The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- FUCHSAUDIO
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
- Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
- Contact:
Do not use for high voltages
Both Fuchs and Suhr had problems with these as plate loads. Breakdown, despite using for less than 1/2-W. They simply open up. Not good. For signal path stuff, tone stacks, grids, etc, no big deal. For any kind of dissipation, RUN AWAY !!!!
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
Re: Do not use for high voltages
Are you talking about Vishay BCcomponents PR01's or the Chinese crappy copies available from various sources, including some large distribs?Both Fuchs and Suhr had problems with these as plate loads. Breakdown, despite using for less than 1/2-W. They simply open up. Not good. For signal path stuff, tone stacks, grids, etc, no big deal. For any kind of dissipation, RUN AWAY !!!!
(PR01's have been part of our standard R's selection for the last 15 years or so with *no* failure whatsoever.)
- FUCHSAUDIO
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
- Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
- Contact:
As shown
The Mouser parts as shown were the ones that failed for us. If there is a new and improved part, or another "better" one I know I would (and surely John Suhr) would love to check them out.
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
-
collinsamps
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:51 pm
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
Good stuff Andy, thanks for the heads up. I'll be keeping them out of my bins when these are gone.
-
collinsamps
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:51 pm
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: Do not use for high voltages
FYL wrote:Are you talking about Vishay BCcomponents PR01's or the Chinese crappy copies available from various sources, including some large distribs?Both Fuchs and Suhr had problems with these as plate loads. Breakdown, despite using for less than 1/2-W. They simply open up. Not good. For signal path stuff, tone stacks, grids, etc, no big deal. For any kind of dissipation, RUN AWAY !!!!
(PR01's have been part of our standard R's selection for the last 15 years or so with *no* failure whatsoever.)
FYL Who is "our"? Your profile is anonymous and doesn't list a business.
Re: As shown
BCcomponents PR01's supplied by Mouser?The Mouser parts as shown were the ones that failed for us.
-
collinsamps
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:51 pm
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
So taking advice from a super secret ninja tone wizard is what's expected here then I suppose.
I read all of your other posts(all 39), same MO, toss in what would be the facts(how does anyone know?) and disappear.
Assumptions are easy. I mean there are at least five builders(only one that I would take technical advice from) that I can think of, that have closed up shop and vanished owing customers thousands of dollars who wouldn't show their identity.
Are we to assume that you are one of those?
I read all of your other posts(all 39), same MO, toss in what would be the facts(how does anyone know?) and disappear.
Assumptions are easy. I mean there are at least five builders(only one that I would take technical advice from) that I can think of, that have closed up shop and vanished owing customers thousands of dollars who wouldn't show their identity.
Are we to assume that you are one of those?
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
Is the Vmax for these new smaller bodies really still the same? I thought the resistor body length factored into that...
--mark
--mark
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
350V DC for the PR01.Is the Vmax for these new smaller bodies really still the same?
Full datasheet:
http://www.vishay.com/docs/28729/28729.pdf
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
He is HAD.collinsamps wrote:So taking advice from a super secret ninja tone wizard is what's expected here then I suppose.
I read all of your other posts(all 39), same MO, toss in what would be the facts(how does anyone know?) and disappear.
Assumptions are easy. I mean there are at least five builders(only one that I would take technical advice from) that I can think of, that have closed up shop and vanished owing customers thousands of dollars who wouldn't show their identity.
Are we to assume that you are one of those?
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
FYL has 1100+ posts over on the Hoffman forum, if you're interested in further study of his MO.collinsamps wrote:So taking advice from a super secret ninja tone wizard is what's expected here then I suppose.
I read all of your other posts(all 39), same MO, toss in what would be the facts(how does anyone know?) and disappear.
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
Exactly why I post with my name so no guessing who the heck I am, you know that idiot named MF
Yes I do realize people can locate me easier but the people here seem like very good people so I don't worry.
MF
MF
Re: Do not use for high voltages
Is there a big difference between these resistors (assuming they are not problematic) and a 1 watt carbon film, when used as a plate load resistor?FUCHSAUDIO wrote:Both Fuchs and Suhr had problems with these as plate loads. Breakdown, despite using for less than 1/2-W. They simply open up. Not good. For signal path stuff, tone stacks, grids, etc, no big deal. For any kind of dissipation, RUN AWAY !!!!
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
Yes, the CC resistor will be noisy! 
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
Re: The Vishay Dale itty bitty 1 watt metal film surprise.
Not sure if you are responding to me..... I was asking about carbon film....Structo wrote:Yes, the CC resistor will be noisy!