Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Just attach the print with double sided tape and drill.
Former owner of Music Mechanix
www.RedPlateAmps.com
www.RedPlateAmps.com
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Here is a rough, rough draft of a layout. Still only about 1/2 way there, but the missing parts are pretty standard.
I wanted to get the unique things done first, like the main board, the single relay wiring, the front switches (slide switches, so the wiring is upside down from the 'usual') and the cathode ground arrangement on the 6l6s.
I wanted to get the unique things done first, like the main board, the single relay wiring, the front switches (slide switches, so the wiring is upside down from the 'usual') and the cathode ground arrangement on the 6l6s.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
I was curious about the wiring of the relay on #40. The photos show it real well (as shown in the layout I posted), but it did not make any sense in the context of any relay wiring I was familiar with.
However, I found this relay schematic that I bet was similar to the relay on #40. Now the wiring makes sense.
However, I found this relay schematic that I bet was similar to the relay on #40. Now the wiring makes sense.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Updated #40 schematic. A bunch of small details added and errors corrected.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Hi IC,
maybe you could use this pic for your schematic
(if you don't have it already).
BTW great work, many thanks!
Juergen
maybe you could use this pic for your schematic
(if you don't have it already).
BTW great work, many thanks!
Juergen
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
That is very helpful. I can see that there is a second ground coming off the back of the capacitor board. The other pictures did not show this area.
Also I have found the 'hidden' resistors!!! They are right between the two large caps, like I figured, after seeing the Winterland pictures.
Also I have found the 'hidden' resistors!!! They are right between the two large caps, like I figured, after seeing the Winterland pictures.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
bluesfendermanblues
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: Dumble City, Europe
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Impressive work
- is the schematic/layout identical to the 70's schem?
- is the schematic/layout identical to the 70's schem?
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
On the schematic the component values without anything after them are from the 70s schematic. All others have a letter in parentheses that denotes where the value came from. There are quite a few differences from the 70s schematic.bluesfendermanblues wrote:Impressive work![]()
![]()
![]()
- is the schematic/layout identical to the 70's schem?
I'll probably populate the layout with the same values as the schematic. So the layout and the schematic will be as close to #40 as I can get them.
I finished the layout last night and now can start to cut the boards.
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Well, here it is, the layout for #40. It was a little more work than I thought, because I had to draw all the components, as I did not have any kind of component library or anything like that.
I did not include the PT's main's wiring because I have no clue how that 'international' PT is wired to the switch. I'm going to put a standard US voltage PT in mine, but did not want to put that in the layout because it's not what is in the actual amp. So I just left that portion of the wiring out.
I did not put values on the OD entrance components because I presume I will have to tweak to find the ones that work. Same with the two caps on the Bass pot. Either way, the layout goes hand-in-hand with the schematic.
I did not include the PT's main's wiring because I have no clue how that 'international' PT is wired to the switch. I'm going to put a standard US voltage PT in mine, but did not want to put that in the layout because it's not what is in the actual amp. So I just left that portion of the wiring out.
I did not put values on the OD entrance components because I presume I will have to tweak to find the ones that work. Same with the two caps on the Bass pot. Either way, the layout goes hand-in-hand with the schematic.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- UltraHookedOnPhonix
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:32 pm
- Location: Dumbleland
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Beatiful work! Very nice job!
This is probably common knowledge but the Triad xformer marked, "17-7806" denotes batch code followed by a date code (6th week of 1978). Maybe label the filament transformer with F-313X instead.
Here's the datasheet for anyone interested:
This is probably common knowledge but the Triad xformer marked, "17-7806" denotes batch code followed by a date code (6th week of 1978). Maybe label the filament transformer with F-313X instead.
Here's the datasheet for anyone interested:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
I did not know the date codes on these, thanks for the info. I was trying to figure out if the pictures posted by runaway 3 were of an amp earlier or later than #40, but the date codes on the transformers are too close to each other.UltraHookedOnPhonix wrote:Beatiful work! Very nice job!
This is probably common knowledge but the Triad xformer marked, "17-7806" denotes batch code followed by a date code (6th week of 1978). Maybe label the filament transformer with F-313X instead.
Here's the datasheet for anyone interested:
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
The pic is one I copied amongst others from ebay some month ago.
Here is the complete set. The amps serial number starts with 3, so it shouldn't be much older.
Cheers,
Jürgen
Here is the complete set. The amps serial number starts with 3, so it shouldn't be much older.
Cheers,
Jürgen
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Thanks for posting the pictures.
Well, the more I think about it, actually making this amp won't be that hard. The hard part (the layout) is already done. The rest of it is just soldering everything together.
Here are the boards, ready for components.
Well, the more I think about it, actually making this amp won't be that hard. The hard part (the layout) is already done. The rest of it is just soldering everything together.
Here are the boards, ready for components.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Wouldn't that be serial number 3X as in thirty something?? As in the poster did not want to divuge the serial??
Runaway J wrote:The pic is one I copied amongst others from ebay some month ago.
Here is the complete set. The amps serial number starts with 3, so it shouldn't be much older.
Cheers,
Jürgen
Re: Just for fun: Attempt at #40 schematic...
Re-thinking the cathode resistor on the 6L6s.
When I first saw this resistor (under the 'death cap') I figured it was a one-ohm bias resistor. However, it looks like it is connected to the cathodes of both tubes (via the yellow wire). So, one just halves the value and you get an average for both tubes. But this does not really seem like the thing HAD would do. He certainly would want to know each tubes individual current.
Then I was working on my Sundown amp and realized both of its 6L6 cathodes were also tied together. They run to a rheostat that can limit the output.
Then I thought that perhaps #40 was set up to be a 'low power' or 'half power' amp. Not everyone needs 50W and perhaps if that is like a 200 ohm resistor it would cut the power to like 25W. Sort of a built in power attenuator.
When I first saw this resistor (under the 'death cap') I figured it was a one-ohm bias resistor. However, it looks like it is connected to the cathodes of both tubes (via the yellow wire). So, one just halves the value and you get an average for both tubes. But this does not really seem like the thing HAD would do. He certainly would want to know each tubes individual current.
Then I was working on my Sundown amp and realized both of its 6L6 cathodes were also tied together. They run to a rheostat that can limit the output.
Then I thought that perhaps #40 was set up to be a 'low power' or 'half power' amp. Not everyone needs 50W and perhaps if that is like a 200 ohm resistor it would cut the power to like 25W. Sort of a built in power attenuator.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.