explanation cathode vs fixed

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 6048
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by Phil_S »

70% is for fixed bias. Cathode bias generally operates at 100% and is not very efficient. You can bias at 100% because cathode bias is said to be self limiting. It is hard to know because you didn't offer any info like plate voltage and primary impedance on the OT. If you look this up, a pair of 6L6 at Va=360, Zout=9000, then Pout = 24. I'm going to guess you have a <50W amp. More likely is is south of 40W, which is still frikin' loud.
User avatar
rp
Posts: 2528
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: Italy

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by rp »

They sound and respond very different, you're just gonna have to get hands on experience. Build any of the tweeds with 2 6l6s and fixed bias, or even the later fenders like 6G3 or Blonde or black Bassmans and then add a switched cathode bias set up. It's fun. I prefer fixed in my 5F6A when turned up but at medium and low volumes the cathode bias is very nice to have, and I hate multitaskers with lotsa switches as my idea of added functionality is building an other amp.
pdf64
Posts: 2932
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by pdf64 »

2 6L6 at max dissapation would be 50 watts. Biased at 70% would be 35 watts a channel. So 70 watts stereo is a good guess
Static dissipation / max plate dissipation / power output don't correlate, eg power output doesn't increase as bias voltage reduces (given a starting point of basic functionality).
50 watts from a pair of 6L6s doesn't necessitate a static dissipation of 100%, rather it would be a bad idea as plate dissipation will then be over 100% for some signal levels.
Similarly, swapping in tubes of a higher max plate dissipation rating won't (significantly) increase power output (all else being equal), eg putting 35 watt 7581A into a 5F6A bassman (designed around 23 watt 5881) won't make it a 70 watt amp.
Pete
https://www.justgiving.com/page/5-in-5-for-charlie This is my step son and his family. He is running 5 marathons in 5 days to support the research into STXBP1, the genetic condition my grandson Charlie has. Please consider supporting him!
teemuk
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:01 pm

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by teemuk »

User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by jelle »

http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/df97_p ... urves.html

Not sure if this point was raised already... See what raising the supressor grid voltage does to operation of the tube. And many newer tubes need higher cathode resistors to function properly.
User avatar
jazbo8
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:59 am

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by jazbo8 »

tsutt wrote:ok thats better. I'll leave it at that for now. i could ask constant questions. As because has never worked for me. So the next one would why wouldn't i be able to get power with a cathode bias, whats happening that it limits it. see where this could go. i'll let it sit. dont want to be a nuisance. This is how i learn best unfortunately. me and books are like oil and water. reference only. unless it a really good novel. :D
Where does the power go? This one is easy, even I can answer it! The cathode resistor consumes the power = heat. With fixed bias, there is no resistor, so less wasted power.
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by tubeswell »

Cathode biasing also allows an additional method of frequency shaping via selective frequency boosting through bypassing the cathode resistor with whatever the desired capacitance. If unbypassed, you also get wide-band cathode current feedback for signal smoothing.

Whereas fixed bias doesn't offer these possibilities, but does give higher gain for a given HT voltage.

Does that help?
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
tsutt
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by tsutt »

Takes a long time for all this to sink in, got a hard head full of mush. Thanks for the input guys.
User avatar
Cygnus X1
Posts: 915
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:56 am
Location: Midlands South Carolina

Re: explanation cathode vs fixed

Post by Cygnus X1 »

JoeCon wrote:Cygnus

2 6L6 at max dissapation would be 50 watts. Biased at 70% would be 35 watts a channel. So 70 watts stereo is a good guess.

How does it sound as a stero amp for palyback rather than organ?
I'd love a nice tube stereo amp, maybe another build for the list...

See ya!
It's passable.
Nice and clear and powerful enough to drive my PA monitors.
12" + horn.
Perfect for the garage and for jamming along to backing tracks at good volume.
Post Reply