Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
funkgang49
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey

Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by funkgang49 »

I just had a friend drop off a '74 Marshall Super Lead 100 MKII to have all the multi-cap cans replaced (current ones are original-6 total!) and to replace the 4 power tubes with a new pair(2) of power tubes. He wants to run it with just 2 power tubes - the amp being just too damn loud at its full 100watts.
I will be installing the new tubes in the #2 & #3 power tube socket positions.

My questions:
1. Will installing the pair of new tubes in the #2 & #3 positions be correct for running the amp at half power?

2. Will leaving out the full quad of tubes alter the way that I will need to bias the amp?

I am new to setting bias on fixed bias amps. All my experience has been with cathode bias amps so far.
I have done research on how to set bias by measuring plate voltage and will be using a bias probe plugged into my DMM to read milliamps and set bias according to tube requirements and standard calculations.
TUBEDUDE
Posts: 1864
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Mastersville

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by TUBEDUDE »

You still bias the tubes for the desired dissipation. Look online for Jims bias.tables. You'll see the chart for EL34 tubes, under the measured plate voltage, select the desired dissipation, and adjust the bias control for the listed current.
Try playing the amp to see which bias setting sounds best.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
funkgang49
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by funkgang49 »

That's what I thought. I just wanted to make sure - new territory for me.

Thanks!
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 6048
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by Phil_S »

Remember, half power doesn't equal half volume. Assuming it is now a 50W amp it will still be (too) frikin' loud. To get 100W down to half volume, you will need to get to about 10W, which isn't possible on this amp.
old tube
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:56 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by old tube »

With 2 EL34's you should change the output impedance. So if you have a 16ohm cab, set the amp at 8ohms (I hope I've got that the right way round!)
funkgang49
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by funkgang49 »

Remember, half power doesn't equal half volume. Assuming it is now a 50W amp it will still be (too) frikin' loud. To get 100W down to half volume, you will need to get to about 10W, which isn't possible on this amp.
Yep, got that - was going on the idea that cutting the wattage in half would equate to a 3db drop in volume which in this case, 100 screamin' obnoxious watts, should help.

I will also set bias so plate dissipation is closer to 75% for a slightly earlier breakup.
With 2 EL34's you should change the output impedance. So if you have a 16ohm cab, set the amp at 8ohms (I hope I've got that the right way round!)
Wasn't even thinking about the effect on impedance - thanks for the heads up!
Stevem
Posts: 5144
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.

M

Post by Stevem »

Have your friend open up his wallet and get a Attenuator , period!
Trust me, other than getting a different 30 to 40 watt amp this is the best way to go!!!!
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!

Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
funkgang49
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by funkgang49 »

Ok, so I have my bias table set:
New filter caps in place, new power tubes (2XJJEL34's-max 25watt) & preamp tubes in place, bias probe connected, etc.

My plate voltage is 472v.
25watt max. / 472v = .052 or 52mA
.052 X 70% = .0364

Problem is that the bias adjust trimmer when set to max. is only giving me 25mA which works out to only 50%!

Which resistor do I need to change in order to achieve a higher mA range?

[img:1280:720]http://s25.postimg.org/qgfxh7onj/Marsha ... _point.jpg[/img]
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 6048
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by Phil_S »

It looks like there is a voltage divider with 15K on the supply side and 33K + 25K pot on the ground side. Verify this, as I can't see the traces on the board. Try changing the 33K.

If that doesn't do what you need, try increasing the dropping resistor before the diode, not shown in your picture.
Roe
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by Roe »

watch out for redplating. the power supply won't sag much with 2 el34s and mismatched load
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
Stevem
Posts: 5144
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.

C

Post by Stevem »

Yup!
What I also do is install trash (used up) output tubes , but clip off pins 3 and 4 to keep the heater voltage where it should be and in turn the intended gain levels of the amp.
Then a dot of silicone sealer at two spots on the base will hold them in nice!
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!

Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
pdf64
Posts: 2932
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Biasing Marshall Super Lead 100

Post by pdf64 »

Yes, to best retain the intended tone and response, an attenuator etc seems a much better idea.
An SL with 2 tubes removed has a super stiff power supply, pushing up the (full load) operating points, stressing the 2 tubes more.
And likely puts out >60 watt, saving barely 2dB.

There's a lot of stuff on Myles Rose' site that seems a bit iffy, but he puts things well on the 3rd to last paragraph here http://www.guitaramplifierblueprinting. ... ences.html
https://www.justgiving.com/page/5-in-5-for-charlie This is my step son and his family. He is running 5 marathons in 5 days to support the research into STXBP1, the genetic condition my grandson Charlie has. Please consider supporting him!
Post Reply