Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

dehughes
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by dehughes »

tubeswell wrote:Hi dehughes

You can use JJ6V6s - they will go to 475V or even 500V easy and are 14Wers.

As to the voltage regulator ricks there's info on the Aiken site, and as far as limiting resistors go, Merlin B has a helpful article here (his new book is out now BTW)

http://www.freewebs.com/valvewizard/fullwave.html
Nice. I have some JJs I could try in there.

As for the limiting resistors, what type/rating are recommended? I see some general info (not less that 7w...), but I'm wondering if limiting resistors can be installed without just adding (noticeably...) to the "sag". Perhaps in that situation a Zener on the B+ CT would still be best...
Tempus edax rerum
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by Structo »

Well I hope I'm not beating a dead horse but the Zener sure cured every problem I had.

You just pick the rectifier you want to allow that voltage drop then figure how much more you want to drop.

It worked really well for me, at first I thought it was a sort of band aid but now I don't even think about it.

Just remember to get at least a 25 watt stud mount cathode to case.

They do get warm.

Even Aiken likes it.

Scroll down until you see, "A better method - the zener back-bias circuit".

http://www.aikenamps.com/BackBiasing.html
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by tubeswell »

dehughes wrote: As for the limiting resistors, what type/rating are recommended? I see some general info (not less that 7w...), but I'm wondering if limiting resistors can be installed without just adding (noticeably...) to the "sag". Perhaps in that situation a Zener on the B+ CT would still be best...
Given that they are dealing with VAC, which being a RMS value, is about .70 of the peak swing, then to be on the safe side I'd say that each resistor should be at least 2 x the power dissipated by each resistor using the VAC x 1.4 as a guide for voltage in the I x V equation. How rough is that?
dehughes
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by dehughes »

tubeswell wrote:
dehughes wrote: As for the limiting resistors, what type/rating are recommended? I see some general info (not less that 7w...), but I'm wondering if limiting resistors can be installed without just adding (noticeably...) to the "sag". Perhaps in that situation a Zener on the B+ CT would still be best...
Given that they are dealing with VAC, which being a RMS value, is about .70 of the peak swing, then to be on the safe side I'd say that each resistor should be at least 2 x the power dissipated by each resistor using the VAC x 1.4 as a guide for voltage in the I x V equation. How rough is that?
:) Very cool. Thanks man! I think I'm going to go the Zener route, though....
Tempus edax rerum
dehughes
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by dehughes »

Structo wrote:Well I hope I'm not beating a dead horse but the Zener sure cured every problem I had.

You just pick the rectifier you want to allow that voltage drop then figure how much more you want to drop.

It worked really well for me, at first I thought it was a sort of band aid but now I don't even think about it.

Just remember to get at least a 25 watt stud mount cathode to case.

They do get warm.

Even Aiken likes it.

Scroll down until you see, "A better method - the zener back-bias circuit".

http://www.aikenamps.com/BackBiasing.html
Okay, I'm sold. So, if I'm seeing 419v on the OT CT, and I want to get that down around 370-ish, I'd then want a 50v Zener, yes?

Will using this method impart any additional noise/hum/etc. into the chassis ground? That is, might I be messing up my (otherwise) quiet amp, unbeknownst to me?

Also, who the heck stocks a 25 or 50w reverse-polarity Zener? Can't seem to find any in stock...save for a 30v one (might do the trick, but I think I'd rather get at least a 45v reduction...).

Thanks!
Tempus edax rerum
User avatar
sliberty
Posts: 1324
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 5:03 pm

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by sliberty »

I tried a 50V Zener in an AC15 build, and not only did it NOT drop 50V (only about 35V), but it also added some noise. I removed it.

I think the VVR idea is the best one. I was going to suggest it, but someone beat me to it. You'll reduce your voltages AND get a great additoinal feature in your amp. Besides, eners are expensive, so you might as well get more for your money.
User avatar
jjman
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Central NJ USA

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by jjman »

Using a big resistor to drop the entire power supply will trigger sag if not class A. (You won’t have class A.) You would need a 10watter min IMHO. I use one on my 2 x el84 amp and I think it dissipates 3 watts or so at idle. Definitely sags. That's why the zener approach is better for you since you don't want increased sag. Diodes don't change their voltage drop based on the current draw whereas resistors do.
If it says "Vintage" on it, -it isn't.
Wayne
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 2:10 am

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by Wayne »

sliberty wrote:I tried a 50V Zener in an AC15 build, and not only did it NOT drop 50V (only about 35V), but it also added some noise. I removed it.

I think the VVR idea is the best one. I was going to suggest it, but someone beat me to it. You'll reduce your voltages AND get a great additoinal feature in your amp. Besides, eners are expensive, so you might as well get more for your money.
Something sounds wrong with this picture - did you use a bypass cap?

W
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14036
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by M Fowler »

Also, who the heck stocks a 25 or 50w reverse-polarity Zener?

NTE has a 25w 50v reverse zener.

Mark
User avatar
sliberty
Posts: 1324
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 5:03 pm

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by sliberty »

Nope - straight from CT to chassis with short leads too.
dehughes
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by dehughes »

M Fowler wrote:Also, who the heck stocks a 25 or 50w reverse-polarity Zener?

NTE has a 25w 50v reverse zener.

Mark
Can I order from them like I can from Mouser or Newark, or are they just a distributor? They do have what I need...but I'm not clear how to get it from them...
Tempus edax rerum
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by tubeswell »

Hi dehughes

If you can't find a 20W zener, you can use 4 x 5W 12V zeners in series, which will be the equivalent of a 20W 48V zener, or 5 x 5W 9V zeners in series, which would be 25W 45V.

When you do the zeners this way, leave the leads a bit longer and solder them to a tag strip to help dissipate the heat. (Bruce Collins recommend threading a copper penny over the leads to help radiate the heat, but I have never found this necessary to date. The straight zeners are more than sufficient IMHO.

But in most cases it seriously isn't an issue because in 95% of amps, you are talking about dropping the RMS voltage with only a couple of hundred milliamps at most (peak current draw) going through the HT centre tap, so say:

45V x 0.2A = 9W dissipation for something like a Fender Tweed Bassman.

A smaller amp like a 5E3 would have even less current demand than this on the zener. So 20W for 40-50V drop will be more than sufficient in most amps. Similarly, if you are only dropping 12V then 10W should be sufficient (of course, slightly more power handling ability is preferable to slightly less).

Also remember that the amount you zener down the B+ at the HT centre tap is not exactly linear to the amount that the B+ will drop, because you have to factor in the effect of rectifying and filtering that AC voltage coming off the HT winding. Whatever the zener drop on the centre tap, the voltage will drop slightly more on the B+ rail.
Firestorm
Posts: 3033
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:34 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by Firestorm »

The NTE part (NTE5278AK -- a 56 volt, 50w, reverse polarity Zener) shows up as obsolete on a lot of sites. But Centrepointe ( http://www.cpcares.com) shows inventory at $15.35 for 1-4 or $13.82 for 5-9. Good prices compared to the rest of them.

You could also try calling Mouser to see if they can order the Solid State Inc. equivalent, but the search function there only shows the normal polarity version.

If these are getting hard to find, someone should stockpile a stash. Maybe AES could be convinced to carry them?
dehughes
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by dehughes »

Hmm...I'm kinda wondering if I'd be better served to just buy a different PT that would provide the appropriate voltages, being as Zeners are tough to find, and I'm not sure I'd even have the space for one.

[IMG:1024:768]http://i452.photobucket.com/albums/qq24 ... 3-1030.jpg[/img]
Tempus edax rerum
paddy
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:28 pm
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Dropping B+ to simulate the equivalent of a 5Y3, sans sag?

Post by paddy »

Hi there,

If you're having trouble getting a high power zener,then you can use
a low power device to control a power mosfet or transistor.

Aiken has drawn a nice schematic with notes on using both.
Here is a link http://spinoo.free.fr/projetG5/charpy/Zener2.pdf
There are not a lot of components needed and it should fit easily.

I have not tried the "amplified zener" but have used a zener in the
PT center tap on several amps with good results.

A lot of guys have suggested that you try a zener and i must agree.
Give it a go,i think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

cheers,
paddy
Post Reply