Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- David Root
- Posts: 3540
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
- Location: Chilliwack BC
Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
Anyone tried this? Does it have anything to offer vs. the conventional plate feed from V1A? Did HAD ever use it eg in SSS?
I am wondering if it would improve the amp's ability to project in a mix.
Also what about a CF feed to the OD section ie between V1B and the OD relay? Any perceived benefit there?
I am wondering if it would improve the amp's ability to project in a mix.
Also what about a CF feed to the OD section ie between V1B and the OD relay? Any perceived benefit there?
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
As far as I remember right now he did not, at least not in one of the amps I am familiar with.David Root wrote:Did HAD ever use it eg in SSS?
Max
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
DaveAlso what about a CF feed to the OD section ie between V1B and the OD relay? Any perceived benefit there?
Iv'e done some experimenting with CF within various gain stages and here is what I concluded..
CF set up like a buffer (Marshall type) lower impedance so in this situation( a low-level signal application), you want maximum voltage transfer, not maximum power transfer (Like output section) in order to achieve this the source impedance must be at least 10 times lower than the load impedance, you're okay, because you'll get 90% of signal transfer so you need to be aware of this when implementing the low impedance source within the gain stages..If not you will end up loosing quite a bit of voltage/gain and the amp will sound choked..Also The lower the source impedance, the less high end you'll lose in the preceding gain stages so the buffer becomes a sort of treble booster (Generally a no no when designing a OD stage)..CF generally work best when using long cables like the front of your pedal board, or effects loops for outboard gear or in the caes of the Bassman driving tone stacks that preceed the OP section and of coarse feeding the OP tubes grids for greater headroom..The only place where a CF might be implemented in an ODS style amp is before the HRM tonestack.. I remember several trying this and commenting that it really didn't buy them much in the way of tone..Everybody is different your ears might be different... Good Luck!!
Layout provided by Normster
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
Carlton's amp.... Sort of.....
talbany wrote:DaveAlso what about a CF feed to the OD section ie between V1B and the OD relay? Any perceived benefit there?
Iv'e done some experimenting with CF within various gain stages and here is what I concluded..
CF set up like a buffer (Marshall type) lower impedance so in this situation( a low-level signal application), you want maximum voltage transfer, not maximum power transfer (Like output section) in order to achieve this the source impedance must be at least 10 times lower than the load impedance, you're okay, because you'll get 90% of signal transfer so you need to be aware of this when implementing the low impedance source within the gain stages..If not you will end up loosing quite a bit of voltage/gain and the amp will sound choked..Also The lower the source impedance, the less high end you'll lose in the preceding gain stages so the buffer becomes a sort of treble booster (Generally a no no when designing a OD stage)..CF generally work best when using long cables like the front of your pedal board, or effects loops for outboard gear or in the caes of the Bassman driving tone stacks that preceed the OP section and of coarse feeding the OP tubes grids for greater headroom..The only place where a CF might be implemented in an ODS style amp is before the HRM tonestack.. I remember several trying this and commenting that it really didn't buy them much in the way of tone..Everybody is different your ears might be different... Good Luck!!
Layout provided by Normster
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
ScottCarlton's amp.... Sort of.....
I can see where you could sub V2A for the CF drive the HRM low impedance and have only 3 gain stages when in OD for those who don't like alot of gain in their OD tone (depending on how you set it up).. You would no doubt have to make several other design changes.. I imagine the BM stack/NFB would work well here and could let the amp run a bit more open in OD...Take Care!!
Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
- David Root
- Posts: 3540
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
- Location: Chilliwack BC
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
Thanx to all, I knew someone had to have looked at this before.
I was interested in voltage transfer from V1A to the tonestack, ~37K V1A plate into ~4.5M CF, out of CF at 600 ohms, now a source into way more than 6K ohms in the tonestack has to pass more signal than ~37K V1A plate would directly into the tonesatck, yes/no?
Or did I miss something?
I was interested in voltage transfer from V1A to the tonestack, ~37K V1A plate into ~4.5M CF, out of CF at 600 ohms, now a source into way more than 6K ohms in the tonestack has to pass more signal than ~37K V1A plate would directly into the tonesatck, yes/no?
Or did I miss something?
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
Dave
Do you plan on doing it like the layout I posted?.. If it's different can you write out the topology..
Tony
Do you plan on doing it like the layout I posted?.. If it's different can you write out the topology..
Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
- David Root
- Posts: 3540
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
- Location: Chilliwack BC
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
I would put it ahead of the non-HRM tonestack.
V1A is CL1. V1B is the CF. V1B cathode feeds slope resistor and treble pot coupling resistor etc., treble pot wiper to vol pot in, vol pot wiper to V2A, which is CL2.
V3 is OD, V4 has to be added for the PI. V2B is not used.
Requires some reorganization on the board, I didn't look at that yet.
OR
V1A and B in parallel is CL1, V2A is the CF, V2B is CL2... etc as before.
V1A is CL1. V1B is the CF. V1B cathode feeds slope resistor and treble pot coupling resistor etc., treble pot wiper to vol pot in, vol pot wiper to V2A, which is CL2.
V3 is OD, V4 has to be added for the PI. V2B is not used.
Requires some reorganization on the board, I didn't look at that yet.
OR
V1A and B in parallel is CL1, V2A is the CF, V2B is CL2... etc as before.
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
IIRC this is the dave funk mod to black face amps. Recovery after the tone stack is the stolen gain stage from the reverb driver. 12AX7.
- David Root
- Posts: 3540
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
- Location: Chilliwack BC
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
I was looking at a 6G6 schematic, but that has two tonestack recovery stages (sort of). All I'm doing is putting in the CF between the first stage and the tonestack, it's still CL 1 to CL2, single tonestack recovery stage.
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
Cool!.. Just my personal preference but I prefer at least 2 gain stages to drive the CF.. it seems to give the stack more range especially low end.. Your ears and style may tell you differently..David Root wrote:I would put it ahead of the non-HRM tonestack.
V1A is CL1. V1B is the CF. V1B cathode feeds slope resistor and treble pot coupling resistor etc., treble pot wiper to vol pot in, vol pot wiper to V2A, which is CL2.
V3 is OD, V4 has to be added for the PI. V2B is not used.
Requires some reorganization on the board, I didn't look at that yet.
OR
V1A and B in parallel is CL1, V2A is the CF, V2B is CL2... etc as before.
Personally I would look at the JTM/Bassman Vol- input then after the 2nd gain stage drive the follower then TS out of the top of the treble pot to the relay then to however you want to set up the OD section..
Tony
Last edited by talbany on Sat Jan 04, 2014 6:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
- David Root
- Posts: 3540
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
- Location: Chilliwack BC
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
OK Tony, that is very interesting, so you have to build up a head of steam, so to speak, with two gain stages, before hitting the CF to the tonestack.
Would a pentode adequately replace two triodes in this, eg 5879? I like 5879s, this does not necessarily have to be a "Dumble-y" solution.
Would a pentode adequately replace two triodes in this, eg 5879? I like 5879s, this does not necessarily have to be a "Dumble-y" solution.
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
That's a great questionDavid Root wrote:
Would a pentode adequately replace two triodes in this, eg 5879? I like 5879s, this does not necessarily have to be a "Dumble-y" solution.
Tony
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
Exactly, that's what I know as the dave Funk mod.David Root wrote:I was looking at a 6G6 schematic, but that has two tonestack recovery stages (sort of). All I'm doing is putting in the CF between the first stage and the tonestack, it's still CL 1 to CL2, single tonestack recovery stage.
jelle
- FUCHSAUDIO
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
- Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
- Contact:
Re: Cathode Follower Feed to Tonestack in Dumble Circuit
Actually pretty "anti-dumble" imho. The whole premise of the D-style OD is a pair of gain stages, each clipping one side of the waveform to produce even order and balanced overdrive. Doing one OD stage and a CF is more Marshall-like, and heaver on the odd-order harmonics, with a harder clip. More aggressive for sure, even when tamed by a post OD stack or trimmer. I haven't much like LC's od tones for the last few years, now I know why...lol.dogears wrote:Carlton's amp.... Sort of.....
talbany wrote:DaveAlso what about a CF feed to the OD section ie between V1B and the OD relay? Any perceived benefit there?
Iv'e done some experimenting with CF within various gain stages and here is what I concluded..
CF set up like a buffer (Marshall type) lower impedance so in this situation( a low-level signal application), you want maximum voltage transfer, not maximum power transfer (Like output section) in order to achieve this the source impedance must be at least 10 times lower than the load impedance, you're okay, because you'll get 90% of signal transfer so you need to be aware of this when implementing the low impedance source within the gain stages..If not you will end up loosing quite a bit of voltage/gain and the amp will sound choked..Also The lower the source impedance, the less high end you'll lose in the preceding gain stages so the buffer becomes a sort of treble booster (Generally a no no when designing a OD stage)..CF generally work best when using long cables like the front of your pedal board, or effects loops for outboard gear or in the caes of the Bassman driving tone stacks that preceed the OP section and of coarse feeding the OP tubes grids for greater headroom..The only place where a CF might be implemented in an ODS style amp is before the HRM tonestack.. I remember several trying this and commenting that it really didn't buy them much in the way of tone..Everybody is different your ears might be different... Good Luck!!
Layout provided by Normster
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.