An amp cradle, heirloom quality

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
Noel Grassy
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:29 am
Location: Vacuum Tube Valley-Cali

An amp cradle, heirloom quality

Post by Noel Grassy »

I found this on George's forum, an amp cradle made for him.http://users.adelphia.net/~rtcook/chass ... 2_page.htm I think it looks as classy as any of the wooden ones if not better engineered. The thing is probably just a little too costly after chrome is applied. :wink: The one I use was built for the electronics industry and is all aluminum. Oddly, it rotates around as the hands of a clock do. As well as through it's horizontal axis.As you can guesss it required a "peminant" mounting location.
All excellent things are as difficult as they are rare__B Spinoza
BluzMike
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:47 pm

Re: An amp cradle, heirloom quality

Post by BluzMike »

Noel,

This looks just great and seems to be functionally excellent, too. The only thing is that I would prefer an amp cradle made of material that is totally resistant to electricity - and more affordable, too.

After feeling a bit uncomfortable with amps sitting on boxes when taking live measurements, I have recently bought the adjustable amp cradle from Weber VST, which turne dout to be badly designed. It does not let you adjust the width seemlessly (one more push-in nut, and it would). In addition to this, you cannot place a chassis in the rotatable arms, as the transformer and in some cases even the pre-amp tubes would hit the winged nuts that stand out on the inside.

Ted did not care to answer two polite mails that even included constructive hints how to improve the design. Unfortunately a very typical behavior for him.

So either buy the non-adjustable version or even better, build your own.

Michael
User avatar
benoit
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:44 pm

Re: An amp cradle, heirloom quality

Post by benoit »

Does anyone have plans for a cradle?
User avatar
toneman
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:14 am
Location: Romeoville Ill.

Re: An amp cradle, heirloom quality

Post by toneman »

PM sent
User avatar
toneman
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:14 am
Location: Romeoville Ill.

Handels to out side

Post by toneman »

Built this for my self. Works well
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
toneman
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:14 am
Location: Romeoville Ill.

Re: An amp cradle, heirloom quality

Post by toneman »

It's not a perfect finish but it works :)
User avatar
Funkalicousgroove
Posts: 2235
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: An amp cradle, heirloom quality

Post by Funkalicousgroove »

How much do you get for one of those? I want one!
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
roknroll
Posts: 225
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 2:13 am
Location: New York

weber cradle

Post by roknroll »

BluzMike wrote:Noel,

This looks just great and seems to be functionally excellent, too. The only thing is that I would prefer an amp cradle made of material that is totally resistant to electricity - and more affordable, too.

After feeling a bit uncomfortable with amps sitting on boxes when taking live measurements, I have recently bought the adjustable amp cradle from Weber VST, which turne dout to be badly designed. It does not let you adjust the width seemlessly (one more push-in nut, and it would). In addition to this, you cannot place a chassis in the rotatable arms, as the transformer and in some cases even the pre-amp tubes would hit the winged nuts that stand out on the inside.

Ted did not care to answer two polite mails that even included constructive hints how to improve the design. Unfortunately a very typical behavior for him.

So either buy the non-adjustable version or even better, build your own.

Michael
Funny
I had the same experience. Same problems with the cradle and no response from weber after a polite email. Additional problem I found the actual cradle arms are not long enough front to back. Even a standard blackface chassis will tip backwards if you apply to much downward force to the rear of the chassis whiole soldering or drilling, etc. Another 2-3 inches :lol: would make a big difference and definitely not drive the cost up. And yes one more nut would have done the trick.
regards
Post Reply