Not to be negative
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10189
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: Not to be negative
It's blue in all directions and flashing. I should pull over.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
Re: Not to be negative
Whoa, that's bad.Reeltarded wrote:It's blue in all directions and flashing. I should pull over.
My light is a pink glow. I think I'm going in the opposite direction.
See ya soon!
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10189
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: Not to be negative
For a second I was thinking about throwing things at a camera so you could see finer details because the light would hit the object faster in your direction then I remembered gamma rays and you know it doesn't make sense to get a better look at a child or most anything else by throwing them toward a camera at 99.998% the speed of light, better just to soak whatever in gamma rays but you probably need a special camera too.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
-
eniam rognab
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2013 4:06 am
Re: Not to be negative
"feel not that it is a sphere we live on.. but rather an infinite plane, which has the illusion of leading yourself back to the point of origin"
Re: Not to be negative
Reeltarded wrote:For a second I was thinking about throwing things at a camera so you could see finer details because the light would hit the object faster in your direction then I remembered gamma rays and you know it doesn't make sense to get a better look at a child or most anything else by throwing them toward a camera at 99.998% the speed of light, better just to soak whatever in gamma rays but you probably need a special camera too.
The universe is expanding; and that expansion is accelerating. When will camera manufacturers engineer their wares with respect to that? Planned obsolescence? Yep!
Re: Not to be negative
No argument from me, but there can never be agreement when -36 < -18. Some jackwad will come along and explain this -- how you can double it and make it less at the same time.Reeltarded wrote:Fer'n'stance. My negative is -18. I am going to double it. POW! -36.
I'll take the position that for discussion purposes, we speak in absolute value.
Miles, do you lie awake at night thinking this stuff up?
Re: Not to be negative
Phil_S wrote: ......
No argument from me, but there can never be agreement when -36 < -18. Some jackwad will come along and explain this -- how you can double it and make it less at the same time ..........
This reminds me of Zeno's Paradox.
Re: Not to be negative
Nah, not an infinite plane but an infinite mobius strip.eniam rognab wrote:"feel not that it is a sphere we live on.. but rather an infinite plane, which has the illusion of leading yourself back to the point of origin"
See you on the other side!
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10189
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: Not to be negative
The universe only looks like it's expanding 13.7 billion years ago. If we could see 28 billion years ago we'd be crapping our pants about right now.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
Re: Not to be negative
If you double negative -18 its +36Phil_S wrote:No argument from me, but there can never be agreement when -36 < -18. Some jackwad will come along and explain this -- how you can double it and make it less at the same time.Reeltarded wrote:Fer'n'stance. My negative is -18. I am going to double it. POW! -36.
I'll take the position that for discussion purposes, we speak in absolute value.
Miles, do you lie awake at night thinking this stuff up?
Re: Not to be negative
Confused.
Some more or some less.
Is less more or less.
Or is more more.
Might be the same.
Before & after the bang.
Just more or less.
Hmmm.
Some more or some less.
Is less more or less.
Or is more more.
Might be the same.
Before & after the bang.
Just more or less.
Hmmm.
Why Aye Man
Re: Not to be negative
Ummm, so what y'all are saying is 2+2 does not equal 4?
Did I get that part right?
Did I get that part right?
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10189
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: Not to be negative
Two of what? What if it's 2 raisins plus 2 sevens?
This new math.
This new math.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10189
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: Not to be negative
If I were a politician that would be my bumper sticker. Rock.Bob S wrote: Just more or less.
Hmmm.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
Re: Not to be negative
Well I for one have been negatively impacted by this thread does that help? 