Structo....question 4 U

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Structo....question 4 U

Post by iknowjohnny »

I was looking at an old thread where i had asked about low end tightening and you graciously made a very long reply for me. I don't recall what i did with that info, as it was a while back, but at one point you said the following about tightening the lows in the PI and PA....
PI and output tweaks - I saved the best for last - you can really make or break an amp in this section. For max headroom try and use the smallest PI entrance cap you can (a lot of Fenders used .001!) and larger output tube grid resistors (I like 5k1s better than 3k3s) Screens on 6L6s sound better to me at 500 rather than 1k. If you have a trim pot to balance the plates make sure you can adjust them to within 5 volts of each other if not change one RP until you can, start at 5 volt difference and then very slowly increase as you strum a chord through the amp - you are trying to get maximum overtones - you'll know it when you find it.
I'm particularly interested in the text in bold and was hoping you could clarify this for me. When you mention a trim pot, can i assume you mean to balance the voltages on the 2 plates in the PI tube, and if so can you point me to schematic with that? And can i assume you are saying that the closer the plate voltages the tighter the low end? You mention overtones so i'm not sure if you mean this is a method to gain more harmonics or tighten the lows. Thanks.
User avatar
Marvel
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:53 am
Location: Zamosc, Poland
Contact:

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by Marvel »

I know my name isn't Structo, but... :D

Attached you'll find the schem. I don't think you balance for equal voltage with a DMM. You balance for richest harmonics with a guitar. Usually you'll end up with 5V difference. I have no idea about the bottom end though...

Regards, Marcin
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by iknowjohnny »

Thanks, that answers some of my questions, and i will try it for the harmonics. Still waiting to see if structo can tell me whether this also relates to low end tightness. I think i WILL try the 1000PF coupler into the PI tho.
Last edited by iknowjohnny on Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
andyhardy
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:23 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by andyhardy »

That post was actually from Henry aka heisthl

https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... t=tweaking
User avatar
dobbhill
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:04 am
Location: Louisiana

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by dobbhill »

Here's a good one about PI trimmers..
https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... ht=balance
D
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.......
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by Structo »

Hi Johnny,

Not sure when I posted that but yes, I believe it is something Henry posted in a thread that I repeated.

As far as I know larger swamper resistors, making grid couplers smaller, larger plate filtering, more negative feedback can also tighten bottom.

Screen resistors can also affect it as well, but is subtle until you are blasting.

The PI trimming is more about harmonic overtones and sustain.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by Bob-I »

PI trimming is about the AC swing, not the DC voltage. I've had some tubes where the DC was quite far off, 10-12V but the AC balance was good.

Use the adjustment method in the thread above and you'll get not only max headroom but harmonics as well.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by Structo »

Can you measure the ac voltage across the plates to get it close?
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by Bob-I »

Structo wrote:Can you measure the ac voltage across the plates to get it close?
check out the thread dobbhill pointed to. It takes a dummy load resistor and a signal generator. The other method is to use dogears, he'll make the adjustment by feel and be right on the money. I double checked his adjustment and it couldn't be more balanced. :wink:
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by Structo »

I don't have dogears :(


Hey, but my Rottweiler does!


Lilly! Lilly here Lilly!

What do ya think girl?

[img:400:300]http://lh4.ggpht.com/_MHnI-B0pJ8k/TMIpz ... G_0663.JPG[/img]

[img:400:372]http://lh4.ggpht.com/_MHnI-B0pJ8k/TMIpz ... G_0664.JPG[/img]

[img:800:658]http://lh6.ggpht.com/_MHnI-B0pJ8k/TMIqp ... G_0660.JPG[/img]

She's no help...... :lol:
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
Dr-Joned
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: The Great South, USA

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by Dr-Joned »

Is there any loading caused by the output section? From this I am asking once you balance the PI section, does the balance stay effective even if you switch power tubes?
I Think I Think Too Much !
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Structo....question 4 U

Post by iknowjohnny »

Cute pooch to be sure. By the way, in my post where i said i'd try a 100pf cap, i meant to say 1000pf. I just edited it but just wanted to mention it so you don't all think i'm even more stupid than i probably appear. :D
Post Reply