum and in his FAQ's.
It's like, I could tell you the answer to your question but I'll just refer to my book so you will buy it.
+1d95err wrote:I understand your frustration, but I think Kevin intends his forum to be mainly a support site for his kits and books. I'd rather see a more open discussion there too, but there are other great forums for that (here for instance...).Structo wrote:When I have visited the London Power site before, I got tired real quick of it because O'Connor refers to his books in just about every thread of the forum and in his FAQ's.
It's like, I could tell you the answer to your question but I'll just refer to my book so you will buy it.
 
 Since the thread has already mentioned London Power, you might want to check out Kevin O'Connor's Super-Scaler which is mentioned in Volume 4 The Utimate Tone (along with Sustain/Sag, what it is and how to this option to an amp) or Volume 5 (actually amps with schematics and circuits). A Super Scaler is a class B Amp which is driven by a lower power amp (a 5B6 for example) and makes it louder without changing the tone.M Fowler wrote:
Take that Fender 5B6 PTP amp I built with octal pre that sucker sounds fantastic right out of the chute with low volume sustain. But the trade off is your not going to bring the house down unless its miked and your only style of music for the night is playing blues. Which isn't all that bad to me.
What the hell exactly is sag (rectifer) sag (transformer)? Resistor based sag such as in some 18w Marshall type builds?
 
 Not true at all. The definition of class of operation has not changed, so what you are doing is perpetuating a myth.renshen1957 wrote:
The AC 30 is Class A up to 22 1/2 watts when it slips over into class AB. )
This is certainly true for the Dumble Chapter which I read two weeks ago. I did not learn a thing, actually I was more confused after reading it.dartanion wrote:
As far as KOC is concerned, You'll learn more by reading an old tube manual or RDH4.

You guys are perhaps not the target group of the DUmble chapter in TUT6. My guess would be that many people on this site have more knowledge on Dumble amps than KOC.jelle wrote:This is certainly true for the Dumble Chapter which I read two weeks ago. I did not learn a thing, actually I was more confused after reading it.dartanion wrote:
As far as KOC is concerned, You'll learn more by reading an old tube manual or RDH4.
I really dig RDH4.
I just asked a question over there and got a reference to his latest $72 book. In my case, I can buy a custom PT for about $110 and take care of the issue directly.Structo wrote:When I have visited the London Power site before, I got tired real quick of it because O'Connor refers to his books in just about every thread of the forum and in his FAQ's.
It really depends on what you're looking for in your amp collection. The Dumble isn't meant to be a saggy amp. This is why you'll find so many who prefer the 100W amps over his 50W and 6V6 amps. That said, the standard chassis for a 50W should have room for a rectifier tube in line with the output tubes. If the pt has an unused 5V tap, you don't need a different one. Using a tube rectifier brings B+ down because they're that way...~20V for a good GZ-34, more like 40V or 50V for the 5U4G.cdc3jj wrote:This might be a ittle off topic, but what would happen if I changed the PT? To something lighter like a 25 or 30w.
I must add that I like his books in general. Since the comment was made that there is a Dumble chapter, I felt obliged to warn our fellow TAG members from buying it for this reason. I occasionally buy one of his books and generally I enjoy reading each chapter. As for the OT's topic...bluesfendermanblues wrote:You guys are perhaps not the target group of the DUmble chapter in TUT6. My guess would be that many people on this site have more knowledge on Dumble amps than KOC.jelle wrote:This is certainly true for the Dumble Chapter which I read two weeks ago. I did not learn a thing, actually I was more confused after reading it.dartanion wrote:
As far as KOC is concerned, You'll learn more by reading an old tube manual or RDH4.
I really dig RDH4.
Let it go. Kevin is trying to make an honest buck selling book. I respect that. - Lets talk amp sag instead.
 Do not forget to keep the B+ low. Soft vaccuum tubes will feel very different in these amps.
 Do not forget to keep the B+ low. Soft vaccuum tubes will feel very different in these amps.I think you're getting two different topics mixed up here. One is the old Class A hype discussion. I agree that for an amp to be called a Class A amp, it should be operating in class A at maximum rated output power.dartanion wrote:Class A is achieved by output tube plate current flowing for 360 degrees of the input cycle at maximum unclipped output. Thus, class of operation does not change when you crank up the volume. As well, the AC30 is well known to be operating in class AB.
I understand that when you are varying the input level, yes, theoretically the amp is operating in a different class if you throw out the definition of class of operation, but you are totally missing the point. You are trying to re-define class of operation by saying, "But all class AB amps are operating in class A att some signal level below maximum output." Class of operation is determined at maximum unclipped output. What about that is not clear? If the output device is not conducting current throughout the input cycle, it's not class A. AC30s do not conduct current throughout the input cycle, and are thus not class A. They are class AB. If you don't trust me, maybe you should read Mr. Aiken's white paper on the subject. As well, Randall is a great guy and I'm sure would be willing to explain it to you here. Regardless, here's the link: http://aikenamps.com/VoxAC30classA_2.htmld95err wrote:I think you're getting two different topics mixed up here. One is the old Class A hype discussion. I agree that for an amp to be called a Class A amp, it should be operating in class A at maximum rated output power.dartanion wrote:Class A is achieved by output tube plate current flowing for 360 degrees of the input cycle at maximum unclipped output. Thus, class of operation does not change when you crank up the volume. As well, the AC30 is well known to be operating in class AB.
But all class AB amps are operating in class A att some signal level below maximum output (otherwise it would be a class B amp). The point where the transistion between class A and class AB operation happens is a key issue when discussing sag.