Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
schaublin65
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 11:59 am
Location: Ireland

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by schaublin65 »

Hi,

the short story is no

The long version is that the only disagreement in this thread is between you and the poster you insulted.

Take care....

John
54Goldtop
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:12 am
Location: United States

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by 54Goldtop »

I would agree that those participating are being cordial and contributing allot of opinions that overlap to some degree - I wouldn't go as far as to say you all agree, or a general consensus is being formed. As to the issue of a poster being insulted I would point to cause and effect... It's very unfortunate really.
Last edited by 54Goldtop on Sun Dec 07, 2014 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
matt h
Posts: 1224
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 2:26 am
Location: New England

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by matt h »

What it says:
54Goldtop wrote:I would agree that those participating are being cordial and contributing allot of opinions, but I don't see a general consensus or conclusion being formed - As to the issue of a poster being insulted I would point to cause and effect... It's very unfortunate really.
What it means:
54Goldtop wrote: Troll.
Troll.
Troll troll troll troll.

Troll troll troll troll troll troll.
54Goldtop
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:12 am
Location: United States

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by 54Goldtop »

Matt - Affirmations?
54Goldtop
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:12 am
Location: United States

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by 54Goldtop »

A horse is a horse of course of course
unless of course if it's a talking horse :D
matt h
Posts: 1224
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 2:26 am
Location: New England

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by matt h »

(deleted)
Last edited by matt h on Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jazbo8
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:59 am

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by jazbo8 »

To the OP - upon reviewing the old posts, it seems that you were asking two different questions: 1) class A PP vs. PSE, the answer of which you already provided here; and 2) class AB PP vs PSE, which you claim that there is no consensus by the various posters.

Since you come across to be more than a "layman" as suggested by your answer to 1), could you please put forth your take on 2)? You seem to be fixated on the slight differences between the various posters' responses instead on their common points, to some, it may come across as flame-bait...:wink:
pdf64
Posts: 2932
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by pdf64 »

This all becomes more relevant to power output when we realize that it affects the load that each tube sees. PP transformers are spec'ed 'plate-to-plate'. An output transformer might be wound so that 8 ohms across the secondary appears as 5k ohms across the entire primary from one end (plate) to the other. We're told that with pure Class A each tube sees 1/2 of that or 2.5k while with pure Class B each tube sees 1/4 (1.25k). What do they see in Class AB? (Notice that 1/4 the entire plate-to-plate load requires that one tube is cut off completely during each 1/2 cycle so that that half of the transformer primary is an essentially an open circuit.)
Yes, you've summed up a conumdrum!

However, from http://www.valvewizard.co.uk/pp.html does it matter, as two methods of estimating output power are put forward, the latter is more of an estimate but doesn't appear to require cut off?
And we know that transformer action should cause each PP plate to swing between 0v and 2VB+ (ignoring losses).

Much abbreviated summary -
Output power:
P = (HT-Vmin) * Ipeak / 2
= 17.9W
Alternatively
P = 2 * (HT-50)^2 / Rload 15.6W


Maybe the second formula is why amps never seem to put out as much power as they should (or is that just me)?
https://www.justgiving.com/page/5-in-5-for-charlie This is my step son and his family. He is running 5 marathons in 5 days to support the research into STXBP1, the genetic condition my grandson Charlie has. Please consider supporting him!
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by Structo »

schaublin65 wrote:Hi

I'm kind of new to this forum. :D

Since this seems to be the right thread to ask for spoonfed information I was wondering if my amp works the same if it's upside down?

Please don't be harsh and abrasive if you reply :oops:

I'm much too lazy to read RDH3 & 4.

Take care....

John
If you look up a tube's data sheet there will be a notation stating the tube "Mounting position".

Usually they state "any position" for the tube

But some tubes are designed to be mounted horizontal
But guitar amps are not as picky about tube position.

The only difference is that the amp with the tubes hanging down, such as Dumble amps and Fender heads, tend to get hotter because the heat is rising to the chassis.

Marshall amps of course use the tubes up method.

But to answer your first question, the amp will work right side up or upside down. :wink:
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
Tony Bones
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:24 pm

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by Tony Bones »

pdf64 wrote: Yes, you've summed up a conumdrum!
Yeah, well, it doesn't keep us from understanding why we can potentially get more power from a pair of tubes PP than PSE. It prevents us from performing an exact calculation but I'm more interested in understanding than numbers.

None of this serves the OP but I don't care; I'm not here to serve the OP.
Jana
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:40 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by Jana »

It's better to have the tubes pointing up. If they are pointing down, then the electrons tend to pool in the tube.
What?
User avatar
cbass
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Between Pomona & Bakersfield

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by cbass »

Jana wrote:It's better to have the tubes pointing up. If they are pointing down, then the electrons tend to pool in the tube.
Not a big deal I just pull the glass off and wipe out the excessive electrons with a clean. Cloth
User avatar
johnnyreece
Posts: 1072
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:05 am
Location: New Castle, IN

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by johnnyreece »

Structo wrote:
schaublin65 wrote:Hi

I'm kind of new to this forum. :D

Since this seems to be the right thread to ask for spoonfed information I was wondering if my amp works the same if it's upside down?

Please don't be harsh and abrasive if you reply :oops:

I'm much too lazy to read RDH3 & 4.

Take care....

John
If you look up a tube's data sheet there will be a notation stating the tube "Mounting position".

Usually they state "any position" for the tube

But some tubes are designed to be mounted horizontal
But guitar amps are not as picky about tube position.

The only difference is that the amp with the tubes hanging down, such as Dumble amps and Fender heads, tend to get hotter because the heat is rising to the chassis.

Marshall amps of course use the tubes up method.

But to answer your first question, the amp will work right side up or upside down. :wink:
I'm sure the original question was in jest, but for those who are curious, rectifiers like the 5Y3 and 5U4 are examples that are sensitive to horizontal mounting (the filament can sag and short spectacularly). It can be done, but they need to be oriented in a certain way to avoid potential catastrophe.

Derailed thread? Check. 8)
pdf64
Posts: 2932
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by pdf64 »

None of this serves the OP but I don't care; I'm not here to serve the OP.
Exactly, I'm here to due to tube amp fixation, OPs are just the starting point, any benefit to thread starters is kinda supplementary.
https://www.justgiving.com/page/5-in-5-for-charlie This is my step son and his family. He is running 5 marathons in 5 days to support the research into STXBP1, the genetic condition my grandson Charlie has. Please consider supporting him!
matt h
Posts: 1224
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 2:26 am
Location: New England

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by matt h »

(deleted)
Last edited by matt h on Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply