A 70's ODS

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by Zippy »

Max wrote:As far as I remember now, he once told in regard of the ODS, that Lindley asked him to built an amp that had the "mean" tone of a Tweed Deluxe on full throttle but with more control and stability.

And if you listen to one of these first OD prototypes and the first generation ODS (smaller, strave switch etc.), I think you can indeed hear a likeness to a Tweed Deluxe driven hard. And these very early 50 Watt amps into a Dumble 2x12 JBL, Altec or EV cabinet really blow a 50W and even an early seventies 100W Marshall stack out of every window if they are set up right.

A wonderful year 2010 to all here

Max
If the overdriven Tweed sound was/is the target, maybe RedPlate Amps are the way to go for authentic sound. 8)

Where's that TweedyVerb...?
User avatar
heisthl
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:35 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by heisthl »

Zippy wrote: If the overdriven Tweed sound was/is the target, maybe RedPlate Amps are the way to go for authentic sound. 8)

Where's that TweedyVerb...?
Careful - now you're poking around with the tone in my head 8) Although to be fair it was Carlton, Gibbons and (later)Ford that put it in there.
Former owner of Music Mechanix
www.RedPlateAmps.com
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by talbany »

Max
Looks like we're back at it again...
Personally I don't really pay to much attention to what Howie say's around a reporter or anywhere near a camera.. After the Marshmallows on the Football field and Crystal lattice comments.. I also remember him stating how he approaches phase inversion totally different than other designers (Do we really need to go there).. If you look at the 2 topology of Tweed and ODS Early ones there really aren't too many similarities or enough for me to believe that he designed the ODS to sound like an overgrown Tweed Deluxe..I do think there are some similarities in tone.. though I think most of them are purely coincidence..Or maybe he leaned in that direction in how he tweaked the final voice..Only he knows!!
I think he say's stuff like that so people will go yeah that would be kinda cool an overgrown whatever.. How many have tried the overgrown Deluxe Reverb stigma... Yeah we do this and that 4 6v's and it's a Deluxe on steroids... Not!!!!...I think allot of this is purely marketing BS...Looking at it from a designers standpoint I think the ODS came about through modding Blackface and other 2 channel Fenders.. Experimenting around with feeding one channel into another for more gain through a primitive switching system... Over the years tweaking then for different players sort of stumbled on a sound he liked ..( If you think about it you have to have some sort of sound in your head to solidify your design)... This is how I see it from a designers stand point.. It was revolutionary for the time and was one of the first to cascade gain stages so you gotta give him credit... Like I said just my opinion..

Tony VVT
Max
Posts: 1579
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 6:08 pm

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by Max »

talbany wrote:Max
Looks like we're back at it again...
Personally I don't really pay to much attention to what Howie say's around a reporter or anywhere near a camera.. After the Marshmallows on the Football field and Crystal lattice comments.. I also remember him stating how he approaches phase inversion totally different than other designers (Do we really need to go there).. If you look at the 2 topology of Tweed and ODS Early ones there really aren't too many similarities or enough for me to believe that he designed the ODS to sound like an overgrown Tweed Deluxe..I do think there are some similarities in tone.. though I think most of them are purely coincidence..Or maybe he leaned in that direction in how he tweaked the final voice..Only he knows!!
I think he say's stuff like that so people will go yeah that would be kinda cool an overgrown whatever.. How many have tried the overgrown Deluxe Reverb stigma... Yeah we do this and that 4 6v's and it's a Deluxe on steroids... Not!!!!...I think allot of this is purely marketing BS...Looking at it from a designers standpoint I think the ODS came about through modding Blackface and other 2 channel Fenders.. Experimenting around with feeding one channel into another for more gain through a primitive switching system... Over the years tweaking then for different players sort of stumbled on a sound he liked ..( If you think about it you have to have some sort of sound in your head to solidify your design)... This is how I see it from a designers stand point.. It was revolutionary for the time and was one of the first to cascade gain stages so you gotta give him credit... Like I said just my opinion..

Tony VVT
I think it is rather usual that two different persons start with similar infos but end up with different conclusions:

For me his kind of "metaphoric" talk makes sense. If you ever had learned to sing in the way a tenor does e. g., you would know, how important it is in regard to different sounds to have some kind of "image" in your head to focus on. If you learn Aikido or Iaido or other bu-do arts these kind of images are sometimes helpful too. I think, I understand to some extent what he is talking about in this "marshmallow image"

As far as I remember, he indeed approaches "phase inversion" different in Winterlands, Dumblelands and SSSs then m o s t designers of musical instrument amplifiers did in the seventies and early eighties. The Dumbleland is no Sunn 2000S and the Dumbleland 300SL is no SVT and the ODS 150W is a different beast again etc..

If people here talk about "early" or "silverface" ODS they constantly mix up design features of amps from f o u r different generations of ODS with (for my ears) very different tones. First generation amps have many similarities in tone with tweed dlx amps. Second generation ODS are far more "midrangy" (for my ears) then first generation and less similar in harmonic structure to tweed dlx (for my ears).

From my own experience with his amps and cabinets there are only very few infos in the interviews, that I did not find in the sounds or designs of his amps.

And I don't think he is a "marketing" guy, as he seems not to be very stupid but makes everything "wrong" from a "marketing" point of view.

As far as I know the only "profit" of his "marketing strategy" up to now has been made by some lucky "collectors" and some of his customers who just did not do as - at least many of them - had signed to, when they ordered their amps and by some amp builders like TR who could built up a business on the fact, that he decided to go another road then Randy Smith. If he had been a "marketing guy" there would be thousands and thousands of original Dumble ODS and SSS etc. on the market and no musician or collector would be crazy enough to pay somewhere between 50 and 100 thousand bucks for a Dumble amp or 7.500 for a "Custom Signature Reverb".

No, indeed, for me, as one who has other sources too, it all makes sense what he tells in the interviews.

But I fully understand why you think different and respect your point of view.

Have a great new year for yourself, your families and friends and your business of course.

Max
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by Structo »

When I heard some of those comments made by HAD I think it had to do a lot with the era at the time he made them.
Kind of like late 60's early 70's type talk.

Like, wow man, that is so heavy. Or the groovy talk of the flower children down at Haight Ashbury.
It's like a crystal lattice and a vacuum man.... :lol:

I think he wanted to sound mystical and hip in regards to his amps.

Believe me, my older sister was a flower child with the painted flowers on her cheeks and love beads galore, so I certainly heard my share of the groovy talk back then.

But he sure is a man surrounded by mystery as there isn't that much public information about him published.
I know there is the "Dumble Book" but besides that, not really much in print or on video of or about the man.

So when there is such a lack of information about somebody, things get exaggerated and spun into some real inaccurate conclusions.

Whether he really had the "Tone" in his head or had a few happy accidents on the bread boards, who knows, but I sure like my amp and I for one am glad HAD did what he did when he did it. :D
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by talbany »

Max wrote:
talbany wrote:Max
Looks like we're back at it again...
Personally I don't really pay to much attention to what Howie say's around a reporter or anywhere near a camera.. After the Marshmallows on the Football field and Crystal lattice comments.. I also remember him stating how he approaches phase inversion totally different than other designers (Do we really need to go there).. If you look at the 2 topology of Tweed and ODS Early ones there really aren't too many similarities or enough for me to believe that he designed the ODS to sound like an overgrown Tweed Deluxe..I do think there are some similarities in tone.. though I think most of them are purely coincidence..Or maybe he leaned in that direction in how he tweaked the final voice..Only he knows!!
I think he say's stuff like that so people will go yeah that would be kinda cool an overgrown whatever.. How many have tried the overgrown Deluxe Reverb stigma... Yeah we do this and that 4 6v's and it's a Deluxe on steroids... Not!!!!...I think allot of this is purely marketing BS...Looking at it from a designers standpoint I think the ODS came about through modding Blackface and other 2 channel Fenders.. Experimenting around with feeding one channel into another for more gain through a primitive switching system... Over the years tweaking then for different players sort of stumbled on a sound he liked ..( If you think about it you have to have some sort of sound in your head to solidify your design)... This is how I see it from a designers stand point.. It was revolutionary for the time and was one of the first to cascade gain stages so you gotta give him credit... Like I said just my opinion..

Tony VVT
I think it is rather usual that two different persons start with similar infos but end up with different conclusions:

For me his kind of "metaphoric" talk makes sense. If you ever had learned to sing in the way a tenor does e. g., you would know, how important it is in regard to different sounds to have some kind of "image" in your head to focus on. If you learn Aikido or Iaido or other bu-do arts these kind of images are sometimes helpful too. I think, I understand to some extent what he is talking about in this "marshmallow image"

As far as I remember, he indeed approaches "phase inversion" different in Winterlands, Dumblelands and SSSs then m o s t designers of musical instrument amplifiers did in the seventies and early eighties. The Dumbleland is no Sunn 2000S and the Dumbleland 300SL is no SVT and the ODS 150W is a different beast again etc..

If people here talk about "early" or "silverface" ODS they constantly mix up design features of amps from f o u r different generations of ODS with (for my ears) very different tones. First generation amps have many similarities in tone with tweed dlx amps. Second generation ODS are far more "midrangy" (for my ears) then first generation and less similar in harmonic structure to tweed dlx (for my ears).

From my own experience with his amps and cabinets there are only very few infos in the interviews, that I did not find in the sounds or designs of his amps.

And I don't think he is a "marketing" guy, as he seems not to be very stupid but makes everything "wrong" from a "marketing" point of view.

As far as I know the only "profit" of his "marketing strategy" up to now has been made by some lucky "collectors" and some of his customers who just did not do as - at least many of them - had signed to, when they ordered their amps and by some amp builders like TR who could built up a business on the fact, that he decided to go another road then Randy Smith. If he had been a "marketing guy" there would be thousands and thousands of original Dumble ODS and SSS etc. on the market and no musician or collector would be crazy enough to pay somewhere between 50 and 100 thousand bucks for a Dumble amp or 7.500 for a "Custom Signature Reverb".

No, indeed, for me, as one who has other sources too, it all makes sense what he tells in the interviews.

But I fully understand why you think different and respect your point of view.

Have a great new year for yourself, your families and friends and your business of course.

Max
Max
Once again always love to hear your side..You always come at it from such a refreshing side..We need to sit down with a Beer at some point.. All the marketing designing stuff aside.. I think we both agree he built wonderful amps and took great pride in them..You know the things that count.. Have a good new years...

Tony
Max
Posts: 1579
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 6:08 pm

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by Max »

talbany wrote:We need to sit down with a Beer at some point..

Tony
Tony, Great idea! Need some straplocks anyway:

http://musformation.com/2009/03/the-gro ... -lock.html

Cheers

Max
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by jelle »

And great Dutch beer too! :D
Max
Posts: 1579
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 6:08 pm

Re: A 70's ODS

Post by Max »

jelle wrote:And great Dutch beer too! :D
Three is company!

Great weekend.

Max
Post Reply