UltraPhonix with a few twists
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- 
				fred.violleau
 - Posts: 555
 - Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
 - Location: Montreal, Canada
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
Even the Super Reverb schematic does not talk about an orange tap. 
Although I found a replacemen PT that seems to match the description, but I am missing the heaters CT...
Fred.
			
			
						Although I found a replacemen PT that seems to match the description, but I am missing the heaters CT...
Fred.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
			
									
						Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
Hi Fred, recently got the same with my PT. https://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 30#p397917. It is the tap connected to the transformer iron, creating a faraday shield when grounded.
			
			
									
									
						- 
				fred.violleau
 - Posts: 555
 - Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
 - Location: Montreal, Canada
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
Thanks Erwin_we!
So if I want to test for continuity in order to validate the orange wire is connected to the core, it should have continuity with both sides?
Fred.
			
			
													So if I want to test for continuity in order to validate the orange wire is connected to the core, it should have continuity with both sides?
Fred.
					Last edited by fred.violleau on Tue May 28, 2019 12:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
									
			
									
						Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
It isnt connected to the primary or secondary. Think about it like a shielded wire.fred.violleau wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 12:43 pm Thanks Erwin_we!
So if I want to test for continuity in order to validate the orange wire is connected to the core, it should have continuity with both sides? Primary and secondary?
Fred.
- norburybrook
 - Posts: 3290
 - Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
 - Location: London
 - Contact:
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
just test it against the Transformer body for continuity in that case.
M
			
			
									
									
						M
- 
				fred.violleau
 - Posts: 555
 - Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
 - Location: Montreal, Canada
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
Thanks Marcus and Erwin_ve 
Yeah giving a second thought and looking at your drawing Erwin, I was like it cannot connect.. you confirmed it!
Thanks guys! Tonight I should install the OT.
Fred.
			
			
									
									
						Yeah giving a second thought and looking at your drawing Erwin, I was like it cannot connect.. you confirmed it!
Thanks guys! Tonight I should install the OT.
Fred.
- pompeiisneaks
 - Site Admin
 - Posts: 4244
 - Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
 - Location: Washington State, USA
 - Contact:
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
Often orange is the faraday cage. Grounds some more hum from the transformer.fred.violleau wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 11:04 am Took a pic of the actual wires:
IMG_20190527_201600.jpg
2 black primary wires
2 green heaters wires 6.6v
2 yellow rect heaters 5.2v
2 red HT 713v
1 red & blue 50v bias tap
1 red and yellow HT CT
1 orange Primary ground?
@Martin, I will check continuity tonight!
Fred.
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
						- 
				fred.violleau
 - Posts: 555
 - Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
 - Location: Montreal, Canada
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
Thanks guys !
As I am using an old fender Super Reverb Output Transformer, I only have a 2 Ohms tap.
How should I adjust the negative feedback resistor value? For now it is 4.7k 2w. Rule of thumb from what I have seen on a schematics and layouts is value of the resistor is decreasing with the Ohms output value. So 4.7k for a 4 ohms NFB would you imply 2.xk for a 2 Ohms output ? 2.4k, 2.7k?
Fred.
			
			
									
									
						As I am using an old fender Super Reverb Output Transformer, I only have a 2 Ohms tap.
How should I adjust the negative feedback resistor value? For now it is 4.7k 2w. Rule of thumb from what I have seen on a schematics and layouts is value of the resistor is decreasing with the Ohms output value. So 4.7k for a 4 ohms NFB would you imply 2.xk for a 2 Ohms output ? 2.4k, 2.7k?
Fred.
- 
				fred.violleau
 - Posts: 555
 - Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
 - Location: Montreal, Canada
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
And BTW, can't get to connect through the Tapatalk app. Anyone else having this issue?
			
			
									
									
						- norburybrook
 - Posts: 3290
 - Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
 - Location: London
 - Contact:
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
yes, I've been having the same problems whilst on the road this last few weeks.fred.violleau wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:23 pm And BTW, can't get to connect through the Tapatalk app. Anyone else having this issue?
M
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
You could try 4k7/1,4=±3k3fred.violleau wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:15 pm Thanks guys !
As I am using an old fender Super Reverb Output Transformer, I only have a 2 Ohms tap.
How should I adjust the negative feedback resistor value? For now it is 4.7k 2w. Rule of thumb from what I have seen on a schematics and layouts is value of the resistor is decreasing with the Ohms output value. So 4.7k for a 4 ohms NFB would you imply 2.xk for a 2 Ohms output ? 2.4k, 2.7k?
Fred.
- pompeiisneaks
 - Site Admin
 - Posts: 4244
 - Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
 - Location: Washington State, USA
 - Contact:
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
I mentioned this in the 'site problems' thread. they were notifying me I had an out of date addon, so I updated it and broke it, and I can't get it working again, I'll try again later, but their instructions basically don't work to do an update.norburybrook wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:39 pmyes, I've been having the same problems whilst on the road this last few weeks.fred.violleau wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:23 pm And BTW, can't get to connect through the Tapatalk app. Anyone else having this issue?
M
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
						- 
				fred.violleau
 - Posts: 555
 - Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
 - Location: Montreal, Canada
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
@erwin_we thanks! If I leave the value to 4.7k it means I am "blocking" or "adding" more feedback?
Would I really hear the difference between the two? I might try to leave it on and then clip a resistor in parallel and let me ears decide
I checked on my voltages and the output is like 480 VDC on B+2. Quite high... I am assuming that since I don't have anything hooked up but the power tube filtering it is normal. My goal is to debug as I go so I have less to do in the end. I have almost finished hooking up the PI. Next is the onboard D-lator and then I should be able to plug in the return Jack and see if I get a sound right?
@Phil thks for the update, hopefully it will get sorted and posting will be as easy as it used to be
Fred.
			
			
									
									
						Would I really hear the difference between the two? I might try to leave it on and then clip a resistor in parallel and let me ears decide
I checked on my voltages and the output is like 480 VDC on B+2. Quite high... I am assuming that since I don't have anything hooked up but the power tube filtering it is normal. My goal is to debug as I go so I have less to do in the end. I have almost finished hooking up the PI. Next is the onboard D-lator and then I should be able to plug in the return Jack and see if I get a sound right?
@Phil thks for the update, hopefully it will get sorted and posting will be as easy as it used to be
Fred.
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
Leaving the gnfb resistor at 4k7 @ 2 Ohm is less negative feedback and you have more high end. The difference between 4k7 and 3k3 is noticeable. It's a matter of taste choosing between the two.fred.violleau wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:49 am @erwin_we thanks! If I leave the value to 4.7k it means I am "blocking" or "adding" more feedback?
Would I really hear the difference between the two? I might try to leave it on and then clip a resistor in parallel and let me ears decide
I checked on my voltages and the output is like 480 VDC on B+2. Quite high... I am assuming that since I don't have anything hooked up but the power tube filtering it is normal. My goal is to debug as I go so I have less to do in the end. I have almost finished hooking up the PI. Next is the onboard D-lator and then I should be able to plug in the return Jack and see if I get a sound right?
@Phil thks for the update, hopefully it will get sorted and posting will be as easy as it used to be
Fred.
Yes a unloaded B+ means higher voltages. It will come together once all tubes are in.
When finishing the PI don't forget to hook up the bias circuit.
- 
				fred.violleau
 - Posts: 555
 - Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:20 pm
 - Location: Montreal, Canada
 
Re: UltraPhonix with a few twists
Thanks for the info erwin_ve !
I have made progress and have plugged in the tweed channel. Works fine.
Here is an updated layout with the latest developments: I still have a few questions : I added a switching input with a relay so I can toggle between channel A (Tweedle Dee Bright channel) and channel B (bluesmaster).
1 - I hope the input switching wiring is good, can someone confirm?
2- Will it induce a major "pop" when channel is being switched?
I also added a red circle at the output of both channels before they feed the onboard D-lator. My initial layout was without mixing resistors. I added some based on some UP pictures although, values may differ a lot.
3- Do I need the mixing resistors?
4- If I do need these, what value would you recommend ?
5- Am I right to assume the higher the value of the mixing resistor, the more loss on the signal strength down the line?
Thanks for your input, and I hope you all enjoy a great summer!
Cheers!
Fred.
			
			
						I have made progress and have plugged in the tweed channel. Works fine.
Here is an updated layout with the latest developments: I still have a few questions : I added a switching input with a relay so I can toggle between channel A (Tweedle Dee Bright channel) and channel B (bluesmaster).
1 - I hope the input switching wiring is good, can someone confirm?
2- Will it induce a major "pop" when channel is being switched?
I also added a red circle at the output of both channels before they feed the onboard D-lator. My initial layout was without mixing resistors. I added some based on some UP pictures although, values may differ a lot.
3- Do I need the mixing resistors?
4- If I do need these, what value would you recommend ?
5- Am I right to assume the higher the value of the mixing resistor, the more loss on the signal strength down the line?
Thanks for your input, and I hope you all enjoy a great summer!
Cheers!
Fred.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.