New Dumblator / questions

[angelodp]

Here is how I did my S/P Dlator. I converted a series unit to operate both S & P. Nice and quiet all around and the bypass is a very useful feature as well.

A

[IMG2911]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... -S-P-3.jpg[/img]
[IMG1040]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... 2pic-1.jpg[/img]
[IMG919]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... 2pic-2.jpg[/img]
[IMG922]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... 2pic-3.jpg[/img]

[hans-jörg]

Thank you, very helpfully.
I will compare yours with mine.
But mostly I solved the problem of popping and noise. I´v now only one starground (exept powerboard), shielded and corrected layout of grid cables. So there is no more noise and the switching is close to optimal. Nevertheless I will give it a chance with your layout too. Lets see if there could be something better.
By the way: after testing with Master almost open: great fat sound of Dumble w/Dlator. Rearly a big kick forward, evan with no effect in.

Thank you guys!

Hans-Jörg

[hans-jörg]

Hi,
could somebody explain me whatfor is the 100k before the 0,05 cap?
Its located between this cap and the bypass. Its not in the original schema and Tom writes - if neccessary, or so.

Thank you
Hans-Jörg

[Structo]

Hopefully Claus will answer that since he designed the loop.
I don't recall why that is there.
I just drew the layout.

[bluesfendermanblues]

The 100k resistor at the input is optional.

However, the resistor help avoiding that the amps master volume acts as a high pass filter, if run below 10 0'clock.

If you set the amps master volume at 11-12 o'clock....

(like I do with a 68p cap across wiper and input in order to retain highs in spite for cable runs to/from dumbleator)

....the input resistor is not necessary.

[hans-jörg]

Oh, thank you for the answer.
Because mostley I will be under Master 10 I`ll use the 100k.

Best

Hans-Jörg

Edit: wrong. With Dlator I´m with the Master all the time at 12 :00 and more. But regulating with the Recover Pot. So, the 100k falls.