AB763/BLJr mash-up

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
lonote
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2024 3:12 pm

AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by lonote »

Just finishing up an amp for a friend with a AB763 TMB pre, an AB763 2-tube reverb (+dwell), coupled to an LTPI EL84 PP output w/a LARMAR MV. He wasn't interested in having trem, which I likely would have added if it were mine.

Feeding the EL84s was initially fussier than I expected, but there was a lot of useful information in this linked TAG thread https://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=37166 that I implemented in the final design, so I thought I would share the final project, as opposed to adding it to the existing thread.

Bringing down the signal going into the PI was the key & I used the marked-up drawing for the pre-PI voltage divider that Martin Manning had provided in the linked thread, as well as some of Sluckey's ideas for the bias circuit & heater elevation (gathered at TAG & Hoffman), as well as a few VOX component values around the output tubes.

So far it has passed the smoke test, sounds nice, owner was happy after a test run on the bench, but it has yet to be gigged.


I just finished mapping out the circuit(s) & drawing the "AS-BUILT" schematic, hopefully with no errors.



Edit: corrected drawing
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by lonote on Thu Oct 24, 2024 11:52 am, edited 2 times in total.
cdemike
Posts: 337
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2023 5:27 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by cdemike »

Really cool build! What kind of voltages are you getting at node "D"? I'm underway with a build with a similar power supply, and I was considering direct-coupling my phase inverter since the 100K and 47k resistors form a divider for B+ in addition to the signal.
lonote
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2024 3:12 pm

Re: AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by lonote »

I didn't actually check the wall voltage when I measured, but it tends to run right at 120V where I am.


Nodes were reading:

A- 369V
B- 350V
C- 323V
D- 304V

That put all the D-node tubes about 203V-206V at the plates (w/100K plate resistors)

I am pretty happy with SS rectification & have been using that for the last few builds.

This was a first for me using for elevated heaters. Not a complicated thing, plus I really like that the voltage divider across the B+ lines drains down the filter caps as soon as it is powered off. A nice bonus.
stratomaster
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by stratomaster »

Do you have a coupling cap after the 3rd gain stage? As it is right now there's basically 147k to ground from that node.

Also I'd recommend going the other way with the reverb driver cathode resistor since it's got a MV. Try 1.5k to start.
lonote
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2024 3:12 pm

Re: AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by lonote »

stratomaster wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 1:08 am Do you have a coupling cap after the 3rd gain stage? As it is right now there's basically 147k to ground from that node.

Also I'd recommend going the other way with the reverb driver cathode resistor since it's got a MV. Try 1.5k to start.
There is indeed a coupling cap between those resistors & the plate, thanks for pointing that out. I expected a drawing error was in there somewhere. Revised the attached drawing above.

Thoughts behind the driver cathode value?
stratomaster
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by stratomaster »

Essentially even the typical 2.2k biased the tube cold enough in that application to run out of headroom in the AB763 style amps. The fact that the amp itself gets dirty around the same point as when this happens masks that issue. If you add a master volume control however the issue becomes more prominent. The AB763 also runs that tube 80-100v higher than you currently are, so you've reduced voltage AND biased the tube colder. There is likely not much headroom in your driver at all. Your saving grace, however, is the Dwell control which is likely never full up.

With your reduced voltage, a cathode resistor of 1.5k is a decent place to be to at least retain some headroom under higher Dwell and preamp volumes with low master volume settings. You may find 1.2k is even better. As always, take voltage measurements, calculate current and make sure to avoid overdissipation. But I think you'll be fine down to about 820ohms at your voltages.
sluckey
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by sluckey »

Some of the later Fender amps even had a 470Ω cathode resistor.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Roe
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by Roe »

sluckey wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 4:34 pm Some of the later Fender amps even had a 470Ω cathode resistor.
some also used 680R
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
lonote
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2024 3:12 pm

Re: AB763/BLJr mash-up

Post by lonote »

Thanks all for the insights. I have the amp here, as I am still working on the cabinet.

I will revisit that section & try out some alternate values.
Post Reply