dual channel design

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
andmarti1424
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 5:33 pm

dual channel design

Post by andmarti1424 »

Hello everyone!
I have a question regarding this dual channel schematic I found somewhere on the net.
Shouldnt the 47K grid leak resistor (see green line) be switched with the relay as well, so the inactive channel is not amplifying a signal all the time?

Thanks!
dual ch design.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
wpaulvogel
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:11 am
Location: Leesburg Georgia
Contact:

Re: dual channel design

Post by wpaulvogel »

I think it would be best to switch the input of either of the routes that were “offline” to ground because they would be amplifying if in the signal path or going crazy just floating. I’ve done it as I’ve described with a DPDT switch and it works. I’ve never tried it as illustrated in the schematic.
hako
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 7:33 pm

Re: dual channel design

Post by hako »

+1
The 47k is a grid stopper, the grid leak resistor is the 1M at the input jack.
The main purpose of the gs is to prevent noise (rf) and i would use two of them, right at the grid of each preamp tube....
Bergheim
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2019 7:45 pm
Location: Norway

Re: dual channel design

Post by Bergheim »

It won't make any sonical or functional difference if the unused channel is switched off or not as the two channels use dedicated tubes and b+ nodes. I'd run a shielded cable from the input jack to each of the two input stages, each with a 47k resistor right at the tube socket. I'd also reference the coupling cap on the lower channel to ground via a 1M resistor to avoid popping when switching to this channel.
bal704
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:45 pm
Location: USA

Re: dual channel design

Post by bal704 »

The schematic you show is a common way to use a relay to switch channels. Use a relay to determine which channel goes to the PI. I don't ground the unused channel, and I've never had any issues. The weber channel switching PCB grounds the unused channel, and it works fine too.
Lauri
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 6:35 pm
Location: Finland

Re: dual channel design

Post by Lauri »

There needs to be a resistor to ground on the lower channel after the 0.022µF cap before the relay. Otherwise it will pop loudly when changing channel.

[attachment=0]dual ch design-popprevent.png[/attachment]
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
roberto
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Italy

Re: dual channel design

Post by roberto »

wpaulvogel wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:51 pm I think it would be best to switch the input of either of the routes that were “offline” to ground because they would be amplifying if in the signal path or going crazy just floating. I’ve done it as I’ve described with a DPDT switch and it works. I’ve never tried it as illustrated in the schematic.
IMHO it's better to ground the input of the second stage of each channer, rather than the input.
I agree on the DPDT: one side will ground the 2nd stages, the other will send downstream the signal of one channel or the other.
Please refer to ground the last coupling cap of the clean channel, on the relay side, or it will pop.
andmarti1424
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: dual channel design

Post by andmarti1424 »

wpaulvogel wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:51 pm I think it would be best to switch the input of either of the routes that were “offline” to ground because they would be amplifying if in the signal path or going crazy just floating. I’ve done it as I’ve described with a DPDT switch and it works. I’ve never tried it as illustrated in the schematic.
Thanks!
andmarti1424
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: dual channel design

Post by andmarti1424 »

hako wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2019 11:06 pm +1
The 47k is a grid stopper, the grid leak resistor is the 1M at the input jack.
The main purpose of the gs is to prevent noise (rf) and i would use two of them, right at the grid of each preamp tube....
Ahhh. You re right!
Thanks for your tip. It would be one resistor for each stage then.
andmarti1424
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: dual channel design

Post by andmarti1424 »

Lauri wrote: Thu Dec 05, 2019 8:47 am There needs to be a resistor to ground on the lower channel after the 0.022µF cap before the relay. Otherwise it will pop loudly when changing channel.

dual ch design-popprevent.png
Thanks for your suggestion!!! I thought about popping problems as well, but didnt not where to put that resistor!
andmarti1424
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: dual channel design

Post by andmarti1424 »

roberto wrote: Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:18 am
wpaulvogel wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:51 pm I think it would be best to switch the input of either of the routes that were “offline” to ground because they would be amplifying if in the signal path or going crazy just floating. I’ve done it as I’ve described with a DPDT switch and it works. I’ve never tried it as illustrated in the schematic.
IMHO it's better to ground the input of the second stage of each channer, rather than the input.
I agree on the DPDT: one side will ground the 2nd stages, the other will send downstream the signal of one channel or the other.
Please refer to ground the last coupling cap of the clean channel, on the relay side, or it will pop.
Thanks! But why is better to ground the input of second stage rather that the input of each channel?
andmarti1424
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: dual channel design

Post by andmarti1424 »

Finally I got a pop when switching channels using 1M resistor in relay.
Will try 2.2M !!
Post Reply