UltraPhonix with a few twists

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
fred.violleau
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by fred.violleau »

norburybrook wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2019 3:06 pm
fred.violleau wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2019 3:01 pm
My question is : do the resistor need to be balanced on both sides as they are also acting as a voltage divider right?

Fred.
if the resistors are the same value then you get a 50% drop in gain with a voltage divider I seem to remember.

M
Indeed Marcus!
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by talbany »

I though about using another relay in order to ground the signal of the channel that is not being used instead of using mixer resistors.
It would be synchronized with the input relay.
I know @Sluckey is using a switch on his dual marshall amp to ground the unused signal but only after the first stage of amplification.
Would this avenue allow me to tweek the two channels output independently?
It's hard to say? I've found it's generally a good idea to isolate them there to help any bleed-back as well as the added loading.
It would be easy to do! you can run it off the same relay switching supply as the input. A simple test would be to just ground it out for now with an alligator clip before the mixers and see if that helps first. As far as the difference in gain the tweed style tone control doesn't have the losses as the TMB/Bluesmaster does. You can also try a 12AY7 on the tweed spot? cut some gain there and see if that helps? just an idea.
BTW. Sending your signal through a rather large resistor (470k)before the D-Lator will dull your tone :evil:

Good Luck

Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by martin manning »

Fred, do you have an updated schematic for this amp? Skimming through the thread I don't see one that shows the Tweed section and the mixing.
fred.violleau
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by fred.violleau »

talbany wrote: Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:14 pm I've found it's generally a good idea to isolate them there to help any bleed-back as well as the added loading.
It would be easy to do! you can run it off the same relay switching supply as the input. A simple test would be to just ground it out for now with an alligator clip before the mixers and see if that helps first. As far as the difference in gain the tweed style tone control doesn't have the losses as the TMB/Bluesmaster does. You can also try a 12AY7 on the tweed spot? cut some gain there and see if that helps? just an idea.
BTW. Sending your signal through a rather large resistor (470k)before the D-Lator will dull your tone :evil:

Good Luck

Tony
Thanks Tony, I had not thought about using a tube with less mu. I might have one at hand, and if not, I need to order a new set of preamp tubes, so I will get one as well!
I will test this morning how grounding one signal affects the output.

Glad that you mentioned that 470k would dull the tone, because, it was sounding great when I tested the channel totally isolated with no mixer resistor, so something must have changed with the load?

I will report my findings in a few hours.

Thanks!

Fred.
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by talbany »

Fred
Just to be clear.
There are a number of ways you can do it. If you decide to go with the relays you could wire it one of 2 ways. Either ground out the channel your not using or 2 the no-load option which is to lose the mixing resistors and switch them through the relays.
Either one should still work and becomes up to your ears as to which one you prefer. If you just ground it out you still have a load there (220k to ground) Although judging by your last post it sounds like you prefer the sound of the no-load option. Again let your ears decide.
Looking forward to what you find.

Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
fred.violleau
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by fred.violleau »

Thanks again for all the suggestions Tony!

I did try to ground the unused signal and it works fine for the bluesmaster.
I will have to tame the Tweed channel, because it is still distorting.

So far I will add another relay, ground the unused the signal.
Bluesmaster, will not have any load. Tweed channel I am still debating with the best way to tame the output signal.

I will try a heavy load for now and see how it sounds.

In the meantime, need to order another relay and redoo my relay board.

Fred.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by martin manning »

I’m trying to understand the Tweed side schematic. Recall that a cathodyne PI (as used in the Tweed) has essentially unity gain, and now you are running it into a LTP, which has significant gain.
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by norburybrook »

martin manning wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 1:48 pm I’m trying to understand the Tweed side schematic. Recall that a cathodyne PI (as used in the Tweed) has essentially unity gain, and now you are running it into a LTP, which has significant gain.
I think that's the crux of the matter Martin.

can an amp have switchable phase inverters? i.e a Cathodyne for the tweed and a LTP for the BM feeding in to the output section.


M
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by martin manning »

You could, but it would be easier to attenuate the Tweed side output before mixing at the LTP input. Keeping all the Tweed gain stages in, to maintain its character, is probably a good idea; just has to be balanced with respect to the BM side.
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by norburybrook »

martin manning wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 2:02 pm You could, but it would be easier to attenuate the Tweed side output before mixing at the LTP input. Keeping all the Tweed gain stages in, to maintain its character, is probably a good idea; just has to be balanced with respect to the BM side.
but isn't the cathodyne PI a big part of the ' tweed' sound ?



M
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by martin manning »

My understanding is they are clean and well balanced unless driven into clipping, so I don’t think it’s a significant part. Notice the mods people make to the cathodyne PI are aimed at balancing it (Dumble) and keeping its operating point stable (Ampeg style fixed bias).
User avatar
didit
Posts: 1115
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: Canada

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by didit »

norburybrook wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 2:07 pm
martin manning wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 2:02 pm You could, but it would be easier to attenuate the Tweed side output before mixing at the LTP input. Keeping all the Tweed gain stages in, to maintain its character, is probably a good idea; just has to be balanced with respect to the BM side.
but isn't the cathodyne PI a big part of the ' tweed' sound ?
To a first order, yes. Entire output stage distortion has major contribution & particularly in those cathode-biased power tubes.

Best .. Ian
Last edited by didit on Mon Jul 22, 2019 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by erwin_ve »

martin manning wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 2:55 pm My understanding is they are clean and well balanced unless driven into clipping, so I don’t think it’s a significant part. Notice the mods people make to the cathodyne PI are aimed at balancing it (Dumble) and keeping its operating point stable (Ampeg style fixed bias).
My understanding was that the LNFB at the Tweedle Dee cathodyne PI was to make the transistion between clean and overdrive a bit smoother.
Do you mean that by the mods people make?
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by martin manning »

I forgot about that LNFB, yes that will help keep it under control. The “Ampeg mod” is something else done to 5E3’s outside of the Tweedle Dee context. Good point about the cathode biased power stage, Ian.
talbany
Posts: 4696
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists

Post by talbany »

fred.violleau wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 1:08 pm Thanks again for all the suggestions Tony!

I did try to ground the unused signal and it works fine for the bluesmaster.
I will have to tame the Tweed channel, because it is still distorting.

So far I will add another relay, ground the unused the signal.
Bluesmaster, will not have any load. Tweed channel I am still debating with the best way to tame the output signal.

I will try a heavy load for now and see how it sounds.

In the meantime, need to order another relay and redoo my relay board.

Fred.
Fred
Sounds good!. After you get the relays set up you can adjust the load resistor to set the amount of gain. However, there will be a point where if you go to heavy the amp will clean up but your tone might suffer so it's a balancing act. The 12 Ay should also help as well. I doubt you will get it totally clean. Remember the tone stack :wink:

Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
Post Reply