Not to be negative

Non-tube amp discussion to discuss music, girls, life, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Reeltarded »

It's blue in all directions and flashing. I should pull over.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Zippy »

Reeltarded wrote:It's blue in all directions and flashing. I should pull over.
Whoa, that's bad.

My light is a pink glow. I think I'm going in the opposite direction.

See ya soon!
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Reeltarded »

For a second I was thinking about throwing things at a camera so you could see finer details because the light would hit the object faster in your direction then I remembered gamma rays and you know it doesn't make sense to get a better look at a child or most anything else by throwing them toward a camera at 99.998% the speed of light, better just to soak whatever in gamma rays but you probably need a special camera too.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
eniam rognab
Posts: 763
Joined: Wed May 15, 2013 4:06 am

Re: Not to be negative

Post by eniam rognab »

"feel not that it is a sphere we live on.. but rather an infinite plane, which has the illusion of leading yourself back to the point of origin"
User avatar
NickC
Posts: 1814
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:05 pm
Location: Upstate New York

Re: Not to be negative

Post by NickC »

Reeltarded wrote:For a second I was thinking about throwing things at a camera so you could see finer details because the light would hit the object faster in your direction then I remembered gamma rays and you know it doesn't make sense to get a better look at a child or most anything else by throwing them toward a camera at 99.998% the speed of light, better just to soak whatever in gamma rays but you probably need a special camera too.

The universe is expanding; and that expansion is accelerating. When will camera manufacturers engineer their wares with respect to that? Planned obsolescence? Yep!
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 6048
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Phil_S »

Reeltarded wrote:Fer'n'stance. My negative is -18. I am going to double it. POW! -36.
No argument from me, but there can never be agreement when -36 < -18. Some jackwad will come along and explain this -- how you can double it and make it less at the same time.

I'll take the position that for discussion purposes, we speak in absolute value.

Miles, do you lie awake at night thinking this stuff up?
User avatar
NickC
Posts: 1814
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:05 pm
Location: Upstate New York

Re: Not to be negative

Post by NickC »

Phil_S wrote: ......
No argument from me, but there can never be agreement when -36 < -18. Some jackwad will come along and explain this -- how you can double it and make it less at the same time ..........

This reminds me of Zeno's Paradox. :wink:
Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Zippy »

eniam rognab wrote:"feel not that it is a sphere we live on.. but rather an infinite plane, which has the illusion of leading yourself back to the point of origin"
Nah, not an infinite plane but an infinite mobius strip.

See you on the other side!
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Reeltarded »

The universe only looks like it's expanding 13.7 billion years ago. If we could see 28 billion years ago we'd be crapping our pants about right now.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
cbass
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Between Pomona & Bakersfield

Re: Not to be negative

Post by cbass »

Phil_S wrote:
Reeltarded wrote:Fer'n'stance. My negative is -18. I am going to double it. POW! -36.
No argument from me, but there can never be agreement when -36 < -18. Some jackwad will come along and explain this -- how you can double it and make it less at the same time.

I'll take the position that for discussion purposes, we speak in absolute value.

Miles, do you lie awake at night thinking this stuff up?
If you double negative -18 its +36
Bob S
Posts: 1575
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:38 pm
Location: Up there with the Michiganders

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Bob S »

Confused.
Some more or some less.
Is less more or less.
Or is more more.
Might be the same.
Before & after the bang.
Just more or less.
Hmmm.
Why Aye Man
Teleguy61
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:26 pm
Location: Eastern Mass USA

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Teleguy61 »

Ummm, so what y'all are saying is 2+2 does not equal 4?
Did I get that part right?
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Reeltarded »

Two of what? What if it's 2 raisins plus 2 sevens?

This new math.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: Not to be negative

Post by Reeltarded »

Bob S wrote: Just more or less.
Hmmm.
If I were a politician that would be my bumper sticker. Rock.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Not to be negative

Post by M Fowler »

Well I for one have been negatively impacted by this thread does that help? :)
Post Reply