bias: cathode current vs plate current
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
It works for me to see it,
but after saving it (png pix), we get this black spreadsheet when you open it.
			
			
									
									
						but after saving it (png pix), we get this black spreadsheet when you open it.
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
-It is easy to measure screen current if you have screen resistors. a 7v drop over a 1k resistor, for instance, corresponds to 7mA
			
			
									
									www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
						www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Ok, I’ll see if I can fix it. The point is the correction I proposed above works fine, and you can get that info from the tube data sheets. Beam tubes like 6L6 and 6V6 will have smaller screen current, about 5% of plate current, and therefore a smaller correction factor.
			
			
									
									
						- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
odd when I was reading it last night at home, I could see it just fine, today from work I can't. 
~Phil
			
			
									
									~Phil
tUber Nerd!
						- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Fixed, I think. See original post.
			
			
									
									
						- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Do you know how many tubes were sampled and which brand? I've got about 2-dozen Soviet EL34G in my stash and the plate, screen and bias voltages and currents are all over the placemartin manning wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 1:18 am That's rubbish. Here's some measured data backing up the correction I proposed above:

He who dies with the most tubes... wins
						- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Exactly one. The point I’m making is that the screen current as a fraction of cathode current remains relatively constant. Even if it is off-spec, it isn’t going to make much difference if you just assume a nominal value. And that value is not the max screen dissipation. As mentioned above, if you really want to know the actual plate dissipation, measure the screen current and subtract it out.
			
			
									
									
						Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Following Martin's 15% screen current, (and for a maximum of 70% of power dissipation)
425V and 25W+3.75 = 28,75
.7 X 28.75W= 20.1 Watts
now for the bias: 20.1/425= 47.3mA
power wattage would be: .0473 X 425 = 20.1 Watts
If you now take the Bias King maximum formula (63.6% maximum), you get a close similar value in Watts
.636 X 33W= 20.98 Watts
bias at 63.6% (Bias King maximum formula)
we got for the bias: 20.98/425= 49.3mA
power wattage would be: .0493 X 425 = 20.95 Watts
Martin, thanks for all this research
			
			
									
									
						425V and 25W+3.75 = 28,75
.7 X 28.75W= 20.1 Watts
now for the bias: 20.1/425= 47.3mA
power wattage would be: .0473 X 425 = 20.1 Watts
If you now take the Bias King maximum formula (63.6% maximum), you get a close similar value in Watts
.636 X 33W= 20.98 Watts
bias at 63.6% (Bias King maximum formula)
we got for the bias: 20.98/425= 49.3mA
power wattage would be: .0493 X 425 = 20.95 Watts
Martin, thanks for all this research
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Almost... in both cases the actual Pa is about 15% less. 
Case 1: 20.1/1.15 = 17.5W (70% Pa max)
Case 2: 29.95/1.15 = 18.2W (73% Pa max)
Close, but the Bias meter method is wonky, and doesn’t let you specify plate dissipation directly.
			
			
									
									
						Case 1: 20.1/1.15 = 17.5W (70% Pa max)
Case 2: 29.95/1.15 = 18.2W (73% Pa max)
Close, but the Bias meter method is wonky, and doesn’t let you specify plate dissipation directly.
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
I’ve never understood why amps aren’t built with 1R resistors at the plates to measure plate dissipation directly.
			
			
									
									
						Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Thanks Martin works fine for me now.
Mark
			
			
									
									
						Mark
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Thank you so very much Martin Manning
So if I go back to the first post and redo the "right" formula, it goes like this :
Exemple:
With a plate voltage of 400Volts (411Volts unloaded)
- hot biasing with plate current : (25W/400) X .7 (70%) = 43.7mA ==> maximum bias (70%) (reading on a plate current bias probe)
- hot biasing with cathode current :25W X 1.15= 28.75W : (28.75W/400) X .7 (70%) = 50.31mV into a 1ohm resistor = 50.31mA (V=RI) ( on a cathode current probe)
now we remove the screen dissipation (15%) : 50.31/1.15= 43.75mV through 1 ohm resistor = 43.75mA => current to calculate the power ( P= V X I )
400 V X 0.04375 A = 17.5 Watts
Voilà !
			
			
									
									
						So if I go back to the first post and redo the "right" formula, it goes like this :
Exemple:
With a plate voltage of 400Volts (411Volts unloaded)
- hot biasing with plate current : (25W/400) X .7 (70%) = 43.7mA ==> maximum bias (70%) (reading on a plate current bias probe)
- hot biasing with cathode current :25W X 1.15= 28.75W : (28.75W/400) X .7 (70%) = 50.31mV into a 1ohm resistor = 50.31mA (V=RI) ( on a cathode current probe)
now we remove the screen dissipation (15%) : 50.31/1.15= 43.75mV through 1 ohm resistor = 43.75mA => current to calculate the power ( P= V X I )
400 V X 0.04375 A = 17.5 Watts
Voilà !

- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Yes, and of course the expected dissipation is just the desired percentage of Pa max times rated Pa max. 
Here are data sheet values for the EL34 and a few more tube types. EL84 is a true pentode like EL34; the others are beam types.
Setting % Pa max using cathode current (Class AB1) including screen current correction:
Ik = (%Pa max desired x Pa max x Ig2 Adj)/Va
Type, Pa max (W), Ia0 (mA), Ig20 (mA), Ig2 Adj = (Ia+Ig2)/Ia
EL84 12, 18, 2, 1.11
6V6GT 12, 35, 2, 1.06
EL34 25, 30, 4, 1.13
6L6GC 30, 58, 2.8, 1.05
6550 42, 50, 2.5, 1.05
MPManning 2018.09.23
			
			
									
									
						Here are data sheet values for the EL34 and a few more tube types. EL84 is a true pentode like EL34; the others are beam types.
Setting % Pa max using cathode current (Class AB1) including screen current correction:
Ik = (%Pa max desired x Pa max x Ig2 Adj)/Va
Type, Pa max (W), Ia0 (mA), Ig20 (mA), Ig2 Adj = (Ia+Ig2)/Ia
EL84 12, 18, 2, 1.11
6V6GT 12, 35, 2, 1.06
EL34 25, 30, 4, 1.13
6L6GC 30, 58, 2.8, 1.05
6550 42, 50, 2.5, 1.05
MPManning 2018.09.23
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: bias: cathode current vs plate current
Due to the high voltage, it becomes expensive, you need a high quality 1% resistor. Depending on the tube, let's say it's a 6L6GC at 350VDC. That means at 70% diss you need 60mA so 60mA times 350VDC = 21 Watts. It's best to go up, so 25 watt 1% resistors are EXPENSIVE!
https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/AR ... 2buw%3d%3d
this ones 3 bucks, most resistors are like .20 or so.
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
						

