This kind of pisses me off

[selloutrr]

http://www.stu-daddyamps.com/servlet/th ... Categories

This is kind of shit that ruines it for the rest of us.

[JamesHealey]

No need to have a tw logo! Come on fischer family sue them defend your trademark. Instead of picking on cloners who do it for a hobby

[Zippy]

Is this another mystery TAG member?

I see in his disclaimer that he is not affiliated with any companies - yet he omits TrainWreck from the list. Is Stu-Daddy sanctioned by Ken's family?

Using the TW logo is a real stretch...

[PCollen]

http://www.stu-daddyamps.com/servlet/th ... Categories

This is kind of shit that ruines it for the rest of us.

Really..can you be more specific as to exactly why, and who is 'the rest of us' ?

[Cliff Schecht]

http://www.stu-daddyamps.com/servlet/th ... Categories

This is kind of shit that ruines it for the rest of us.

Really..can you be more specific as to exactly why, and who is 'the rest of us' ?

It doesn't ruin much of anything for us methinks but I doubt they will be using that logo for too long..

[bcmatt]

I wonder why he also doesn't use the Fender logo on his Tweed amps.

[selloutrr]

It popped up while I was yahoo image searching Trainwreck liverpool then Trainwreck rocket. I curious to see what I could find on Ginger, the 2nd page was that website. The image was the logo pic.

It does seem like it could be a TAG member or at least a site visitor, since they offer the NAT chassis Dumble and TW.

EDIT- It doesn't "ruine" at least not direct cause and effect, but it does give the estate a reason to hastle the forum. As well as any KF built trainwreck owner's, tech's, etc. a reason to distance themselves from sharing knowledge.

[Allynmey]

No one has "right" to hassle the forum about anything. He isn't here. Just some guy putting a logo on a clone. Guys a clown.

[selloutrr]

I didn't say they had a "right" only a reason and all to often they confuse the two which ends in a hassle.

[paulster]

He can't be from here anyway. He's using MM transformers!

[Gibsonman63]

So let me get this straight. Is it the use of the logo or the two week turnaround that is going to ruffle feathers?

[PCollen]

I didn't say they had a "right" only a reason and all to often they confuse the two which ends in a hassle.

There is no reason at all to hassle this forum, just because a member posted the web-site link of the 'bad guy' who 'ruines it for the rest of us'. That would be like charging a guy with being a pimp just because he writes the name and number of a girl on the bathroom wall.

I think the issue would be soley with Stu-Daddy and his use of the T-wreck logo, and they should THANK SELLOUTR for bringing it to their attention, albeit indirectly. Aside from that, Stu-Daddy can build and sell all the T-wreck clones he can...and more power to him. There is no copyright or patent on the amp, is there ?

[steviea55]

IMHO, Selloutrr is right. No one should put the logo on with-out permission from the family. However he may have that agreement with them.

[Richie]

wow.. i need to up prices on amps i build.. i guess the MM transformers is a markup. And the Logo. Sometimes the logo can be thousands more to have it on an amp.

[M Fowler]

I received a threat from Stu-Daddy that he would sue me for the slanderous statement I posted: the disclaimer statement he posted on ebay which he then modified. Also saying my posts could be construed as threatening because I wanted to take a road trip in a motor home?

I am quite sure the rest of you understood that I enjoy visting with fellow amp builders and have plans to attend amp shows when I retire but apparently I am not welcome to bring a motor home anywhere near Michigan so I quess I better tell Bruce Egnator I am not coming to visit his shop.

Boy this guy is a piece of work.