Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- David Root
- Posts: 3540
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
- Location: Chilliwack BC
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
Yeah, I got confused. That .47uF cap is on the CF cathode, not the recovery cathode.
The difference between the 4.7uF recovery cathode and a 47uF there is roughly 22Hz to 2Hz I think. Does that make an audible difference? I guess Normster thought not.
The difference between the 4.7uF recovery cathode and a 47uF there is roughly 22Hz to 2Hz I think. Does that make an audible difference? I guess Normster thought not.
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
The difference at 30Hz is ~3dB. My only other thought is that some effects might create some content down there.David Root wrote:The difference between the 4.7uF recovery cathode and a 47uF there is roughly 22Hz to 2Hz I think. Does that make an audible difference? I guess Normster thought not.
-
Joost
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:11 pm
- Location: The Netherlands or Holland. Whichever you prefer
- Contact:
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
Ok, here is the new layout and schematic based on all the feedback. Please let me know what you think!
The thing that I keep wondering about this layout is that all these parts are around the tube and the heater wires. Will this not create more noise than my original layout?
HERE IS THE NEW PROJECTION:
[img
2073]http://www.familieassink.com/documents/ ... ionALT.jpg[/img]
HERE'S THE NEW LAYOUT:
[img
2883]http://www.familieassink.com/documents/ ... ostALT.jpg[/img]
LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR RESPONSES AND FEEDBACK
HERE'S THE NEW SCHEMATIC:
[img:439:543]http://www.familieassink.com/documents/ ... ostALT.gif[/img]
The thing that I keep wondering about this layout is that all these parts are around the tube and the heater wires. Will this not create more noise than my original layout?
HERE IS THE NEW PROJECTION:
[img
HERE'S THE NEW LAYOUT:
[img
LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR RESPONSES AND FEEDBACK
HERE'S THE NEW SCHEMATIC:
[img:439:543]http://www.familieassink.com/documents/ ... ostALT.gif[/img]
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
There should be no noise as long as you keep the components low and the leads short.
I would still try to eliminate that circuit board with the additional parts on it.
I would still try to eliminate that circuit board with the additional parts on it.
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
-
Joost
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:11 pm
- Location: The Netherlands or Holland. Whichever you prefer
- Contact:
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
Thanks for the reply. There really is no room for more. I need that circuit board. If I use coax for the lead to the grid on the send side and for the lead from return pot to phase inverter, I should be fine right?Structo wrote:There should be no noise as long as you keep the components low and the leads short.
I would still try to eliminate that circuit board with the additional parts on it.
BTW, CAN ANYONE MARK WHERE I SHOULD PUT THE OUTER FOIL SIDES OF THE CAPS?
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
Well for instance, the 1K8/ 47uF cathode bypass could go on pin 8.
Then ground the other end of it to the terminal strip lug that goes to ground.
The .047uF cap can go from pin 2 to the terminal strip then a wire from that to the Master volume.
Attached is the foil direction of the caps.
You will have to translate from the original build.
Then ground the other end of it to the terminal strip lug that goes to ground.
The .047uF cap can go from pin 2 to the terminal strip then a wire from that to the Master volume.
Attached is the foil direction of the caps.
You will have to translate from the original build.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
-
Joost
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:11 pm
- Location: The Netherlands or Holland. Whichever you prefer
- Contact:
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
Thanks for that. Does moving the 1k8/47uF reduce the chances of noise? Because I am really fine with the idea of the extra board. It's not in the way or on top of anything. Plus, even though I might be able to move over some more parts, no way am I getting all of them off the board. Reduced noise would be the only reason to move anything off the board.Structo wrote:Well for instance, the 1K8/ 47uF cathode bypass could go on pin 8.
Then ground the other end of it to the terminal strip lug that goes to ground.
The .047uF cap can go from pin 2 to the terminal strip then a wire from that to the Master volume.
Attached is the foil direction of the caps.
You will have to translate from the original build.
-
Joost
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:11 pm
- Location: The Netherlands or Holland. Whichever you prefer
- Contact:
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
Thanks again for all your help Structo. I checked that image to the dumbleator layout in the Dumble Files and came up with this:
btw, I noticed in that layout that every wire that is not B+ wire is coaxial. Should I do the same?
[img
2162]http://www.familieassink.com/documents/ ... LTFOIL.jpg[/img]
btw, I noticed in that layout that every wire that is not B+ wire is coaxial. Should I do the same?
[img
[/img]Structo wrote:Well for instance, the 1K8/ 47uF cathode bypass could go on pin 8.
Then ground the other end of it to the terminal strip lug that goes to ground.
The .047uF cap can go from pin 2 to the terminal strip then a wire from that to the Master volume.
Attached is the foil direction of the caps.
You will have to translate from the original build.
-
Joost
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:11 pm
- Location: The Netherlands or Holland. Whichever you prefer
- Contact:
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
btw, I want to go for maximum transparancy and lowest noise, so I was thinking of using all metal film and Xicon MPP caps. What do you think?
- David Root
- Posts: 3540
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
- Location: Chilliwack BC
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
PRP (Precision Resistive Products) metal films are very quiet. PR9372 type are audio grade. I have used them since for several years. They have higher voltage ratings than most. www.prp.com . May be hard to get in Europe, they are made in USA, but www.partsconnexion.com in Canada has them and they ship anywhere.
Xicon MPPs. I'm not a big fan of Xicon anything but I think Mark Foster likes them. Mark?
Xicon MPPs. I'm not a big fan of Xicon anything but I think Mark Foster likes them. Mark?
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
What's your experience with the Xicon stuff? I havent noticed anything bad as of yet. My D'lator has all MF resistors; some Xicon and some KOA Speer, and of course a Dale RN-65 for the recover stage plate load. I had to look for a quiet tube to keep the noise down, and IMO that is far more significant than anything the resistors are contributing.David Root wrote:I'm not a big fan of Xicon anything but I think Mark Foster likes them. Mark?
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
I'm going to go the other direction here; the Dumblelator by nature isn't really transparent and in many cases is used as a sort of tone control. Before I built one I thought that a built in unit would be such a great idea. However, my experience has been that it's not necessarily the same results with all circuits/amps. Therefore, I prefer to keep them separate.Joost wrote:btw, I want to go for maximum transparancy and lowest noise, so I was thinking of using all metal film and Xicon MPP caps. What do you think?
Has anyone else drawn the same conclusion?
I will say this, my #183 is a different amp using the Lator and the RG400 cables.
TM
-
Joost
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:11 pm
- Location: The Netherlands or Holland. Whichever you prefer
- Contact:
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
Here are some pics of the board inside my Too Rock as well as a close up of the tube used for the dumbleator with all the parts around it on terminal strips.
[img
667]http://www.familieassink.com/documents/toorock8.jpg[/img]
[img
667]http://www.familieassink.com/documents/toorock9.jpg[/img]
[img
667]http://www.familieassink.com/documents/toorock10.jpg[/img]
[img
[img
[img
-
Joost
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:11 pm
- Location: The Netherlands or Holland. Whichever you prefer
- Contact:
Re: Dumbleator for #124. Made a layout and schematic. Please C&a
BTW, I also moved the 1k8/47uF cathode resistor and bypass cap to terminal strips around the tube as per Structo's suggestion, so I used the space that got freed up on the board for the glaswerks mod for the preamp boost