I've seen the warnings. What's the actual result?

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

vibratoking
Posts: 2640
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: I've seen the warnings. What's the actual result?

Post by vibratoking »

The loop in the Spicer schematic looks interesting, but the signal feeding the loop will have a lot less wave shaping when it gets mixed back in. Two gain stages are missing and I wonder how good/bad that will sound?

Mark - is there any schematic that you don't have? I'd hate to see your hard drive. Hoarder. :D
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: I've seen the warnings. What's the actual result?

Post by M Fowler »

No I have not tried this schematic I just collect interesting schematics and layouts for reference. :lol:
User avatar
rooster
Posts: 1622
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:50 am
Location: Pacific NW

Re: I've seen the warnings. What's the actual result?

Post by rooster »

Alright, I've decided on a course of action. I'm going to install the Granger in a parallel manner using the last schematic idea from Mark, attaching to the split signal after V1. then I'm going to return it after V3, but use a 250K linear pot to 'mix' in the efx to the PI. I think this may work out but I will let you know. Thank you, all of you, for all the ideas. You're a great bunch of guys - anybody tell you that lately? :lol:
Most people stall out when fixing a mistake that they've made. Why?
Post Reply