At any rate, fourbangers sound cooler to me than twobangers. Period. Except for screaming lead sounds....
Have fun!
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
You could be but I tend to agree with your argument. I was making much the same case with RJ earlier today.jelle wrote:I think the complexity comes from the fact that in real life, these four powertubes are not 100% matched in terms of slope and response to input signal. When an input signal hits these four slightly different powertubes, they'll all respond a bit different, these outputs get summed, resulting in 'complexity'. Of course I could be full of crap here...
... and supertwin motorcycles. Ever heard a factory works Ducati running wide open? I've been riding Beemers since '78.jelle wrote:At any rate, fourbangers sound cooler to me than twobangers. Period. Except for screaming lead sounds...
That's a good approximation but I'm sure someone would raise the issue of the difference in the fundamental character of the 6V6 vs 6L6 (or EL84 quad vs EL34 pair). RJ was recalling that Norm did a 6V6 quad - what happened to him? I haven't seen him here in a while.Mark wrote:So I suppose the question to be asked is an amp with two 6L6's (4K primary on output transformer) less girthy/pleasant sounding than an amp with four 6V6's throught the same output transformer?