HRM

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
drz400
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 4:53 pm

HRM

Post by drz400 »

IS there any reason NOT to have the HRM EQ on the front?
It seems like this would be useful and easy to fit into a Fender style layout
User avatar
Tdale
Posts: 742
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:24 pm
Location: Norway

Re: HRM

Post by Tdale »

I have wondered about the same thing myself. Even if the pots usually are tuned to a good position, and left there, still, they are pots, and can be adjusted, so why not put them on the front?

I used a precicion 10-turn pot for my OD entrance, and it can be adjusted underneath the chassis.

I also tried something I haven't seen before. I put a dtdp switch right underneatch the MV pot (bottom of chassis) and wired it just like the Clean/OD switch, so that I can switch the send/return wires out of the circuit, so that the signal goes directely from the MV to the PI, withouth going through the send/return loop, when it's not used.

Haved fired it up yet, but I'm excited to find out there will be a noise-benefit..

Tommy
User avatar
fabiomayo
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:40 pm
Location: Niteroi, RJ - Brasil

Re: HRM

Post by fabiomayo »

My HRM built by a local tech has the post-OD EQ on the back of the amp,
with little cheap pedal knobs. It solves the problem of access but in my
opinion, it should at leas be graduated. I'd like it even better if it was
complete with fullsize knobs. But it does work fine!


In any case, I hardly ever change the settings so they might as well be
placed inside the chassis and keep signal runs shorter...
User avatar
Tdale
Posts: 742
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:24 pm
Location: Norway

Re: HRM

Post by Tdale »

or placed inside, where they normally are, but with a shaft coming out under the chassis.... same signal way, easier access

Tommy
Normster
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:26 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: HRM

Post by Normster »

fabiomayo wrote:In any case, I hardly ever change the settings so they might as well be placed inside the chassis and keep signal runs shorter...
BINGO! If you look closely at the Dumble pics that have circulated on the web, you'll notice that HAD put a lot of thought into the length of the signal runs. Any time you deviate from his layout, you probably end up with more wire.
User avatar
fabiomayo
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:40 pm
Location: Niteroi, RJ - Brasil

Re: HRM

Post by fabiomayo »

Tdale wrote:or placed inside, where they normally are, but with a shaft coming out under the chassis.... same signal way, easier access

Tommy
That sounds like a good idea!

I completely agree with you, Normster. About the signal runs in Dumble pictures, that is...
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: HRM

Post by Bob-I »

drz400 wrote:IS there any reason NOT to have the HRM EQ on the front?
It seems like this would be useful and easy to fit into a Fender style layout
No, no reason other than that's the way HAD did it. He's not the end all of engineers so roll your own.
Post Reply