Skylark clone question
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Skylark clone question
So I just finished building a skylark clone. It sounds pretty good but the low end feels a bit overly stiff/choked. I'm using a ss rectifier with 2 15v zeners on the PT center tap to pull down the voltage. I'm wondering if over filtering is the culprit--I'm using an 80 uf and 2 40 uf caps. I don't have NFB hooked up yet. Thoughts on what is making the low end so constricted?
Re: Skylark clone question
It's a GA5, one 6v6 and one 12ax7. Basically a tweed champ with slightly different plate and cathode resistors.
Re: Skylark clone question
What kind of OT? With SE, it's typically hard to get good low end w/o a hifi or near-hifi transformer.
Re: Skylark clone question
It's a magnetic components champ OT. It's not weak so much as too stiff.
Re: Skylark clone question
What I'm looking for is a bit spongier.
Re: Skylark clone question
yup, my guess is the filtering is too high.
Last year I knocked up a GA5, the LP version before the Skylark.
I went with a solid state rectifier, the filtering at 20 10 10, as per the old schematics, into an ancient really crappy looking OT.
The response of the amp is more than perfect and the mains filtering is fine.
Best, tony
Last year I knocked up a GA5, the LP version before the Skylark.
I went with a solid state rectifier, the filtering at 20 10 10, as per the old schematics, into an ancient really crappy looking OT.
The response of the amp is more than perfect and the mains filtering is fine.
Best, tony
Re: Skylark clone question
Yes. "Overfiltering" will take away the sponginess.
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Re: Skylark clone question
if that's the old, very cheap MC champ OT it's a dink. I'm lazy about going through the A-B thing with jumpers but I did it here, pure mud, 100% dink. Noticed MC recently offered an upgrade which should be better. The Allen one is terrific & w/ 4&8 ohm taps. The Edcor I put in a 5C1 is killer too but the 5C1 is a unique animal and I'm only familiar with my clone so can't extrapolate to 5F1 or BF.
Over-filtering can do what you don't like. Was the GA5 really 80/40 40, if not why not try stock or 5F1 or BF filtering and see what you get? 5F1 16/8/8 is not too little, I often run mine w/ the Allen through a Brit G12H30 Anni and you can't ask for more from 5 watts.
Over-filtering can do what you don't like. Was the GA5 really 80/40 40, if not why not try stock or 5F1 or BF filtering and see what you get? 5F1 16/8/8 is not too little, I often run mine w/ the Allen through a Brit G12H30 Anni and you can't ask for more from 5 watts.
Re: Skylark clone question
I've never had a problem with a MC transformer before, but after adding NFB, I have to admit it's a lot darker than I expected. Adding a 0.68 uF bypass cap on V1b helps quite a bit, though. I may have to tweak the NFB resistor to compensate.
Re: Skylark clone question
it's not MC as a whole, just that one OT of theirs that's lame. They kind of acknowledged it by offering an upgraded version. Champs (prolly Skylarks?) are dark, muddy OT doesn't help.mumford wrote:I've never had a problem with a MC transformer before
Bypass on V1a is essential, on V1a & b not so nice in a champ, .68-4.7 depending on pickups, not much difference from 4.7-25, actually not much after 2.2. For 15 minutes work you might try making the GA5 into a 5F1 and see if it sounds any better. No sure what the Gibson had but if you're using an 8" I've not found a modern 8 that's bright enough for a champ. Build it for a 10/12" you'll have much more choice to voice it.but after adding NFB, I have to admit it's a lot darker than I expected. Adding a 0.68 uF bypass cap on V1b helps quite a bit, though. I may have to tweak the NFB resistor to compensate.